1. Tuyển Mod quản lý diễn đàn. Các thành viên xem chi tiết tại đây

bắc triều tiên hổ thật hay hổ giấy.

Chủ đề trong 'Giáo dục quốc phòng' bởi toi_et_moi, 02/07/2002.

  1. 1 người đang xem box này (Thành viên: 0, Khách: 1)
  1. toi_et_moi

    toi_et_moi Thành viên mới

    Tham gia ngày:
    13/03/2002
    Bài viết:
    21
    Đã được thích:
    0
    bắc triều tiên hổ thật hay hổ giấy.

    quân đôi của bắc triều tiên có mạnh thật không ,như la nhưng gì mà một số nước phương tây dựng nên không.theo một số chuyên gia quân sự thì quân đội băc triều tiên không mạnh như nhưng gi phương tây dưng nên .với số quân khoảng một triêu quân ,chi phí quốc phòng một tỷ dola .quân đội băc triều tiên có dủ các loại vu khí như tên lửa tấm xa ,tau ngâm .máy bay ......
    nhưng quân đôi bắc triêu tiên chỉ như quân đội trung quốc nhưng nam 60 .vỡi nhưng trang thiết bị quân sự vũ khí chủ yếu là thuộc thế hệ vũ khí thứ 2,3 .rất lạc hậu .người ta thấy quân dôi băc chiều tiên bâygio vẫn còn sử dụng những chiến xa t-34 ,cu kỹ .cón tên lửa do bắc triều tiên san xuất thi phần lớn bị nổ trên đuòng bay khi phóng .các chuyên gia quân sự phương tây khi quan sát mười ba bãi phóng tên lủa cua btt đã vô cùng kinh ngạc về sự lac hậu của nó .quân đôi băc triếu tiên cùng dùng toan may bay lac hậu mua lại của các nước khác .
  2. Evil-Metal

    Evil-Metal Thành viên quen thuộc

    Tham gia ngày:
    14/05/2002
    Bài viết:
    376
    Đã được thích:
    0
    Không phải hổ giấy mà là chó giấy.
    Mấy quả tên lửa với bom nguyên tử được Nga cho để gây mất ổn định thôi, bọn nó còn lâu mới đủ đầu óc chế ra.
    www.rockcafe.vze.com

    IN METAL WE TRUST
  3. lekien

    lekien Thành viên quen thuộc

    Tham gia ngày:
    01/01/2001
    Bài viết:
    698
    Đã được thích:
    0
    Trên NET có nói đến Bắc Triều Tiên có Tăng T-80 và Mig-29
    'Scarecrow': Chinese and Russian Cooperation With North Korea
    Dr. Alexandr Nemets and Dr. Thomas Torda
    Wednesday, Dec. 26, 2001
    Since the collapse of the former Soviet Union, relations between Moscow and Pyongyang have been almost frozen as the "democratic new Russia" has demonstrated its disdain for and negligence toward the "last hard-line Communist regime."
    In 1992-98 North Korean relations with China, its last formal ally, also stalled at a low level. Chinese aid to devastated and starving North Korea has been limited to donations of several hundred thousand tons of oil products and grain annually.
    Prominent American sinologist Dr. Robert Scalapino (from the University of California at Berkeley) stated in 1992, soon after the establishment of diplomatic relations between Beijing and Seoul: "China has, on the Korean peninsula, the unloved legal wife [North Korea] and the beloved concubine [South Korea]."
    Indeed, as early as 1992, trade volume between China and South Korea was at least five times that between China and North Korea. In 1998, Chinese-South Korean trade surpassed $21 billion, while Sino-North Korean trade fell to a miserable $413 million. This latter figure included Chinese exports valued at $355 million, of which about $300 million was, in effect, economic assistance to Pyongyang.
    In July 1994, just after the death of Supreme Leader Kim Il Song, Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping sent a high-ranking "private envoy" (a member of Communist Party of China's Central Committee) to new Supreme Leader Kim Jong-Il with a "secret letter" containing an urgent recommendation: "Begin reforms as soon as possible!" The letter was ignored and Sino-North Korean relations remained at a standstill for several more years.
    However, even during this period North Korean companies purchased from the rich Chinese electronics and machinery markets some key assemblies and spare parts needed for development and production of conventional and strategic nuclear arms. North Korea's development and August 31, 1998, test-launch of the Taepodong strategic missile, with a range of at least 3,000 miles, probably would have been impossible without Chinese indirect assistance of this kind.
    Upgrading of Sino-North Korean ties began in the second half of 1999 and dramatically escalated in 2000-2001. This process is characterized by exchanges of visits between the two sides' top leaders and significant expansion of Chinese assistance of all kind, including military-technological aid.
    As a result, North Korea has acquired new capabilities in development and production of the most dangerous weapons ?^s short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles, chemical weapons and bioweapons. North Korea has exported some of these arms to Middle Eastern countries such as Iran, Syria and Libya ?^s directly or indirectly supporting terrorist movements and groups.
    Reportedly, Pyongyang has even managed to find some ways to provide missile technology to Saddam's regime.
    It should be emphasized that Beijing precisely coordinates with Moscow its policy and assistance toward North Korea. Thus, upgraded Beijing-Pyongyang ties in effect coincide with upgraded Moscow-Pyongyang ties.
    Following are some recent major events characterizing Chinese and Russian relations with North Korea:
    · In October 1999, chief of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Staff, Lt. Gen. Fu Quanyou, visited North Korea and vigorously promoted PLA ties with the Korean People's Army.
    · In February 2000 in Pyongyang, Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov signed a "Russian-North Korean Treaty on Friendship, Good Neighbor Relations and Cooperation." In reality, this meant the spread of the emerging Sino-Russian alliance to North Korea. As a result, in the second half of 1999 and the first half of 2000, North Korea intensified its buildup of military capabilities, particularly the development of long-range missiles. North Korean deliveries of missile technology also expanded to include Iran, Syria, Libya and even Egypt.
    · In late May 2000, North Korean Supreme Leader Kim Jong-Il paid a secret visit to Beijing, thus pulling Pyongyang out of its decade-long self-isolation.
    · In June 2000, Russian President Vladimir Putin visited North Korea and with Kim Jong-Il concluded a series of pacts on modernization of military and economic facilities built earlier in North Korea with Soviet aid. At the same time, the two countries agreed to coordinate their policies toward the U.S., Japan and South Korea. These agreements have been appreciated and hailed in Beijing.
    · In the latter half of 2000, Chinese and Russian assistance became substantial factors in the acceleration of North Korea's ballistic missile program as well as its programs to develop nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.
    · In April 2001 ?^s during the tense crisis in Sino-U.S. relations over the collision of a Chinese fighter (lost in the sea) with a U.S. reconnaissance plane (forced to land on Hainan Island and subsequently occupied by the Chinese) ?^s Pyongyang officially stated that it will launch attacks on the U.S. (or at least against U.S. forces in South Korea and Japan) if America and Japan go ahead with plans to construct an East Asian theater missile defense (TMD) system or irritate North Korea in any other way.
    One week later, in Moscow, North Korean Defense Minister Kim Il-Chon signed a series of Russian-arms-related agreements ?^s first of all, on Russian deliveries of fighter aircraft to the Korean People's Army and Russian assistance in the modernization of North Korea's defense industry. Again, these agreements were hailed in Beijing.
    · In early July 2001, Chinese parliament Deputy Chairman Jiang Chunyun visited North Korea in what the media called "the first visit of a Chinese high-ranking official in many years" and further upgraded ties between the two nations in all areas. Some 10 days later, during Chinese President Jiang Zemin's visit to Moscow to sign the Sino-Russian Good Neighbor Treaty, the two sides once more coordinated their policies toward North Korea.
    From this point on, North Korea can be considered as a "smart tool" of China and Russia in Northeast Asia. Beijing uses the North Korean tool to put pressure on South Korea, Japan and the U.S. The epochal visit of Kim Jong-Il to Russia in August 2001 confirmed and enhanced this "scarecrow" role for the Pyongyang regime.
    Beijing and Moscow, with the active assistance of their Pyongyang "scarecrow," have spared no efforts to "engage" South Korea and to remove it from the U.S. sphere of influence.
    · Jiang Zemin's visit to North Korea on Sept. 3-5, 2001, focused on North Korea's role in stabilizing the Korean peninsula. At the same moment, Beijing media published articles calling for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from South Korea. This coincided with a new Russian proposal to expand the Trans-Siberian Railway to Pyongyang and Seoul, as well as to construct a pipeline from the natural gas deposits in the Irkutsk Region of Eastern Siberia to South Korea, via North Korean territory.
    · During the last months of 2001, North Korea ?^s evidently with Beijing's and Moscow's blessings ?^s redoubled its efforts toward development of chemical and biological warfare. This was accompanied by a new "anti-imperialist" propaganda campaign in the Pyongyang media.
    Without doubt, by the end of 2001, the Pyongyang regime has become a useful ally of both China and Russia in Northeast Asia, as well as a smart middleman in supplying very dangerous "asymmetric technologies" (chemical and biological weapon technologies)" and short-to-intermediate-range ballistic missiles to rogue countries of the Middle East.
    In effect, North Korea has become a "department store" for these nations of concern and for terrorist movements interested in acquiring missile and chemical-biological warfare technologies.
    North Korea's development of nuclear arms is also proceeding apace. Simultaneously, China and Russia are guaranteeing the safety of the Pyongyang regime against possible retaliatory strikes by U.S. or Japanese forces.
    Dr. Alexandr V. Nemets is a consultant to the American Foreign Policy Council. He is co-author of "Chinese-Russian Military Relations, Fate of Taiwan and New Geopolitics."
    Dr. Thomas J. Torda has been a Chinese linguist specializing in science and technology with FBIS, and a Chinese/Russian defense technology consultant with the Office of Naval Intelligence.
    NORTH KOREA STARTED TO ASSEMBLE MIG-29S

    Late in 1998, North Korea procured the MiG-29 fighter parts and assemblies from Russia. Presently, the country has launched the assembly of these fighters, a high-ranking South-Korean official has been quoted to say.
    "Proceeding from the number of parts and assemblies delivered to North Korea, we have come to a conclusion, that the country has procured a batch of ten Russian fighters", he said. In the words of the source, this deal is a part of the North Korean Air Force modernisation pogramme, in the framework of which the country is planning to procure a total of 40 MiG-29 fighters. This, Phyongyang believes, will allow the North-Korean Air Force to carry out aerial operations over the entire territory of the Korean Peninsula.
    Presently, the source says, the North Korean Air Force has in service 16 MiG-29 fighters, assembled from parts procured in Russia back in 1989. The latest Russian-North Korean deal made South Korea and the US look for possible sources of financing used by North Korea to cover the corresponding expen***ure.
    29 ап??еля 2001, 19:55. Россия обеспе??и?, о???fжием Севе??н?f?Z ?sо??е?Z
    Россия соби??ае?,ся п??ода?,?O Севе??ной ?sо??ее о???fжие на с?fмм?f в 500 миллионов долла??ов. ?Y??едполагае?,ся, ???,о Россия б?fде?, пос?,авля?,?O в Севе??н?f?Z ?sо??е?Z самоле?,?С, ко?,о???<е мог?f?, следи?,?O за дейс?,виями аме??икански?. и ?Zжноко??ейски?. военн?<?., пл?Zс нескол?Oко небол?O?^и?. па?,???fл?Oн?<?. ка?,е??ов.?s??емл?O догово??ился об о?,п??авке в Севе??н?f?Z ?sо??е?Z военн?<?. инжене??ов, ко?,о???<е должн?< помо???O ?Y?.ен?Oян?f моде??низи??ова?,?O обо???fдование по сбо??ке ?,анков и д???fги?. воо???fжений.Россияне ?f?,ве??жда?Z?,, ???,о вся э?,а ?,е?.ника - обо??они?,ел?Oная и не самая сов??еменная. Тем не менее, сделка имее?, важное зна??ение для севе??око??ейски?. воо???fженн?<?. сил; на нее пойде?, ?,??е?,?O военного б?Zдже?,а."?'олее деся?,и ле?, Россия по???,и не подде??живала о?,но?^ений с Севе??ной ?sо??еей, - под??е??кн?fл ??оссийский экспе???, Се??гей ?'лаговолин. - С п??и?.одом ?Y?f?,ина си?,?fа??ия изменилас?O. ?zн наме??ен восс?,анови?,?O влияние в ??егионе и с?,а?,?O для ко??ей??ев сил?Oн?<м пос??едником в о?,но?^ения?. с ?-ападом. ?"ля ?s??емля л?f???^ий п?f?,?O для дос?,ижения э?,ой ??ели - п??одажа о???fжия".?Y?f?,ин назна??ил ви??е-п??ем?Oе??а ?~л?O?Z ?sлебанова, о?,ве?,с?,венного за пос?,авки воо???fжений, главой коми?,е?,а, ко?,о???<й б?fде?, к?f??и??ова?,?O о?,но?^ения с Севе??ной ?sо??еей.Э?,а сделка сл?fжи?, последним свиде?,ел?Oс?,вом сближения межд?f ?s??емлем и Севе??ной ?sо??еей - одним из последни?. гос?fда??с?,в со с?,алинис?,ским ??ежимом. ?' след?f?Z??ем меся??е ?sим должен посе?,и?,?O ?oоскв?f в о?,ве?, на п??о?^логодний визи?, ?Y?f?,ина в ?Y?.ен?Oян, когда пе??егово???< межд?f дв?fмя лиде??ами п??одолжалис?O вдвое дол?O?^е заплани??ованного. ?Y?f?,ин назвал ??едко появля?Z??егося на п?fблике дик?,а?,о??а, ???Oя поли?,ика зас?,авила более ??ем дв?f?.миллионное население с?,??ан?< ?,е??пе?,?O жес?,окие ли?^ения, "абсол?Z?,но сов??еменн?<м ??еловеком", ?.о??о?^о ??азби??а?Z??имся в ми??овой поли?,ике.Российский лиде?? заявил ?,акже, ???,о ?sим о?,каже?,ся о?, ??аке?,ной п??ог??амм?<, однако впоследс?,вии дик?,а?,о?? взял об??а?,но свои слова, сказав, ???,о э?,о б?<ла "?^?f?,ка".?"осдепа???,амен?, США никак не п??окоммен?,и??овал ин?"о??ма??и?Z о п??едполагаем?<?. ??оссийски?. пос?,авка?.. Тем не менее, ?'а?^инг?,он с??и?,ае?, Севе??н?f?Z ?sо??е?Z гос?fда??с?,вом-изгоем, а обеспокоеннос?,?O севе??око??ейской ??аке?,ной п??ог??аммой с?,ала одной из п??и??ин, по ко?,о??ой п??езиден?, ?"жо??дж ?'?f?^ наме??ен ?fско??и?,?O создание п??о?,иво??аке?,ного ??и?,а."Аме??икан???< б?fд?f?, о??ен?O ??ассе??жен?<, - под??е??кн?fл один из западн?<?. диплома?,ов в ?oоскве. - Севе??ная ?sо??ея ?fже задолжала ???fсским 3 мл??д. долла??ов, ко?,о???<е она не може?, в?<пла?,и?,?O. С комме????еской ?,о??ки з??ения э?,а сделка не имее?, см?<сла. Э?,о ??ис?,о поли?,и??еское дело".
    NK SEEKING PURCHASE OF MISSILES FROM RUSSIA
    The Korea Times reported that an ROK military source said Tuesday that the DPRK has been seeking to purchase Russian interceptor missiles and assemble Russian fighters in its territory. "It is highly likely that North Korea will buy S-300 interceptor missiles from Russia by the end of the year," the source said, noting that DPRK and Russia, through a basic agreement signed by the two nations in February last year, have been increasing defense equipment transactions. "I understand that the two countries were discussing ways to allow North Korea to assemble Russia's SU-27 or MiG-29 fighters in North Korea," the source said. Russia has also been discussing the sale of 10 BTR-80 armored personnel carriers and 100 BMP tanks to the DPRK, the source added. [Ed. note: This article was included in the US Department of Defense's Early Bird news service for February 7, 2001.] ("NK SEEKING PURCHASE OF MISSILES FROM RUSSIA," Seoul, 02/07/01)
    Э?,о моде??низа??ия севе??око??ейской ?,яжелой п??ом?<?^леннос?,и, соединение межко??ейской железной до??оги с Т??анссиби??ской магис?,??ал?O?Z и п??иоб??е?,ение новей?^его ??оссийского о???fжия. Уже сей??ас можно с в?<сокой долей ве??оя?,нос?,и п??едположи?,?O, ???,о согласие по пе??в?<м дв?fм п?fнк?,ам б?fде?, дос?,игн?f?,о. Россия пол?f??и?, п??ек??асн?f?Z возможнос?,?O ?fсили?,?O свое влияние на ?sо??ейском пол?fос?,??ове и с?,а?,?O пос??едником в кон?,ак?,а?. ?Y?.ен?Oяна с д???fгими с?,??анами. ?.с?,?O ин?"о??ма??ия, ???,о во в??емя вс?,??е??и с ?sим Чен ?~??ом 4 и 5 авг?fс?,а ?'ладими?? ?Y?f?,ин поп?<?,ае?,ся ?fбеди?,?O его о?,каза?,?Oся о?, ??еализа??ии севе??око??ейской п??ог??амм?< по ??азве???,?<вани?Z баллис?,и??ески?. ??аке?, - вед?O именно э?,и план?< ?Y?.ен?Oяна испол?Oз?fе?, ?'а?^инг?,он в ка??ес?,ве оп??авдания своей сис?,еме п??о?,иво??аке?,ной обо??он?<. ?.??е для России о??ен?O в?<годно "п??оп?fс?,и?,?O" ??е??ез сво?Z ?,е????и?,о??и?Z зна??и?,ел?Oн?f?Z ??ас?,?O ?,??анспо???,н?<?. по?,оков из ?'ос?,о??ной Азии, вкл?Z??ая обе ?sо??еи, Япони?Z и ?sи?,ай, в ?.в??оп?f. ?Yол?Oза о?, нового железнодо??ожного ма???^???f?,а о??евидна и для соседей Севе??ной ?sо??еи, ?,акже заин?,е??есованн?<?. в ?fвели??ении г???fзопо?,ока и об?Sемов ?,о??говли. С о???fжием сложнее. ?' ?oоскве п??ек??асно понима?Z?,, ???,о, воо???fжив севе??око??ейск?f?Z а??ми?Z, Россия немин?fемо пол?f??и?, о?.лаждение о?,но?^ений с Южной ?sо??еей, Японией и Соединенн?<ми Ш?,а?,ами. ?Yо ин?"о??ма??ии неко?,о???<?. за???fбежн?<?. С?o?~, сс?<ла?Z??и?.ся на ис?,о??ники в ??оссийски?. спе??сл?fжба?., на самми?,е "вос?Oме??ки" в ?"ен?fе ?"жо??дж ?'?f?^ ли??но п??осил ?'ладими??а ?Y?f?,ина не п??одава?,?O о???fжия севе??око??ей??ам. ?sо?,о???<?. ин?,е??ес?f?Z?, след?f?Z??ие об??аз???< ??оссийски?. воо???fжений. Э?,о, п??ежде всего, ?,анки. На 7-й ден?O своего п?f?,е?^ес?,вия ?sим Чен ?~?? посе?,ил завод в ?zмске, где п??оизводи?,ся ?,анк Т-80 - одна из сам?<?. сов??еменн?<?. ??оссийски?. ма?^ин. ?~?. п??иоб??е?,ение озна??ало б?< для Севе??ной ?sо??еи обновление своего ?,анкового па??ка - э?,о около 4.000 сове?,ски?. Т-34, Т-54, и Т-62, н?<не безнадежно ?fс?,а??ев?^и?.. ?.??е севе??око??ей??ам ?.о?,елос?O б?< к?fпи?,?O нескол?Oко с?,о??ожев?<?. ко??аблей, ??аке?, С-300 - класса "земля-возд?f?." и ис?,??еби?,елей ?o?~?"-29 - вмес?,о с?,а???<?. ?o?~?"-17 и ?o?~?"-19. Российские сомнения по повод?f п??одажи о???fжия ?Y?.ен?Oян?f с?,али п??и??иной о?,с??о??ки визи?,а ?sим Чен ?~??а. ?Yе??вона??ал?Oно его п??иезд плани??овался на ап??ел?O, но б?<л о?,ложен, ?,ак как во в??емя п??едва??и?,ел?Oн?<?. пе??егово??ов согласие в воп??осе зак?fпки ?,ак и не б?<ло дос?,игн?f?,о. Сегодня?^ний п??иезд севе??око??ейского ???fководи?,еля може?, озна??а?,?O, ???,о какой-?,о комп??омисс все же дос?,игн?f?,, и воп??ос в ?,ом, ??его и скол?Oко ?oосква ??е?^и?, п??ода?,?O ?Y?.ен?Oян?f. ?Yо о??енке ??оссийски?. и ?Zжноко??ейски?. спе??иалис?,ов Севе??ная ?sо??ея го?,ова п??иоб??ес?,и ?f России воо???fжений на с?fмм?f о?, 200 до 500 миллионов долла??ов. ?'оп??ос в ?,ом, как она б?fде?, пла?,и?,?O - ден?Oгами или ??ас?,ян?f?,?<ми на деся?,иле?,ия пос?,авками.
    Россия обеспе??и?, о???fжием Севе??н?f?Z ?sо??е?Z
    Россия соби??ае?,ся п??ода?,?O Севе??ной ?sо??ее о???fжие на с?fмм?f в 500 миллионов долла??ов, сооб??ае?, The Sunday Times со сс?<лкой на "?.о??о?^о осведомленн?<е ис?,о??ники".
    ?Y??едполагае?,ся, ???,о Россия б?fде?, пос?,авля?,?O в Севе??н?f?Z ?sо??е?Z самоле?,?< ?oиг-29, сис?,ем?< п??о?,ивовозд?f?^ной обо??он?< С?f-27, самоле?,?<-?^пион?< "?Y??ела-1", ??ада???<, способн?<е следи?,?O за военн?<ми манев??ами США и Южной ?sо??еи, а ?,акже нескол?Oко па?,???fл?Oн?<?. ко??аблей.
    Хо?,я ??оссийская с?,о??она под??е??кивае?,, ???,о пос?,авляемое о???fжие в?<полняе?, искл?Z??и?,ел?Oно обо??онн?f?Z ?"?fнк??и?Z, сделка, ве??оя?,нее всего, в?<зове?, сил?Oное недовол?Oс?,во США.
    "Аме??икан???< б?fд?f?, в я??ос?,и. - заме?,ил один из западн?<?. диплома?,ов в ?oоскве, - Севе??ная ?sо??ея ?fже задолжала России ?,??и миллиа??да долла??ов, ко?,о???<е не може?, запла?,и?,?O. С комме????еской ?,о??ки з??ения э?,а сделка бессм?<сленна. ?-дес?O ??е???O иде?, о поли?,ике".
    Được lekien sửa chữa / chuyển vào 03/07/2002 ngày 18:05

Chia sẻ trang này