Giới thiệu về Su-27SKM và Su-30MK2 (Phần 3)

ga tạm ngừng các chuyến bay Su-27
VIT - Thông báo của Bộ Quốc phòng Nga cho biết, Nga tạm ngừng các chuyến bay của máy bay chiến đấu Su-27 trước khi tìm ra nguyên nhân xảy ra sự cố tại vùng Viễn Đông hôm 14/1 đối với máy bay này.
?oTrước khi làm rõ nguyên nhân Su-27 mất tích tại Viễn Đông, các chuyến bay của máy bay này tạm thời bị ngừng lại?, phát ngôn viên Bộ Quốc phòng Nga cho hay.
Su-27 Flanker đã biến mất khỏi màn hình radar trong khi đang thực hiện chuyến bay theo kết hoạch tại vùng Viễn Đông. Theo lịch trình bày, Su-27 cất cánh từ sân bay Dzyangni tại Komsomolsk-on-Amur. Máy bay đã mất tích lúc 09h27?T (giờ Moscow).
Theo lời đại diện Bộ Quốc phòng, uỷ ban của Bộ đã có mặt tại hiện trường và điều tra nguyên nhân gây sự cố.
Theo cơ quan trên, họ đã tìm thấy thi thể phi công và những mảnh vỡ của thân máy bay tại địa điểm Su-27 rơi.
Những ?ohộp đen? của máy bay cũng đã được tìm thấy và đã được gửi về để kiểm tra.
Máy bay Su-27 là loại máy bay siêu tiêm kích, được Lực lượng Không quân Nga sử dụng từ năm 1984. Kể từ khi đưa vào sử dụng, một số vụ tai nạn liên quan tới dòng máy bay này đã xảy ra.

Năm 2009, ít nhất 2 vụ tai nạn chết người đã xảy ra đối với máy bay Su-27. Ngày 30/8/2009, một chiếc Su-27 của Nga bị rơi khi đang tham gia bay biểu diễn tại Ba lan, khiến cho 2 phi công bị thiệt mạng.

Trong cuộc Triển làm Hàng không MAKS 2009, hai chiếc Su-27 đã đâm vào nhau trên không trung. Vụ tai nạn đã khiến cho chỉ huy đội bay biểu diễn Knights của Nga, Đại tá Igor Tkachenko, bị thiệt mạng và 2 phi công khác bị thương.
Huy Linh (Theo

Trên các mạng nước ngoài đã có thông báo từ lâu là máy bay tàng hình thế hệ 5 của Nga sẽ bay vào 29/1/2010 nhưng ngày hôm nay mới có thông báo là máy bay T-50 hay PAK FA hay Russian Firefox lý ra đã bay vào ngày hôm nay 28 nhưng hoãn ra ngày mai 29.Cũng gần đây anh TQ cũng đăng thông tin về máy bay phóng tên lửa mới của Nga là PAK DA.Người Nga vẫn giữ nguyên lộ trình và lời hứa với các đồng minh và thế giới khoa học , mặc dù có nguồn tin là F-35 được đưa ra chỉ vào 2020 thay cho 2016 như ngày xưa,Mai các bạn có thông tin gì thì góp vui.
Russian 5th-generation fighter to make maiden flight on Friday
28/01/201013:13
Russia is set to hold the first test of its futuristic fifth-generation fighter jet on Friday, a source at the country''s largest aircraft producer said on Thursday.
"The [test] flight was initially scheduled for Thursday, but has been postponed," the source at the Gagarin KNAAPO company, a subsidiary of aircraft holding Sukhoi, said.
Russia''s only known fifth-generation project is Sukhoi''s PAK FA and the current prototype is the T-50. It is designed to compete with the U.S. F-22 Raptor, so far the world''s only fifth-generation fighter, and the F-35 Lightning II, but has yet to take to the skies.
Speaking at a news conference later on Thursday, the chief of the Russian state-controlled arms exporter Rosoboronexport said India remained Russia''s sole partner in the project.
"We [Russia and India] are working to build the fifth-generation aircraft," Anatoly Isaikin said.
Russia has been developing its newest fighter since the 1990s. The country''s top military officials earlier said the stealth fighter jet with a range of up to 5,500 km would enter service with the Air Force in 2015.
India, which has a long history of defense relations with Russia, joined the project after signing an agreement in October 2007. But the two nations are still in talks to finalize the contract.
India''s Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) was reported to be seeking a 25% share in design and development in the project. It has also sought to modify Sukhoi''s single-seat prototype into the twin-seat fighter India''s Air Force wants.
Russia accounts for around 70% of India''s weapons inventory. HAL has license-produced Sukhoi Su-30MKI fighters, cooperated in the development of the Brahmos supersonic cruise missile, and plans to work on a joint multirole transport aircraft.
Defense ties have strained, however, over the fifth-generation fighter program and the rising cost of refurbishing the Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov for the Indian navy.
The PAK FA is to be armed with next-generation air-to-air, air-to-surface, and air-to-ship missiles, and has two 30-mm cannons.
The first prototype of the jet was already tested on the runway of the aircraft plant in Komsomolsk-on-Amur in Russia''s Far East. The test pilot made two runs on the airstrip, during which the brakes were applied several times.
MOSCOW, January 28 (RIA Novosti)
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20100128/157703215.html

Vài thông tin thêm về PAK FA
India to develop 25% of fifth generation fighter
Ajai Shukla / New Delhi January 6, 2010, 0:36 IST
Scrutinising the Sukhoi Corporation?Ts work on the Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) ?" a project that India will soon sign up to co-develop ?" gives one an idea of Russia?Ts size, and its aerospace expertise. During daytime, in Moscow, the Sukhoi Design Bureau conceptualises FGFA components; by 10 pm the drawings are electronically transmitted over 5,000 kilometres to a manufacturing unit in Siberia. Here, at KnAAPO (Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Production Organisation) ?" seven time zones away ?" it is already 5 am next morning. Within a couple of hours, the drawings start being translated into aircraft production.
Having designed over 100 aircraft (including India?Ts Su-30MKI), built over 10,000 fighters, and with 50 world aviation records to its cre***, Sukhoi understandably regards Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) ?" its partner-to-be in designing the FGFA ?" as very much the greenhorn.
But the newcomer wants its due. Bangalore-based HAL has negotiated firmly to get a 25 per cent share of design and development work in the FGFA programme. HAL?Ts work share will include critical software, including the mission computer (the Su-30MKI mission computer is entirely Indian); navigation systems; most of the ****pit displays; the counter measure dispensing (CMD) systems; and modifying Sukhoi?Ts single-seat prototype into the twin-seat fighter that the Indian Air Force (IAF) wants.

THE FIFTH GENERATION FIGHTER
Cost of development $8-10 billion
India''s requirement 250 fighters
Russia''s requirement 250 fighters
Cost per aircraft $100 million
Indian name FGFA
Russian name PAK FA
India will also contribute its expertise in aircraft composites, developed while designing the Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA). Russia has tra***ionally built metallic aircraft; just 10 per cent of the Su-30MKI fuselage is titanium and composites. The FGFA?Ts fuselage, in contrast, will be 25 per cent titanium and 20 per cent composites. Russia?Ts expertise in titanium structures will be complemented by India?Ts experience in composites.
With India?Ts work share almost finalised, the 2007 Russia-India Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) to build the FGFA will soon evolve into a commercial contract between Russia?Ts United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) and HAL. Ashok Baweja, until recently the chairman of HAL, told Business Standard: ?oWhen HAL and UAC agree on terms, they will sign a General Contract. This will include setting up a JV to design the FGFA, and precise details about who will fund what.?
This contract will mark a significant shift in the aeronautical relationship between India and Russia. For decades, HAL has played a technologically subordinate role, assembling and building fighters that Russia had designed. Now, forced to accept HAL as a design partner, the Russians have negotiated hard to limit its role.
The reason: Russia is sceptical about India?Ts design ability in such a cutting edge project. In June 2008, Business Standard interviewed Vyacheslav Trubnikov, then Russia?Ts ambassador to India, and an expert on Russia?Ts defence industry. Contrasting the Su-30MKI with the Tejas LCA, Trubnikov pointed out snidely, ?oI know perfectly well the Russian ability. But I don?Tt know what contribution the Indian side might make. So, one must ask the question to the Indian designers, to HAL?what is their claim for building a fighter of the fifth generation type? Either avionics, or engine? What might be India?Ts contribution? To be absolutely frank, I don?Tt know.?
For long, the UAC argued that HAL could not expect a major role in the FGFA because Sukhoi had finished much of the work while New Delhi ***hered about joining the project. UAC asserts that 5,000 Sukhoi engineers have worked for five years to design the FGFA. Such claims are hard to verify, but it is known that the Sukhoi Design Bureau has about 8,000 engineers, distributed between many different programmes.
With Sukhoi?Ts ploughing on alone, Minister of State for Defence Pallam Raju admitted to Business Standard: ?oThe longer India waits to join the project, the lesser will be our contribution. But, we are not sitting idle. Through the defence ministry?Ts existing programmes [such as the Tejas LCA] we are building up our capabilities.?
Most Indian officials agree that India has not lost much. Even if the FGFA makes its much-anticipated first flight this year, it is still at a preliminary stage of development. Ashok Baweja assessed in early 2009, ?oThe FGFA?Ts first flight is just the beginning of the programme. My understanding is that the Russians are going ahead (with the test) to validate the FGFA?Ts ?oproof of concept? (conceptual design). Whatever composite materials they have now, they?Tll use. But, because the composites will change? the FGFA will keep evolving for a fairly long time.?
A top ministry official estimates, ?oIt will take another 4-5 years to develop many of the FGFA?Ts systems. Then, the aircraft will undergo at least 2000 hours of certification flying and, possibly, some reconfiguration. The FGFA should not be expected in service before 2017. And the twin-seat version may take a couple of years longer.?
With just a 25 per cent share of design, South Block policymakers still believe that the FGFA project is a vital step towards India?Ts emergence as a military aeronautical power. ?oDeveloping 25 per cent of this fighter is far better than just transferring technology to build it in India, as we did with the Su-30MKI,? points out a defence ministry official.
Ashok Baweja puts the project in context. ?oIndia can only (develop the FGFA) by partnering with Russia. They have so much experience. It?Ts not just the design? you must also have materials? maraging steel, titanium, composite alloys, and the industrial base to convert these into high-tech components like gyros, sensors and optics. The FGFA will give us important experience for building fighters hereafter.?
India to develop 25% of fifth generation fighter
Ajai Shukla/New Delhi - Jan 06,2010 00:36 AM

Scrutinising the Sukhoi Corporation''s work on the Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) — a project that India will soon sign up to co-develop — gives one an idea of Russia''s size, and its aerospace expertise. During daytime, in Moscow, the Sukhoi Design Bureau conceptualises FGFA components; by 10 pm the drawings are electronically transmitted over 5,000 kilometres to a manufacturing unit in Siberia. Here, at KnAAPO (Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Production Organisation) — seven time zones away — it is already 5 am next morning. Within a couple of hours, the drawings start being translated into aircraft production.
Having designed over 100 aircraft (including India''s Su-30MKI), built over 10,000 fighters, and with 50 world aviation records to its cre***, Sukhoi understandably regards Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) — its partner-to-be in designing the FGFA — as very much the greenhorn.
But the newcomer wants its due. Bangalore-based HAL has negotiated firmly to get a 25 per cent share of design and development work in the FGFA programme. HAL''s work share will include critical software, including the mission computer (the Su-30MKI mission computer is entirely Indian); navigation systems; most of the ****pit displays; the counter measure dispensing (CMD) systems; and modifying Sukhoi''s single-seat prototype into the twin-seat fighter that the Indian Air Force (IAF) wants.
THE FIFTH GENERATION FIGHTER
Cost of development
$8-10 billion
India''s requirement
250 fighters
Russia''s requirement
250 fighters
Cost per aircraft
$100 million
Indian name
FGFA
Russian name
PAK FA
India will also contribute its expertise in aircraft composites, developed while designing the Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA). Russia has tra***ionally built metallic aircraft; just 10 per cent of the Su-30MKI fuselage is titanium and composites. The FGFA''s fuselage, in contrast, will be 25 per cent titanium and 20 per cent composites. Russia''s expertise in titanium structures will be complemented by India''s experience in composites.
With India''s work share almost finalised, the 2007 Russia-India Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) to build the FGFA will soon evolve into a commercial contract between Russia''s United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) and HAL. Ashok Baweja, until recently the chairman of HAL, told Business Standard: "When HAL and UAC agree on terms, they will sign a General Contract. This will include setting up a JV to design the FGFA, and precise details about who will fund what.&"
This contract will mark a significant shift in the aeronautical relationship between India and Russia. For decades, HAL has played a technologically subordinate role, assembling and building fighters that Russia had designed. Now, forced to accept HAL as a design partner, the Russians have negotiated hard to limit its role.
The reason: Russia is sceptical about India''s design ability in such a cutting edge project. In June 2008, Business Standard interviewed Vyacheslav Trubnikov, then Russia''s ambassador to India, and an expert on Russia''s defence industry. Contrasting the Su-30MKI with the Tejas LCA, Trubnikov pointed out snidely, "I know perfectly well the Russian ability. But I don''t know what contribution the Indian side might make. So, one must ask the question to the Indian designers, to HAL…what is their claim for building a fighter of the fifth generation type? Either avionics, or engine? What might be India''s contribution? To be absolutely frank, I don''t know.&"
For long, the UAC argued that HAL could not expect a major role in the FGFA because Sukhoi had finished much of the work while New Delhi ***hered about joining the project. UAC asserts that 5,000 Sukhoi engineers have worked for five years to design the FGFA. Such claims are hard to verify, but it is known that the Sukhoi Design Bureau has about 8,000 engineers, distributed between many different programmes.
With Sukhoi''s ploughing on alone, Minister of State for Defence Pallam Raju admitted to Business Standard: "The longer India waits to join the project, the lesser will be our contribution. But, we are not sitting idle. Through the defence ministry''s existing programmes [such as the Tejas LCA] we are building up our capabilities.&"
Most Indian officials agree that India has not lost much. Even if the FGFA makes its much-anticipated first flight this year, it is still at a preliminary stage of development. Ashok Baweja assessed in early 2009, "The FGFA''s first flight is just the beginning of the programme. My understanding is that the Russians are going ahead (with the test) to validate the FGFA''s "proof of concept&" (conceptual design). Whatever composite materials they have now, they''ll use. But, because the composites will change… the FGFA will keep evolving for a fairly long time.&"
A top ministry official estimates, "It will take another 4-5 years to develop many of the FGFA''s systems. Then, the aircraft will undergo at least 2000 hours of certification flying and, possibly, some reconfiguration. The FGFA should not be expected in service before 2017. And the twin-seat version may take a couple of years longer.&"
With just a 25 per cent share of design, South Block policymakers still believe that the FGFA project is a vital step towards India''s emergence as a military aeronautical power. "Developing 25 per cent of this fighter is far better than just transferring technology to build it in India, as we did with the Su-30MKI,&" points out a defence ministry official.
Ashok Baweja puts the project in context. "India can only (develop the FGFA) by partnering with Russia. They have so much experience. It''s not just the design… you must also have materials… maraging steel, titanium, composite alloys, and the industrial base to convert these into high-tech components like gyros, sensors and optics. The FGFA will give us important experience for building fighters hereafter.&"
India, Russia close to PACT on next generation fighter
Tuesday, 05 January 2010 08:34 Shag User Rating: / 0
PoorBest
[Ajai Shukla/Business Standard] Late last year, a defence ministry delegation *****khoi?Ts flagship aircraft facility in Siberia became the first Indians to set eyes upon the next-generation fighter that is slated to form the backbone of the future Indian Air Force (IAF).
In that first meeting, carefully choreographed by Sukhoi, the new fighter, standing on the tarmac waved a welcome to the Indians, moving all its control fins simultaneously.
The effect, recounts one member of that delegation, was electric. The senior IAF officer there walked silently up to the aircraft and touched it almost incredulously. This was the Sukhoi T-50, the first technology demonstrator of what India terms the Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA). Senior defence ministry sources tell Business Standard that ?" after five years of haggling over the FGFA?Ts form, capabilities and work-share ?" a detailed contract on joint development is just around the corner.
The contract, which Bangalore-based Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) will sign with Russia?Ts United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), will commit to building 250 fighters for the IAF and an equal number for Russia. The option for further orders will be kept open. HAL and UAC will be equal partners in a joint venture company, much like the Brahmos JV, that will develop and manufacture the FGFA.
The cost of developing the FGFA, which would be shared between both countries, will be $8-10 billion (Rs 37,000-45,000 crore). Over and above that, say IAF and defence ministry sources, each FGFA will cost Rs 400-500 crore.
Sukhoi?Ts FGFA prototype, which is expected to make its first flight within weeks, is a true stealth aircraft, almost invisible to enemy radar. According to a defence ministry official, ?oIt is an amazing looking aircraft. It has a Radar Cross Section (RCS) of just 0.5 square metre as compared to the Su-30MKI?Ts RCS of about 20 square metres.?
[That means that while a Su-30MKI would be as visible to enemy radar as a metal object 5 metres X 4 metres in dimension, the FGFA?Ts radar signature would be just 1/40th of that.]
A key strength of the 30-35 tonne FGFA would be data fusion; the myriad inputs from the fighter?Ts infrared, radar, and visual sensors would be electronically combined and fed to the pilots in easy-to-read form.
The FGFA partnership was conceived a decade ago, in 2000, when Sukhoi?Ts celebrated chief, Mikhail Pogosyan, invited a visiting Indian Air Force officer out to dinner in Moscow. Boris Yeltsin?Ts disastrous presidency had just ended, and Russia?Ts near bankruptcy was reflected in the run-down con***ion of a once-famous restaurant. But, as the IAF officer recounts, the vodka was flowing and Pogosyan was in his element, a string of jokes translated by a female interpreter.
Late that evening Pogosyan turned serious, switching the conversation to a secret project that, officially, did not even exist. Sukhoi, he confided to the IAF officer, had completed the design of a fifth generation fighter, as advanced as America?Ts F-22 Raptor, which is still the world?Ts foremost fighter. Russia?Ts economy was in tatters, but Sukhoi would develop its new, high-tech fighter if India partnered Russia, sharing the costs of developing the fighter at Sukhoi?Ts plant, Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Production Organisation (KnAAPO).
Reaching out to India was logical for Russia. During the 1990s ?" when thousands of Russian military design bureaus starved for funds, and a bankrupt Moscow cancelled 1,149 R&D projects ?" India?Ts defence purchases had kept Russia?Ts defence industry alive, bankrolling the development of the Sukhoi-30 fighter; the Talwar-class stealth frigates; the Uran and Klub ship-borne missiles; and the MiG-21 upgrade.
But co-developing a fifth generation fighter is a different ball game, financially and technologically, and India?Ts MoD hesitated to sign up. Meanwhile enriched by hydrocarbon revenues, Moscow gave Sukhoi the green light to develop the FGFA, which Russia terms the PAK-FA, the acronym for Perspektivnyi Aviatsionnyi Kompleks Frontovoi Aviatsy (literally Prospective Aircraft Complex of Frontline Aviation).
Today, Russia is five years into the development of the FGFA. In November 2007, India and Russia signed an Inter-Governmental Agreement on co-developing the fighter, but it has taken two more years to agree upon common specifications, work shares in development, and in resolving issues like Intellectual Property Rights (IPR).
The prototype that Sukhoi has built is tailored to Russian Air Force requirements. But the IAF has different specifications and the JV will cater for both air forces, producing two different, but closely related, aircraft. For example, Russia wants a single-seat fighter; the IAF, happy with the Su-30MKI, insists upon a twin-seat fighter with one pilot flying and the other handling the sensors, networks and weaponry.
Negotiations have resolved even this fundamental conflict. India has agreed to buy a mix of about 50 single-seat and 200 twin-seat aircraft. Russia, in turn, will consider buying more twin-seat aircraft to use as trainers. But even as both countries narrow their differences, fresh challenges lie ahead: preparing India?Ts nascent aerospace industry for the high-tech job of developing and manufacturing a fifth-generation fighter.

Nhìn mấy con J nhà khựa giống hệt mấy con này của ngố cả con Mig1.44 nữa giống y đúc. Ăn cắp tài tình kinh khủng

http://lenta.ru/news/2010/01/29/fighter/
PAK-FA đã bay thử thành công lần đầu tiên. Chưa có ảnh

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mp0yd6no7B4&feature=player_embedded
thêm cái link nhưng hình như đây là video high-speed taxi trial chứ ko phải 1st flight
Được napster90 sửa chữa / chuyển vào 13:23 ngày 29/01/2010
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d68/zmey********/pak-fa.jpg
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d68/zmey********/pak-fa2.jpg
trông ngon lành cành đào phết cái ảnh render trên tạp chí popular mechanic chỉ lệch mỗi cái đuôi ở giữa
Được napster90 sửa chữa / chuyển vào 13:32 ngày 29/01/2010

Russia miracle fighter attack any target remains unnoticed
Fifth-generation fighter, its con***ional Design A T-50, must make its first flight today. The tests will take place in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. It is there that is the main production area of "dry". The new fighter will be able to perform combat missions at any time and in any weather. Other important qualities - maneuverability and invisibility to enemy radar. More about him radio Vesti FM "said e***or in chief of the agency AviaPort Oleg Panteleyev.
- Oleg Konstantinovich, hello.
- Hello.
- How is the new aircraft and whether to call it a fighter?
- In general, the exact name - it is a promising aviation complex Frontal Aviation. It is envisaged that the new machine will be equally address both air superiority and strike ground targets, as well as sea.
- There are a lot of electronics, which allows strikes on several targets both on land and in the air.
- To be fair the main difference between fifth-generation fighter from previous generations of machines will be even in the specifications, such as speed, range and maneuverability characteristics, but the fact that this machine will be able to see farther, sooner detect targets both land and air. In some cases, the car did not even need to identify themselves. Includes radar, it will be able to take information from its environment from other media, such as airborne early warning aircraft and the other fighters, operating nearby. And this machine will be able to use the widest range of weapons in the first place - high precision, which would make it very effective for the destruction and ground targets.
- But while the plane itself can be virtually invisible to the enemy, because they use technologies that reduce the level of radiation that is emitted by the aircraft, its surface, and accordingly, the worse it is noticeable to the enemy''s radar, right?
- Exactly. On the one hand, on the whole range, ie in the optical, infrared or visible in the radar signature, the aircraft will be less noticeable. On the other hand, due to interoperability with other aircraft and ground stations it can receive information, not including radars and other sources of radiation, which would make him invisible.
- We are talking about a similar technology, as applied by the Americans, when building their planes invisible?
- Basic approaches, of course, are the same. They are to reduce the so-called parameter - the effective area of dispersion, in fact, to radar, the aircraft will be less noticeable. In the infrared, it is that the engines are heated to very high temperatures, but due to the fact that they are shielded from the outside are closed, they will be less noticeable. Also, coming from the engine hot flow will be somewhat cool. And all these technologies combine to make the aircraft less visible. Another thing is that the specific design solutions, as it will be implemented by Russian designers - is somewhat different from what is suggested and are already implementing the Americans.
- When we talk about modern cars, the abundance of electronics in them leads to the fact that they are still quite often break down: when there are many sites, more likely, that some of them should fail. In aircraft the same? Still, they are not in order, and several orders of magnitude more expensive.
- In aviation, uses a very large number of different electronic devices and systems, but all vital systems are duplicated many times, so if the main circuit is broken, you can always switch to the backup channel and continue the combat mission without any complications.

Đua lại Video của các bạn.Trông thon và dài chắc để các vũ khí tầm xa.

Bụng vừa to vừa dài hi vọng để được tầm 8-10 quả R-77 là ngon hơn F-22 rồi

Khó nhìn chút nhưng có vẻ giống với cái ảnh T-50 xanh xanh trên kia
Con này chắc dự tính trang bị cho tàu sân bay của Nga.

http://sukhoi.org/news/company/?id=3142
Thông cáo báo chí của sukhoi về sự kiện, bác nào rành tiếng Nga thì dịch ra tiếng Việt những ý chính một chút cho mọi người
Thêm ảnh:



dường như có 2 weapon bay đặt dọc ở giữa máy bay
Được napster90 sửa chữa / chuyển vào 14:14 ngày 29/01/2010