Bài về môn economy trên trưòng! moi nguoi rảnh thì vào đọc hen !Rảnh thì sửa luon giùm Gor !

Bài về môn economy trên trưòng! moi nguoi rảnh thì vào đọc hen !Rảnh thì sửa luon giùm Gor !

Distinguish between private costs and benefits and social costs and benefits:

Private costs represent those costs incurred by the producer of a good or service in a given transaction. These are reflects the opportunity cost, to the individual producer, of the resources that went into the production of the good or service. Conversely, private benefits are the gains to the individual consumer or arising from the consumption of o good or service. This is reflected by the price that a consumer pays for something. Private costs and benefits, do not, however, take into consideration the potential spillover effects to third parties. These are the costs and benefits to society, which remain external to producer?Ts and consumer?Ts thinking. There are thusly dubbed negative and positive externalities respectively. When the cost/price of a good or service, does not reflect these externalities, resources are misallocated, and market failure occurs. To remedy, externalities must be accounted for internalized.

Social costs take into account the negative exterminalities that production might have on society, while social benefits account for the positive externalities that consumption might have on society. Essentially, they take into account not only the costs and benefits to individual producers and consumers in a transaction, but to third parties as well. As an equation social cost and social benefit are so represented: social costs= private costs+ negative externalities; social benefits= private benefits + positive externalities.

An example of private and social costs might be seen if we look at a pig farm. The private costs of keeping this pig farm in operation might include the cost of feeding the animals, and washing the facilities. These are the costs taken into consideration by the pig farmer, while producing his goods. Say this farmer was to dumb all his pigs?T waste into a nearby river than paying for proper disposal. The costs to the environment and the people that use river, in terms of the fecal contamination are external to the farmer?Ts thinking. This spillover effect on society is taken into account by social cost however.

A private benefit might involve someone deciding to take public transport to work. This would be the gain the consumer/commuter derives from using the bus, train etc. to reach his/her destination. This too has spillover effects on society, but in this case positive. By choosing to ride public transport the consumer doesn?Tt add to the congestion, pollution, or noise that would be a cost to society if he/she rode the car. This benefit to society, external to the consumer?Ts thinking, is taken into account by social benefit.




WHAT DO WE LIVE FOR, IF NOT TO MAKE LIFE LESS DIFFICULT FOR ONE ANOTHER

Được sửa chữa bởi - gorillaz on 16/01/2002 16:35

refresh ! People ignored me ! No one wants to reply ! Never mind ! huhuhuhuh !
Bad E!
BN
I'm not like them, but I can pretend.
The sun is gone, but I have a light.
The day is done, but I'm having fun.
I think I'm dumb or maybe just happy...think I'm just happy.

Đúng hết rồi còn sửa cái gì nữa? Em Gor dạo này học Econ có vẻ khá lên nhiều thế nhỉ. Lấy ví dụ về social, private cost và benefit đúng quá.
BE YOUR SELF AS THOSE WHO MATTER DONT CARE AND THOSE WHO CARE DONT MATTER

I asked u to correct my grammar cơ muh ! hic ! Is my grammar correct?
BN
I'm not like them, but I can pretend.
The sun is gone, but I have a light.
The day is done, but I'm having fun.
I think I'm dumb or maybe just happy...think I'm just happy.

I think you need to restruture some sentences in this paper to get things clear. Although I understand most of what you've written, I think you were thinking in Vietnamese and tried to translate your work into English. That is not a good way to write a paper in English, though. You have to think in English and then write down your thoughts to keep the sentences go smoothly from the beginning to the end.
Good luck on your project.
Distinguish between private costs and benefits and social costs and benefits:
Private costs ARE THE costs incurred by the producer of a good or service FROM a given transaction. {These COSTS reflects the opportunity cost, to the individual producer, of the resources that AUE USED TO PRODUCE that good or service.---I'm not sure that I understand this sentece correctly} IN CONTRAST, private benefits are the gains to the individual consumer or THE RISING CONSUMPTION of a good or service. (What does this THIS stand for--This is reflected by the price that a consumer pays for something.) Private costs and benefits, do not, however, {take into consideration the potential spillover effects to third parties -- struture? hard to understand}. {These COSTS/BENEFITS -- don't use these/those/this/that alone for everything you've said. It's hard to follow -- are the costs and benefits to society, which remain external to producerâ?Ts and consumerâ?Ts thinking. THUS, there are {dubbed -- word choice} negative and positive externalities respectively. { When the cost/price of a good or service, does not reflect these externalities, resources are misallocated, and market failure occurs -- not a complete sentence though}. {To remedy, externalities must be accounted for internalized. this one too, you're trying to translate from VNese into English }
Social costs take into account the negative exterminalities that production might (i think you don't need "might" here because it's true in economics right?, correct me if i'm wrong) have on society, while social benefits account for the positive externalities that consumption might have on society. Essentially, they take into account not only the costs and benefits to individual producers and consumers in a transaction, but to third parties as well. {As an equation social cost and social benefit are so represented: social costs= private costs+ negative externalities; social benefits= private benefits + positive externalities.} How about : So, the equation of social costs and social benefits can be written as, social costs= private costs+ negative externalities; social benefits= private benefits + positive externalities
{An example of private and social costs might be seen if we look at a pig farm.} How about : Consider a pig farm as an example of private and social costs. The private costs TO OPERATE this pig farm include the cost of feeding the animals, and washing the facilities. These are the costs taken into consideration by the pig farmer, while producing his goods. Say this farmer was to dumb all his pigsâ?T waste into a nearby river than paying for proper disposal. The costs to the environment and the people that use river, in terms of the fecal contamination are external to the farmerâ?Ts thinking. This spillover effect on society is taken into account by social cost however.
A private benefit might involve someone deciding to take public transport to COMMUTE. This would be the gain the consumer/commuter derives from using the bus, train etc. to reach his/her destination. This too has spillover effects on society; HOWEVER IT IS positive in this case. By choosing to ride public transportation the consumer doesnâ?Tt {add to -- word choice} the congestion, pollution, or noise that would be a cost to society if he/she rode the car. This benefit to society, external to the consumerâ?Ts thinking, is taken into account by social benefit.

Distinguish between private costs and benefits and social costs and benefits:
Private costs represent those costs incurred by the producer of a good or service in a given transaction. These REFLECT the opportunity cost, to the individual producer, of the resources that went into the production of the good or service. Conversely, private benefits are the gains to the individual consumer or arising from the consumption of o good or service. This is reflected by the price that a consumer pays for something. Private costs and benefits, do not, however, take into consideration the potential spillover effects to third parties. These are the costs and benefits to society, which remain external to producer??Ts and consumer??Ts thinking. There are thusly dubbed negative and positive externalities respectively. When the cost/price of a good or service, does not reflect these externalities, resources are misallocated, and market failure occurs. To remedy, externalities must be accounted for INTERNALIZATION.
Social costs take into account the negative exterminalities that production might have on society, while social benefits account for the positive externalities that consumption might have on society. Essentially, they take into account not only the costs and benefits to individual producers and consumers in a transaction, but to third parties as well. As an equation social cost and social benefit are so represented: social costs= private costs+ negative externalities; social benefits= private benefits + positive externalities.
An example of private and social costs might be seen if we look at a pig farm. The private costs of keeping this pig farm in operation might include the cost of feeding the animals, and washing the facilities. These are the costs taken into consideration by the pig farmer, while producing his goods. Say this farmer was to dumb all his pigs??T waste into a nearby river than paying for proper disposal. The costs to the environment and the people that use river, in terms of the fecal contamination are external to the farmer??Ts thinking. This spillover effect on society is taken into account by social cost however.
A private benefit might involve someone deciding to take public transport to work. This would be the gain the consumer/commuter derives from using the bus, train etc. to reach his/her destination. This too has spillover effects on society, but in this case positive. By choosing to ride public transport the consumer doesn??Tt add to the congestion, pollution, or noise that would be a cost to society if he/she rode the car. This benefit to society, external to the consumer??Ts thinking, is taken into account by social benefit.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Em Gor viết bài này à? Khá quá đi mất... Cái mà anh sửa chắc chỉ là typo thôi. Em viết thế này thì như Textbook về Econ rồi còn gì
Trình độ thế này thì vào UCLA ngon ơ em ạ.
Keep up the good work.
To bác gì ở Chicago: bác sửa bài của em Gor thế nào chứ lại sửa thành mất cả hay đi thế. Chắc bác không học Econ nên có những đoạn bác không hiểu
BE YOUR SELF AS THOSE WHO MATTER DONT CARE AND THOSE WHO CARE DONT MATTER
Được sửa chữa bởi - longatum vào 16/02/2002 05:38

Ok, never mind...
keep up your "GOOD" work.

Hì, bác tnaduy sao mà lại viết kiểu cay cú thế kia. Em tình thực với bác, bài em Gor viết rất xuất sắc mà bác sửa xong đọc nhiều đoạn thấy chuối cực bác ạ... bác bảo em Gor nghĩ bằng tiếng Việt rồi mới dịch ra tiếng Anh, em thấy đấy là bệnh của bác đấy ạ.
Giờ em đi học tẹo, lát nữa xong em về em chỉ cho bác xem nhá.
mà em Gor cấm gọi anh bằng CHÚ nữa nhá... gọi bằng ANH, nghe chưa.
BE YOURSELF AS THOSE WHO MATTER DONT CARE AND THOSE WHO CARE DONT MATTER
Được sửa chữa bởi - longatum vào 16/02/2002 00:35

Private costs ARE THE ("REPRESENT" SOUNDS MUCH BETTER THAN THE UNCOMPLICATED "ARE THE") costs incurred by the producer of a good or service FROM ("IN" IS DEFINITELY RIGHT, "FROM" MAKES THE SENTENCE SOUND FALSE) a given transaction. {These COSTS (DOES THE SENTENCE SOUND BETTER TO YOU WITH TWO "COST" RATHER THAN ONE? ) reflects the opportunity cost, to the individual producer, of the resources that AUE USED TO PRODUCE (IT SEEMS TO ME YOU ARE QUITE A SIMPLISTIC KIND OF WRITER WHEN YOU CHOOSE TO USE THE BORING "ARE USED"-should be "were used" indeed- FOR THE MORE CREATIVE "WENT INTO" that good or service.---I'm not sure that I understand this sentece correctly (THIS SENTENCE, THOUGH A LITTLE COMPLEX, IS NOT HARD TO UNDERSTAND, DUDE. PUT YOUR MIND IN IT A LITTLE MORE AND WITH SOME KNOWLEDGE OF ECON YOU WILL GET THE MEANING)} IN CONTRAST, private benefits are the gains to the individual consumer or THE RISING CONSUMPTION (HERE, AS I SAID BEFORE, YOU CORRECTION SHOWS THAT YOU HAVE QUITE LITTLE UNDERSTANDING OF ECONOMICS. READ THE SENTENCE AGAIN AND HOPE IT WILL MAKE SOME SENSE TO YOU. I HAVE TO ADMIT, THOUGH, THAT IT IS A LITTLE MORE COMPLEX OF A SENTENCE.) of a good or service. (What does this THIS (LET ME ANSWER THIS TO YOU: THIS HERE STANDS FOR "THE FACT THAT + THE LATTER PART OF THE ABOVE SENTENCE) stand for--This is reflected by the price that a consumer pays for something.) Private costs and benefits, do not, however, {take into consideration the potential spillover effects to third parties -- struture? hard to understand (WHAT CONFUSES YOU IN THIS SENTENCE? SPILLOVER EFFECTS? WELL, SEARCH FOR IT ON THE INTERNET. TAKES ONLY A FEW SECONDS I'M TELLING YOU)}. {These COSTS/BENEFITS -- don't use these/those/this/that alone for everything you've said. It's hard to follow (IT IS NOT HARD TO FOLLOW, DUDE. ADDINGS THAT "COSTS/BENEFITS" MAKE THE SENTENCE NOT ONLY SOUND WORSE BUT ALSO LOOK WORSE)-- are the costs and benefits to society, which remain external to producer??Ts and consumer??Ts thinking. THUS, there are {dubbed -- word choice ("THUSLY DUBBED" IS INDEED A MORE ADVANCED WAY OF WRITING. NO WONDER YOU THINK IT IS FLAWED. GOR, I KINDA WONDER WHERE YOU LEARN TO WRITE LIKE THIS GIVEN HOW YOUNG YOU ARE) } negative and positive externalities respectively. { When the cost/price of a good or service, does not reflect these externalities, resources are misallocated, and market failure occurs -- not a complete sentence though}. {To remedy, externalities must be accounted for internalized. this one too, you're trying to translate from VNese into English }
Mệt quá, không sửa được phần dưới nữa. Mong bác tnaduy đọc lại và nghĩ lại về nhận xét của bác với bài viết perfect của em Gor.
Được sửa chữa bởi - longatum vào 16/02/2002 06:10

Vâng bài viết của đồng chí Gor rất là hay, đúng như Long nói là như textbook. Chỉ có hai chỗ nhìn qua thấy sai...thứ nhất, như Long nói là bác tnaduy có vẻ không chuyên về kinh tế nên không để ý, chữ "might" đoạn đầu là đúng...nói chung kinh nghiệm là viết bài econ càng nhiều might càng tốt...heee (nghe chuyện the one-hand economist chưa?)...Chú Long sửa cho cháu Gor chữ internalized thành internalization là chưa đúng...để nguyên mới đúng...
trong bài cũ của Gor ngoài these costs reflects ở đoạn đầu mà bác Tnaduy missed mà Long picked up thì hình như chẳng còn gì sửa về ngữ pháp nữa...đấy là nói vội vàng vì mới xem qua
chúc cả nhà vui
(chú Long có vẻ chăm sóc cháu Gor kỹ nhể...đã đọc thread AI BẢO LÀ GOR ĐÃ CÓ...ở bên Thanglong chưa? )

UẤG