Tình hình Ukraine và bóng ma của nội chiến

Ừ thì đằng nào cung chỉ hóng chứ chúng ta sao biết nổi đúng sai, đâu là sự thật. Có gì cứ quẳng hết lên đây

After keeping a meaningful two-month pause in covering the course of investigation of the MH17 tragedy, the international press has suddenly broke into another wave of baseless accusations against “pro-Russia separatists”, triggered by a “secret report” made by the BND (Bundesnachrichtendienst, German foreign intelligence) for the Bundestag Control Committee on October 8, 2014. Ten days later the Spiegel alleged that at the meeting the BND president Gerhard Schindler had provided “satellite images and diverse photo evidence” to back up his case “proving that pro-Russian separatists captured a BUK air defense missile system at a Ukrainian military base and fired a missile on July 17 that exploded in direct proximity to the Malaysian aircraft”. The allegation was immediately caught up by a number of other top international media.
On October 20 Alexander Nerad’ko, the director of Russia’s Federal Air Transport Agency, invited the German intelligence to publish documentation demonstrating the involvement of the insurgents or the Ukrainian army in the disaster. Unfortunately, his request is not met till now.
Ironically, one day before BND presented its report to Bundestag, the former Dutch Foreign Affairs Minister Frans Timmermans has casually let out that “the body of one passenger was found wearing an oxygen mask”.

This piece of information trashes the theory (which we used to hold too) of a shoot down by a surface-to-air missile as in this case the instantaneous depressurization of the MH17 passenger cabin would cause immediate death of all passengers.
Both Western and Russian experts understand that serious conclusions on the causes of MH17 tragedy should be based on professional forensic study of the wreckage and damaging elements. All available technical data from Ukrainian dispatch lines, surveillance by Russia and USA, information of the Ukrainian Air Defense and Boeing Corporation should be made available for the International MH17 investigation commission. All other “leakages” are pointless talks and deceitful manipulation of the public opinion. E.g. the British barrister Alexander Mercouris has provided a detailed analysis depicting numerous controversies in the German report (as least in its clauses leaked to the press).
The full text in English of MH17 Incident Report released by the Russian Union of Engineers on August 15, 2014 is available for download here.
The full text in English of MH17 Incident Report released by the Russian Union of Engineers on August 15, 2014 is available for download here (PDF).
The Russian experts has already gathered all available data and released the Incident Report on MH17 tragedy back in mid-August this year. Its full text in English is available here. Its concluding points are as follows (abstracts):
“9.1. In relation to the circumstances of the crash of the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 jet.
At 17.17-17.20, the Boeing 777 was in Ukrainian airspace near the city of Donetsk at the height of 10100 m. An unidentified combat aircraft (presumably a Su-25 or MiG -29), which was a tier below, on a collision course, in the cloud layer, sharply gained altitude and suddenly appeared out of the clouds in front of the civilian aircraft and opened fire on the ****pit, firing from a 30 mm caliber cannon or smaller.
As a result of multiple hits from shells there was damage to the ****pit, which suddenly depressurized, resulting in instant death for the crew due to mechanical influences and decompression. The attack was sudden and lasted a fraction of a second; in such circumstances the crew could not sound any alarm as the flight had been proceeding in regular mode and no attack was expected.
Since neither the engines or hydraulic system, nor other devices required for the continuation of the flight were out of commission, the Boeing 777, running on autopilot (as is standard), continued on its horizontal flight path, perhaps gradually losing altitude.
The pilot of the unidentified combat aircraft maneuvered to the rear of the Boeing 777. After that, the unidentified plane remained on the combat course, the pilot provided a target tracking aircraft equipment, took aim and launched his R-60 or R-73 missiles.
The result was a loss of cabin pressure, the aircraft control system was destroyed, the autopilot failed, the aircraft lost the ability to maintain its level flight path, and went into a tailspin. The resulting overload led to mechanical failure of the airframe at high altitudes.
The aircraft, according to the information available from the flight recorders, broke up in the air, but this is possible only in the case of a vertical fall from a height of ten thousand meters, which can only happen when the maximum permissible overload is exceeded. One reason for stalling and going into a tailspin is the inability of the crew to control the aircraft as a result an emergency in the ****pit and the subsequent instantaneous depressurization of the ****pit and the passenger cabin. The aircraft broke up at a high altitude, which explains the fact that the wreckage was scattered over the territory of more than 15 square kilometers.
9.2. In relation to the party responsible for the death of 283 passengers and 15 crew members.
On 17.07.2014, the armed forces of the self-proclaimed Donetsk National Republic had no relevant combat aircraft capable of destroying an aerial target similar to the Boeing 777, nor the necessary airfield network, nor the means of radar detection, targeting and tracking.
No combat aircraft of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation violated the airspace of Ukraine, which the Ukrainian side confirms as well as third parties who conduct space surveillance over the situation in Ukraine and in its airspace.
To establish the truth, it is necessary to objectively and impartially investigate all the circumstances of the destruction of the Malaysian Boeing 777, to interview the thousands of citizens who may have seen something.”

Bọn phát xít đang đánh trống lãng qua vụ máy bay nơi mà thầy bà cũng không thể kiểm chứng để cho qua tình hình tươi sáng của cách mạng U đấy.

Nói sao thì nói chứ truyền thống ngậm shjt biến không thành có của bố mẽo mấy chục năm qua mà nhiều nhà rân chủ vẫn tung hô nhỉ chắc ko phải nhắc đên những cái gì nữa chứ

Clip mà Úc mới đưa lên cách đây 2 hôm, người ta tập trung vào tình tiết lời thoại ( k biết thật hay giả) đề cập đến chiếc máy bay thứ hai. Thế mà báo Việt lại giật tít: "
Công bố hình ảnh phe ly khai thân Nga lục đồ hành khách MH17"
Đúng là trong đó có cảnh lục hành lý nhưng chuyện này đã được nói đến rất nhiều từ năm ngoái.
Khốn nạn mấy đứa PTV.

Mấy thằng dở hơi nó cứ lờ tịt vụ Tổng Po sắp bị tùng xẻo bằng cái mồ MH17 mà các bác cứ quấn theo nó làm gì thế nhỉ...

Không phải nói đùa, việc phe cực hữu biểt việc quân Nga sắp can thiệp

Just For Fun:

Các đồng chí cho hỏi 1 câu: Sao tụi Hồi này lại sùng bái hàng Nga đến vậy ta? Tôi nghĩ nó bám đýt Mèo thì phải khênh M16 ra bắn chứ ha

Đang hưng phấn nó tắc phát mất cmn vui

hê hê mũi giống mũi đuôi giống đuôi cánh giống cánh.... có vẻ nó giống cmn cả 2 nhể. Hình chụp vệ tinh thì mờ mờ thế mới ảo. Thằng bào giống su thằng bảo giống mig....hên xui. Tóm lại "bố "chưa bảo đây là giả nên tôi vẫn tin là ảnh thật

http://www.thanhnien.com.vn/the-gioi/hang-tin-nga-go-bo-muc-do-vui-ve-vu-mh17-586511.html
Thằng Ria lá cải lắm phốt quá nhỉ năm ngoái đã xuyên tạc láo lếu bị lên án rồi , giờ vẫn tiếp tục những hành động chế giễu những nạn nhân vụ Mh-17