(^_^) Lớp học Tiếng Anh Mrs. THUY _ ED (^_^)(Tầng 29 ^_^)

For E31
SOME PEOPLE THINK EDUCATE CHILDREN OF DIFFERENT ABILITIES TOGETHER WILL BENEFIT THEM. OTHERS THINK INTELLIGENT CHILDREN SHOULD BE TAUGHT SEPARATELY AND GIVE SPECIAL COURSES. DISCUSS.
Endowed by different talents, every individual is contributing to our society in different ways. Therefore, to treat every student equality is a common practice at existent schools; however, there is a tendency of growing popularity that schools are oriented by producing â?oelite studentsâ?. It has aroused fierce controvesies, for which reason I suggest that schools should keep their tra***ional strategy unchanged.
To begin with, to separate students according to their individual competence can injure their personality development. Some seemingly intelligent students are instilled with a sense of superiority. Consequently, they place themselves over the rest of the class, but some findings have indicated that those are of great wise are not necessary of great use.
Secondly, to categorise students with a rigid rule can spur the rivalry between students, which is harmful for the academic atmosphere of a school. Schools are prestigious because of their inborn ability to provide children a relaxing and cooperative environment to study. To treat gifted children different would inescapably upgrade the competition between children. Arguments or infightings thus escalate.
Admittedly, to devise particular courses for a certain group of students can find their way to benefit studentsâ?T future. Some students have advanced their special interests in some subjects, such as philosophy, astronomy, and geography, to mention but a few. Those subjects, in general, demand fewer practitioners, compared with other profitable subjects, e.g, business, computer, and graphic design etc. However, as emphasised before, it is rational to leave students options to choose, instead of forcing an inflexible rule.
In brief, to train students for specific purpose might be beneficial in some sense, but to coach them together is more favourable a strategy.

SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT UNIVERSITY SHOULD NOT PROVIDE THEORETICAL KNOWLEDGE, BUT TO GIVE PRACTICAL TRAINING BENEFIT TO SOCIETY. IN WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?
Most universities and colleges spend a rather long period in fundamental theories and elementary courses. However, students regard these kinds of knowledge useless, pay less attention to them. They suggest school pay more time for practical training instead of providing theoretical lessons. In my opinion, however, theoretical knowledge is necessary. Hence, one will definitely benefit from it.
First, fundamental theories, such as maths and physics, are the basis of other knowledge. To a student who majors in automatic control, the course of control system is the most practical and useful in the future. However, if he isnâ?Tt good at maths and circuit, he will hardly be able to understand the principles and methods of how to control a subject or process. It is just like constructing a building. How can you imagine a spectacular high â?" rise without a firm groundsill? That is, theories and practices are interrelated. We can ignore neither of them.
Second, theoretical basic knowledge provides not only the knowledge itself, but also a way that how to learn and research. University is a place for scientific research and invention. Therefore, it is necessary for students to have the skill of doing research. Seeing from another angle, science and techniques are exploding so quickly that present skills will soon be out of date. If one learnt nothing except practical skills, he would also fall behind the society. Nevertheless, if one could master the method of research, he would be able to refresh himself continuosly with advanced technology.
From all the commentaries above, we can learn the important role of theoretical knowledge. Although pragmatism is very popular today, we should pay enough attention to the basis and principles.

THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD CONTROL THE AMOUNT OF VIOLENCE IN FILMS AND ON TELEVISION IN ORDER TO DECREASE THE VIOLENT CRIMES IN SOCIETY. IN WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?
Whether the government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the vioelnt crimes in society involves a conflict between our right of free speech and the duty of the government to protect its citizenry from potential harm. In my view, our societal interest in preventing the harm that exposure to vioelence produces takes recedence over the rights of individuals to broadcast this type of content.
First of all, I believe that exposure to violence does indeed cause similar behaviour on the part of those who are exposed to it. Although we may not have conclusive scientific evidence of a cause â?" effect relationship, ample anecdotal evidence establishes a significant correlation. Moreover, both common sense and our experiences with children inform us that people tend to mimic the behaviour they are exposed to.
Secondly, I believe that violence is indeed harmful to a society. The harm it produces is, in my view, both palpable and profound. For the individual, it has a debasing impact on vital human relationships; for the society, it promotes a tendency toward antisocial behaviour. Both outcomes, in turn, tear apart the social fabric that holds a society together.
Those who advocate unbridled individual expression might point out that the right of free speech is intrinsic to a democracy and necessary to its survival. Even so, this right is not absolute, nor is it the most critical element. In my assessment, the interests served by restricting violence in broadcast media are, on balance, more crucial to the survival of a society.
In sum, it is our best interest as a society for the government to censor broadcast media for violence. Exposure *****ch media content tends to harm society and its citizenry in ways that are worth preventing, even in light of the resulting infringement of our right of free expression.

HW E29 nào
1. Advanced Future
2. Academic Reading 1
3. Mọi người đã học hôm thứ 7 (18/4) thì nộp bài viết đoạn văn về 1 nét văn hóa. Và nghỉ thứ 7 tới Còn lại ai đi học hôm chủ nhật thì tuần này chủ nhật vẫn học bình thường.
4. Bài dịch : chép theo đơn vị câu, cách dòng, phân tích S-V-O và dịch trước ở nhà. Bài này chưa phải làm ngay, cứ làm dần dần chắc tuần sau mới học.
Chúc cả nhà tuần mới vui vẻ

Cuối tuần này mình sẽ thông báo cho cả lớp về lịch nghỉ 30/4-1/5 nhé
Đợt vừa rồi chuyển nhà mình ko online được, nên có nhiều cái các bạn hỏi mình đã giải đáp trực tiếp. Giờ nhà mình chuyển ở gần lớp học hiện tại, nên bạn nào có nghỉ học và muốn hẹn mình lâý tài liệu thì cứ alô/sms hẹn mình tại lớp học luôn nhé.

Lịch học tuần từ 20/4 đến 26/4 - Lớp E31:
Thứ 4 (22/4) lớp E31 nghỉ học nhé.
Thứ 5, thứ 7 và CN đi học bình thường.
Các bạn nghe trước bài Test two ở nhà, thứ 5 và thứ 7 sẽ học.

hi mọi người, cùng share kinh nghiệm thì IELTS nhé
meohong_nga87@yahoo.com
Mình là plan leader ở bên IESC ( IELTS Speaking club)
trong nhóm mình ai cũng từ 6.5 trở lên cả, mà đa số mọi người đều từ 7.0 trở lên.

Lớp 30 thân mến,
Mọi người nhớ hôm nay học từ 6.30pm nhá

SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT STUDENTS WHO WANT TO GO TO UNIVERSITY AFTER GRADUATION FROM HIGH SCHOOL SHOULD HAVE ABOUT ONE YEARâ?TS TIME TO GET A JOB TO OBTAIN WORK EXPERIENCE OR HAVE A TRAVEL TO ENLARGE THEIR VISION. IN WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?
In this competitive society, employment experience and abundant information have become very important features of ordinary studentsâ?T future. Nevertheless, it does not seem many holders of a high school diploma should apply for a job or travel before being enrolled in the university. The above point is certainly true; this essay will outline three reasons.
The main reason is that studentsâ?T study will be delayed and disadvantaged. The academic knowledge of students will not progress. In this special period of life, students have the best memory and intellect. If they do not work hard at study, they will lose it and that cannot be compensated by good salary or wide information. If they choose to straight away enroll at university, they would gain a better future.
Another reason is that knowledge of students is not enough to keep them cope with work requirements. Many holders of a high school diploma are taught that the subjects are too academic. They are not trained for professional technology in practice, so they find it difficult to get opportunities of employment. Only limited and ordinary opportunities of work are provided to students; it is just a dream that means they could not obtain plenty of work experience.
Last but not least reason is the students whose mental capacity is not sufficient to understand complex interpersonal relationships. Holders of a high school diploma are so young that they are not good at interpersonal communicating skills. In ad***ion, the adult world is too dangerous and unreadable to students who donâ?Tt have strong ability of analysis.
In conclusion, the students ought to keep on studying in university after they finish their courses in high school, and attending to study is definitely right in school. It is my firmly held view that students should not give up study just for the experience of employment and abundant information.