F-22 Raptor và F-35JSF-máy bay tiêm kích thế hệ thứ 5

wordpress là giống blógpot viết gì cũng đuợc , thầy ko nói F117 ko có sơn RAM nhé nhung

Còn nua sơn RAM phải có robot

The painting of the F-117 is done by industrial robots so the paint can be applied consistently in specific layer thicknesses and densities.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation-absorbent_material

Chú nói F-22 có RAM vậy tại sao nó ko hơn F-35 ? giải thích bằng link chính thống xem nào

http://www.warfaresims.com/?p=755

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/a...er-to-sue-lockheed-for-stealth-design-329025/

mày lấy web game sim ra minh họa à

link duới đếch thèm đọc lun

A stealth expert on the F-117 and B-2 programmes intends to file suit against Lockheed Martin later this week for concealing alleged deficiencies with the stealth coatings for the F-22.

F-22 cũng tuyệt rồi.

Radar absorbant materials, or RAM is applied sparingly on the F-22 airframe as opposed to the entire airframe on the F-117. This is because designers have incorporated curves on crucial surfaces and edges, which lessens the need for RAM. For example, new ceramic-matrix RAM is utilized on the engine exhaust nozzles to reduce radar and IR signatures, and a greater amount of wide-band structural RAM is used on the wing edges. The interesting shape of the radome on the F-22 reflects radar signals at all frequencies except the precise wavelengths emitted from the F-22. This can be attributed to the radome's low bandpass type.
To apply the complex system of paints and coatings necessary to meet the F-22's stringent radar cross section (RCS) requirements takes not only state-of-the-art equipment and hands-on technicians, but also a wide-ranging support system. A new type of paint, or topcoat, increases the F-22 Raptor's stealthiness by reducing its vulnerability to infrared threats. To meet F-22 requirements, Boeing developed the topcoat to protect the aircraft against a broad range of wavelengths. The new paint replaces conventional topcoats, performing all the required environmentally protective functions while also reducing the aircraft's vulnerability to detection. The topcoat does not add to the F-22's weight, and provides performance enhancement at a very modest cost. It is applied in a two-tone camouflage design, patterned after the F-15 "Mod-Eagle" paint scheme. Development of the new topcoat began during the early stages of the F-22 program. Since that time, a small team at Boeing in Seattle has worked to refine the paint and improve its application characteristics in a production-level environment. Technicians at Lockheed Martin painted the first few aircraft by hand, however, robotic application is planned for future Raptors
-----------------------

Air Combat Command chief Gen. Mike Hostage, according to reporter Colin Clark, "labels as 'old think' those critics who point to the F-117 shoot-down and the presumed supremacy of high-powered electronic-magnetic warfare."

“Oldthink”, of course, is a word straight out of Orwell’s Ministry of Truth. Oldthinkers unbellyfeel FifthGenerationTM, indeed.
That aside, we should remember that Hostage ruffled a few feathers with a quote earlier this year:
If I do not keep that F-22 fleet viable, the F-35 fleet frankly will be irrelevant. The F-35 is not built as an air superiority platform. It needs the F-22.
That was not exactly a ringing endorsement of the F-35, particularly for customers who had been assured that F-35 was, no kidding, a dominant air-superiority platform (as the Australians were, in sworn testimony to Parliament). So, particularly with Canada's government ready to announce another sole-source decision to buy JSF without a competition that would provide a full view of alternative fighters, it is good news for the program if Hostage talks over his previous statement.
In the new interview, Hostage talks up the F-35’s stealth and expressly takes issue with the Boeing/Navy picture of the F-35 requiring first-day support from the EA-18G Growler or other electronic warfare assets.
“In the first moments of a conflict I’m not sending Growlers or F-16s or F-15Es anywhere close to that environment, so now I’m going to have to put my fifth gen in there and that’s where that radar cross-section and the exchange of the kill chain is so critical. You’re not going to get a Growler close up to help in the first hours and days of the conflict, so I’m going to be relying on that stealth to open the door.”
However, note that Hostage is not saying that F-35s will go in unsupported: they will use numbers for mutual support:
“I’m going to have some F-35s doing air superiority, some doing those early phases of persistent attack, opening the holes, and again, the F-35 is not compelling unless it’s there in numbers,” the general says. “Because it can’t turn and run away, it’s got to have support from other F-35s. So I’m going to need eight F-35s to go after a target that I might only need two (F-22) Raptors to go after. But the F-35s can be equally or more effective against that site than the Raptor can because of the synergistic effects of the platform.”
The words “that site” imply that Hostage is talking about destruction of enemy air defenses (DEAD) rather than air superiority alone – where the F-22’s speed and larger missile load could be expected to yield an advantage over the F-35. But a four-to-one advantage for the F-22 in DEAD, which is one of the JSF’s prime design missions, is unfavourable in terms of cost-effectiveness: according to a 2008 RAND study of continuing production of the F-22 (at 30 or fewer per year) and the most optimistic F-35 numbers from Lockheed Martin (at 150-plus per year), the F-22 at worst costs twice as much as the F-35.
Hostage makes another, very interesting comparison between the F-22 and the F-35.
The F-35′s cross section is much smaller than the F-22′s. “The F-35 doesn’t have the altitude, doesn’t have the speed [of the F-22], but it can beat the F-22 in stealth.”
Now, we all know that a lot of things can go happen between the interviewee’s brain and the interviewer’s keyboard, but the idea that the F-35 is stealthier than the F-22 contradicts pretty much everything that has been said about the program for the past 20 years, including the reporting of my former colleague, the usually well-informed Dave Fulghum.
The statement is curious for other reasons. Nobody ever suggested in the program’s formative years that the goal was to beat the F-22's stealth - and indeed that would be extremely unlikely since the JSF was designed for export. Stealth, along with other requirements, was also subject to trades in the development of the final JSF requirement, and less important than life-cycle cost.
The geometrical basics of stealth -- sweep and cant angles, minimized small-radius curves and nozzle design -- favor the F-22, and everything anyone has said about radar absorbent materials for years has been about life-cycle cost rather than performance.
Hostage is effusive about the value of the F-35’s sensor fusion and datalinks, too:
“Fusion says here’s what’s out there. You told me, this one right here’s a threat. Here’s what it’s doing right now. Here’s what your wingman (knows): he sees he’s got a missile on the right, so I’m not going to waste a missile because I already see that my wingman’s taking care of it.”

Có 1 thực tế là trong thực chiến, yếu tố con người mới là quan trọng nhất. Chứ gươm ánh sáng vào tay bọn hồi mọi thì cũng chỉ để đi cắt dây thép gai hàng rào thôi. Thế nên mọi người tập trung nói về thông tin sản phẩm, để những người khác được mở mang tầm mắt. Không nên sa đà vào vật nhau.

Một điều nữa, dù cuồng Tàu hay Nga cũng phải nhìn nhận mặt nào thằng Mỹ vượt trội.
Mỹ dẫn đầu công nghệ máy bay thế hệ 5, nó đâu có ngu hơn mấy chú Hắc, chú Tinh, chú Koy hay chú Des. Cả thế giới còn phải ăn cắp công nghệ, học hỏi nó.
... mà các chú đòi dạy nó?

--- Gộp bài viết: 11/04/2016, Bài cũ từ: 11/04/2016 ---

Sơn Robot có gì đặc biệt đâu? trong dây chuyền sơn phun ngoài súng robot, vẫn phải có 1, 2 đầu phun thủ công để phun chỗ ngóc ngách và chữa

Nó chỉ kẹp cái đầu phun sơn vào cánh tay robot, cũng như kẹp cái dao tiện vào máy CNC,
tác dụng lớn nhất là năng suất. Còn làm ít thì làm manual cũng đc.

Cánh tay robot hay CNC 5, 6 trục Việt Nam cũng làm được.

Thấy các cô phò Mỹ tá Tàu trên đây tranh nhau khoe máy bay phe mình dựa trên tính năng máy bay Nga la tư. Vậy các cô @Hac_Cong_Tu và @despair cho chị hỏi mấy cái màn hình LCD dưới này đang chiếu hình chế độ gì vậy





Trả lời được thì chị sẽ nhờ cô @kuyomuko vào làm trọng tài vụ câu hỏi phân loại trẻ trâu này. Nhược bằng không thì gác phím rút về hang ổ luyện tiếp hẹn ngày tái đấu nhé

Em chịu chị Hương ah.
Em chỉ biết nó viết chữ OLS to tướng, nên chắc nó liên quan đến cái Optical với InfraRed nhà chú Khựa hay khoe.

Robot dùng trong công nghiệp quân sự so sánh với robot thi robocon hả cu, cái thằng ngu số đếm như mày thì nên bớt gõ phím đi. Sao mày ko vd luôn con asimo cũng có thể cầm súng bắn giết được luôn đi

Link 1: Sao ko trích link từ http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/f-22-stealth.htm nhĩ ?, trang này cập nhập thông tin ko chính xác.

1 nó vẫn cho rằng F-22 có RCS nhỏ hơn F-35
2 nó vẫn cho rằng F-22 sử dụng RAM

Thực ra tất cả chỉ là dựa theo quảng cáo của F-22 những năm 2000-2009, thông tin cập nhập rất kém, trong khi người rành KTQS đều rõ F-35 ăn đứt F-22 trong mảng Stealth nhờ RAM. Còn nữa lớp áo khoác F-35 ko thể tích hợp với F-22, lớp RAM cũ của F-22 cũng bị kiện vì ko đúng với quảng cáo (ở page trước thầy đã dạy thằng tinha rồi cháu despair ko cần phải nhai lại)

Link 2 đỏ: chính mày tự trích link F-35 có RCS nhỏ hơn F-22 nhé bọn rồ Mỹ vừa ngu tiếng Việt vừa ngu cả tiếng Anh nhưng rất thích copy & paste 1 đống link tiếng anh, mặc dù chẳng hiểu tụi nó viết gì