Cùng nhau tạo môi trường nói tiếng Anh ở HN

*Trước tiên xin cảm ơn ý kiến đóng góp của RafaelO
*Xin nhấn mạnh rằng việc tạo môi trường tiếng Anh này nhằm tạo mội trường cho mọi người được nói nhiều hơn -
việc tự học là bắt buộc, và rất hiệu quả như ý kiến của thành viên RafaelO về cách học - còn để thực hành nói cần môi trường thực, đây là ý tưởng cốt yếu
*Thứ nữa là để cho hoạt động hiệu quả thì chúng ta lập nhiều nhóm nhỏ dưới 4 thành viên :
- đảm bảo việc nói của mỗi thành viên được nhiều hơn - việc nghe nói trực tiếp là điều kiện thực hành lý tưởng nhất
- đảm bảo cho vệc các thành viên có cùng điều kiện thời gian, sở thích
*Một điều nữa, để hoạt động được thành công cần sự cố gắng của nhiều người-việc chỉnh sửa dần trong quá trình hoạt động là chắc chắn và chắc chắn sẽ phải chỉnh sửa nhiều cho phù hợp với từng nhóm chứ không có công thức chung -, nhóm nào hoạt động tốt sẽ phát triển làm mẫu cho các nhóm khác
* Mỗi hình thức sinh hoạt học tập có một điểm mạnh điểm yếu riêng và hình thức này nhắn vào việc luyện khả năng nói trực tiếp - Nếu ai đó tham gia không có sự đóng góp, tìm tòi cách thức hoạt động hợp với mình thì chắc chắn sẽ thất bại - thành công hay thất bại là ở chính các bạn.
* Đừng chờ đợi - hãy xem mình có cần - có đúng cái mình cần không và sắn tay vào xem còn gì cần chỉnh sửa thì cùng nhau làm cho nó dần hoàn thiện hơn.*Mình có công đưa ra ý tưởng gốc, thành công là ở việc xây dựng của mọi người
*Tư tưởng cốt yếu trong cách học này xuất phát từ việc học nói tự nhiên của bất cứ ngôn ngữ nào - bạn có thể không biết đọc, ko biết viết nhưng được nghe nói thường xuyên bạn sẽ nghe nói tốt .
*Nhân đây mình cũng nói luôn: sau này sẽ có nhiều thành viên mới lần đầu tiên đọc được topic này, chắc các bạn sẽ phải lập nhóm nhỏ mới hoặc tìm một nhóm nào đó dưới 4 người mà phù hợp để tham gia - các bạn sẽ phải chủ động tìm hiểu trước và có thể liên lạc với các thành viên trước để được giúp đỡ về cách thức hoạt động bên ngoài chứ không đến buổi có mặt và hỏi về nội dung, cách thức hoạt động cơ bản nữa .

tớ cũng rất thíc join vào đây.
Đề nghị các key member cho các thông tin cụ tỉ hơn nữa đi, thấy cứ thíu thíu gì áy nhỉ!
vào đi

Yesterday!
We had thirteen members, included Hằng(hanggtcc10), Yến(vuthanyen1988), Hà(hoang_ha2412), Trang(thuvienmeo), Ý(chipchip8987), Dương( thienduongthuy_038), Giang(maigiang0586),Viet( dotuanviet1981), Tuấn Anh(carol_dethuong_85), Nguyễn Quang Huy(quanghuy4281), Phúc(luuvinhphuc_1986), Tuấn(vuanhtuan_tdn) anh me - Ngọc(ngoc_nguyen_479) .
We discussed and decided :
1. Our club run in three days, Monday, Tuesday and Friday from exact 7h45pm to 9pm at a place around the yard of buiding 34T1 in Trung Hoa Nhan Chinh area.
-Monday, all member contact with key member of day: Mr Phuc
, his phone number is 0915606009+all member have to send a message to key member to confirm the presence of oneself in this day.
+Anyone want to know : how many member will come to the club in this day ? the one can ask key member after come to the club.
-Tuesday, all member contact with key member Mss Ha, her phone number is 0912546709-Friday, all member contact with me, Ngoc, my phone number is 0913302187

2.Each session we have a topic, this topic is outthroughed by all member after one topic is finished. Key member will post this topic and some information around it to this forum, and key member can appoint some members to post more information about this topic .
-Any member who post a comment and other information to this topic should use English from today.
-Each member should prepare some knowledge before come to club, but if anyone isn''t prepared because any case, we still suggest the one come to the club.
3.Each session, we divide to some small groups in which each one have four member or lesser to practise:
So each member have con***ion to hear anh talk more than large group.
So eachday we will have the member permutation.
We always find anh organize again to have groups better in the practise.

4.In the new head way, we homogenize that we will have the difficult, new difficult, so we have change and amend more for the activity of club is better.
All member of club contribute energies together to build this English environment for usefullness of all.
Thanks a lot for animation of all!.

The first topic: How to improve your English skills
Learning is a skill and it can be improved.
Your path to learning effectively is through knowing
yourself your capacity to learn processes you have successfully used in the past your interest, and knowledge of what you wish to learn Motivate yourself
If you are not motivated to learn English you will become frustrated and give up. Ask yourself the following questions, and be honest:-
Why do you need to learn/improve English? Where will you need to use English? What skills do you need to learn/improve? How soon do you need to see results? How much time can you afford to devote to learning English. Do you have a plan or learning stratery?Set yourself achievable goals
You know how much time you can dedicate to learning English, but a short time each day will produce better, longer-term results than a full day on the weekend and then nothing for two weeks.
Joining a short intensive course could produce better results than joining a course that takes place once a week for six months.
Here are some goals you could set yourself:-
Join an English course (and attend regularly). Do your homework. Read a book a month. Learn a new word every day. Visit an English speaking forum every day. Read a news article on the net every day. Do 10 minutes listening practice every day. Watch an English film at least once a month. Make an English/ESL friend Follow a soap, comedy or radio or TV drama
Quote by a member!

Em học ở gần đó và lại học buổi chiều nên rất tiện cho việc tham gia.Em rất muốn tham gia nhưng bị cái thời gian hoạt động của các bác lại từ 7h30pm-9h30pm thì muộn quá!các bác có thể bắt đầu từ 6h chiều được ko?

iem cũng giống bạn nì

Cả hai làm một nhóm vào giờ đó đi, ok

Em cũng muốn tham gia. Nhưng tự mình lập 1 nhóm thì ..... khó quá. Cho em vào nhóm nào đấy được ko nhỉ. Nick em : friendlyboy12345@yahoo.com

Topic to day is " planning life"
At this time I don''t have enought time to write, so I search and paste.
Quote
By MATT BAI
Published: November 4, 2007
Like other businesses, politics these days is conducted less in person than on speaker phone and laptops. Campaign consultants, policy analysts, fund-raisers and bloggers do most of their work in the comfort of their own homes, or in their cars, or maybe at Starbucks. Political professionals have as a result become part of a much larger American movement. In his new book, ?oMicrotrends,? the Democratic pollster Mark Penn notes that 4.2 million Americans now work exclusively from home (a nearly 100 percent increase from 1990), while some 20 million do it part time. Some of these workers are employees who telecommute to tra***ional offices, but most represent a kind of modern, untethered American work force.
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image

The federal government says nearly a third of workers qualify as ?oindependent,? a category that includes self-employed professionals, contractors and part-time and temporary workers. For some reason, however, when it comes to making policy, political leaders seem to regard workplace independence as a privilege that should accrue only to affluent workers. Republicans, following the lead of George W. Bush and his ?oownership society,? propose new savings and health-care plans that might help self-employed workers substitute for the benefits given by tra***ional employers, but only if they can put something extra away each month. Democrats meanwhile are prone to castigate employers who would outsource jobs to self-employed contractors, regarding the transition toward an independent work force as the mugging of the little guy. There is an accurate diagnosis in this view; certainly, a lot of employers are trying to shirk their responsibilities when they designate computer programmers or midlevel marketers as contingent workers. But the prescription ?" that the only solution is to somehow shame companies into honoring a decades-old social contract ?" ignores a historic opportunity to create a more enlightened notion of work.
After all, why shouldn?Tt more middle-class workers whose jobs can now be done remotely have the option to structure their own hours and still enjoy the security of a safety net? Why shouldn?Tt data-entry clerks and graphic designers and actuaries and reservations agents ?" anyone who spends his days staring at a terminal in some sterile environment straight out of ?oOffice Spacê? ?" be able to work in shorts and spend more time around the kids? According to Penn, stay-at-home workers actually log more hours than their counterparts in offices but report far higher rates of job satisfaction. The age of broadband means we might reasonably imagine a day when the American workplace of ?oface timê? and endless polluting commutes fades slowly into the past, replaced by a society where vastly more workers get control over their daily lives.
As it stands now, it?Ts hard for eminently replaceable workers to negotiate this kind of freedom. But if workers?T benefits weren?Tt tied to employers, then they could transition into independent status without fear of losing their health care or pensions, and more employers would gladly oblige, since they could move costly benefits packages off their books. And yet the old, employer-based canon of policies makes it impossible for most workers with a modest income to even consider becoming their own bosses. Self-employed workers pay more than 15 percent of their incomes to Social Security, while tra***ional workers pay half that rate. (Some economists like to say this is a meaningless distinction, since employers are in theory taking their share of Social Security payments out of their employees?T wages, but in practice few employers or employees see it that way.) Life and disability insurance remain prohibitively expensive for independent workers with modest incomes, and unemployment insurance and flexible spending accounts for child care are available only through employers.
In other words, a system devised before the word ?otelecommutê? ever existed helps to keep ordinary workers chained to their modular cubicles, while richer workers get to take advantage of a new, potentially liberating lifestyle. There are some significant agents for change; the New York Freelancers Union (now the fourth-largest in the state) offers benefits in some states and lobbies for independent workers, and the Service Employees International Union will soon help to inaugurate a new program offering financial planning tools and health insurance plans to younger workers who employ themselves or who are caught between full-time jobs. There are also some innovative ideas floating around. Writing in ?oDemocracy: A Journal of Ideas? in 2005, Karen Kornbluh, Barack Obamâ?Ts policy chief in the Senate, proposed replacing the employer-based benefits system with portable ?ofamily insurancê? instead; this policy might include a flexible tax cre*** that could be used to offset health care, child care and other family-related expenses ?" a potentially transformative idea that would benefit families who don?Tt earn six figures. Obama himself has talked of the need to update the 20th-century social contract, though as a candidate he has offered few concrete proposals for doing so. This may be because, for Democrats in the Bush era, accepting changes in the workplace is considered tantamount to siding with Bushian corporatists.
In fact, the current presidential candidates have moved only gingerly toward redefining the relationship between business, workers and government. Any of the leading Democratic candidates?T health-care plans might constitute a critical step in that direction, since they would allow ?" or even force ?" independent workers to buy insurance from pooled plans or the government. No candidate, however, has yet envisioned a package of proposals that might make the self-employed society a reality for everyone. That means a political opening still exists. The last party to forge a social contract befitting a new technological era ?" the New Deal-era Democrats ?" ended up dominating American politics for more than half a century. The next 50 years are thus far unclaimed.
Matt Bai, who covers politics for the magazine, is the author of ?oThe Argument: Billionaires, Bloggers and the Battle to Remake Democratic Politics.?
Next Article in Magazine (8 of 17) »
Được nguyen_ngoc_bkhn sửa chữa / chuyển vào 16:30 ngày 09/11/2007

Ồ topic trôi đi tận mấy trang cuối.
Hình như topic lần tới là traffic jam??? or changing living place?