English test! help me pleaz!!!

Theo mình nghĩ, có nhiều trường hợp, tiếng Việt cần phải nhiều từ hơn tiếng Anh thì mới đủ nghĩa, song cũng có những trường hợp tiếng Anh phải dùng nhiều từ hơn tiếng Việt mới diễn tả nổi ỹ nghĩa của câu trong tiếng Việt. Câu này là một trong những ví dụ:
Tiếng Việt có thể nói là:
"Có giả thuyết cho rằng các trò chơi là một trong những công cụ huấn luyện cho cá nhân trưởng thành trong cuộc sống sau này"
Tiếng Anh có thể phải là:
One theory suggests that children??Ts play and games were not only straightforward fun, but a means of integrating the individual within the social group, and of preparation for adulthood.

Được TDHung sửa chữa / chuyển vào 01:09 ngày 19/07/2002

Được TDHung sửa chữa / chuyển vào 01:09 ngày 19/07/2002

"won good" doesn't make sense, but you could say:
"did well", "done good (slang)"
The sentence should be:
She's so beautiful that she (did well) / (won) / (done good in) a number of beauty contests in which she entered. This is what she had always wanted.

"won good" doesn't make sense, but you could say:
"did well", "done good (slang)"
The sentence should be:
She's so beautiful that she (did well) / (won) / (done good in) a number of beauty contests in which she entered. This is what she had always wanted.

I don't think the original sentence is wrong. I have asked my experienced teacher of English , a native english speaker, about this sentence.
According to his answer, the original sentence is gramatically OK.
The verb " to win" is a transitive verb with a direct object, "good".
Futhermore, Your changing the sentence makes it become a bit redundant and ambiguous to understand.
Regards,
Rudky

I don't think the original sentence is wrong. I have asked my experienced teacher of English , a native english speaker, about this sentence.
According to his answer, the original sentence is gramatically OK.
The verb " to win" is a transitive verb with a direct object, "good".
Futhermore, Your changing the sentence makes it become a bit redundant and ambiguous to understand.
Regards,
Rudky

All of them are grammatically correct. But they sound very strange and somewhat funny.
The target of your teacher's providing these problems is want you students to practice changing the ative voice to the passive voice.
Only rarely do we find such types of sentences in nornal life.
Regards
Rudky

All of them are grammatically correct. But they sound very strange and somewhat funny.
The target of your teacher's providing these problems is want you students to practice changing the ative voice to the passive voice.
Only rarely do we find such types of sentences in nornal life.
Regards
Rudky

Grammatically, adverb follow verb is acceptable, making sense or not (to everyday English speaking persons) is another matter.
I would love to protect my teacher's integrity whenever possible but when things go wrong you can't help but question. In Vietnam this is an uncommon occurence, as it is embedded in the culture that "Không thày đố mày làm nên", "Tiên học lễ, hậu học văn", "Trứng đòi khôn hơn vịt" etc .. basically anything *****ppress your suspicions. Here in England however, we are free to challenge or query without fear of embarrasment or retribution, whether it be lord, lady, king or just the dog next door.
You use two big words in your comment "redundant" and "ambiguous". Would you elaborate on your choice of words ?
Được chuot_con sửa chữa / chuyển vào 04:51 ngày 20/07/2002