Giới thiệu về Su-27SKM và Su-30MK2

Cái hình ở giữa hình như là con X35D của hãng RollRoy phát triển. Đây là laọi phản lực lên thẳng, tàng hình, hiện đại Mỹ được trang bị cho hải quân . Cái này được phát trên chương trình Technology Today , Chính phủ Mỹ dự định đặt hàng trên 3000 cái

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Có lẽ việc Úc mua F-35 chắc còn nhiều ý kiến vì Úc có quann tâm đến cân bằng lực lượng vói Su-30 ở ASEAN có lẽ Úc có Đông Ti mo.Nhưng Malaysia mua Su-30MKM cũng có ý định sẽ sử dụng các vũ khí tầm xa mới như tên lửa chống hạm Brahmos.
Malaysian ?~Flankers?T Could Redraw
Balance of Pacific Airpower
4 ',о?ник | 19 авгfс,а 2003
The jets are valued at around $900 million. The acquisition of such
advanced combat aircraft will significantly alter the balance of airpower
in the Pacific. China is already acquiring a much larger force
of multi-role Su-30MKKs to augment its Su-27SK (J-11) air superiority
fighters.
However, Malaysia?Ts Su-30MKMs may well be superior to the
Chinese variant thanks to a more mature and advanced suite of avionics.
Sukhoi?Ts experience with the Indian Su-30MKI programme
should also flow into Malaysia?Ts Su-30MKM variant. The new
?~Flankers?T will be built by the Irkut Corp (formerly IAPO, the Irkutsk
Aviation Production Association) ?" the same organisation that supplied
the Su-30MKI.
Press reports state that the Malaysian Su-30MKMs two-seat
combat aircraft will be equipped with the latest generation N011M
Bars passive electronically-scanned phased-array radar. They will
be armed with the R-77 (AA-12 ?~Adder?T) active-radar beyond visual
range air-to-air missile, and strike weapons including the Kh-
31A (AS-17 ?~Krypton?T) and Kh-35 (AS-20 ?~Kayak?T) air-to-surface
missiles. Malaysia is understood to be seeking a maritime attack
role for its Su-30MKMs and may be a candidate to acquire the
BrahMos ramjet anti-ship missile (now being developed as a joint
venture between India and Russia, as a derivative of the 3M-55
Onyx system).
With such sophisticated weapons and systems the Su-30MKMs
will be arguably the most potent combat aircraft in any Pacific air
force, and their arrival will cause concern in nearby nations ?" in
particular Indonesia, Singapore and Australia.
Robert Hewson

Tinhf hình F-35 giưa Anh , Úc và Mỹ
Last Update: Wednesday, March 15, 2006. 3:15pm (AEDT)
Australia is seeking reassurance over F-35 technology sharing.

Defence officials air concerns over US fighter jet deal
Senior Australian Defence Force (ADF) officials have cast doubt on whether Australia will continue with the nation''s biggest defence purchase, the US Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program.
The sticking point is the United States has not yet agreed to share sensitive technology for the aircraft.
Testifying at a US Senate Committee in Washington today, the Australian officials made their concerns plain and threatened not to proceed to the next phase of the project unless they are assured they will have access to all technology needed to operate and service the jets.
The Federal Opposition is warning of a gap in Australia''s air defence if the strike purchase does not proceed.
At a cost of $12 billion, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighters (JSF) will be Australia''s most expensive defence purchase, set to be delivered in 2012.
Rear Admiral Gates is the head of Australia''s defence staff in Washington and he has testified today before the US Senate Armed Services Committee.
It is examining the JSF project, which involves America and eight other nations.
"Schedule is critical because we need to replace our ageing F-111 and F/A-18 aircraft," he said.
Sticking points
Rear Admiral Gates has made it clear there are some sticking points.
"Guaranteed access to necessary JSF data and technology to allow Australia to operate and support the JSF will be required before we join the next phase of the project," he said.
Australia is due to sign up for the next phase of the project by December this year.
Rear Admiral Gates has told ABC radio''s The World Today program that US laws have to be changed to allow America to share sensitive technology that Australia needs to operate and service the jets.
"Legislative change is a difficult road - I thought our political system in Australia was challenging enough, here''s it''s quite fascinating," he said.
"[But] I don''t think it is impossible."
The federal Opposition has been warning of a looming gap in Australia''s air defence between the planned retirement of the F-111s and the delivery of the Joint Strike Fighters.
Rear Admiral Gates says Australia is pushing the US to deliver the new jets on budget and on time.
"I think it''s critical to us in that respect. You heard us stress that both the F-111 and the F/A-18 that their departures and what we''re trying to work here is that there won''t be any potential gap - that the Joint Strike Fighter shows up as planned in 2012," he said.
"Right now, from where I''m sitting, I''m reasonably confident - it''s a long way off, but already we need to be in place steps that further signings of MOUs [memorandum of understanding] that''s been done, even later this year."
Capability questioned
There has also been concern in Australia that the JSF may not have the highest ability to evade detection and enemy attack that was initially promised.
Air Commodore John Harvey is the director-general of the RAAF New Air Capability project based in Canberra and says he is very confident the fighter''s stealth capability is high.
"The situation is that there''s been no downgrading of the capability, the requirements are the same, and the aircraft is performing to those requirements," he said.
"What has happened, was there was a re-categorisation of the the terminology in the US and that has lead to the change of one letter in one Powerpoint slide on the Internet - there''s no change to the performance or the capability.
"We''ve been involved in the project now for over three years, we''ve had ... scientists involved in analysing it, we''ve had Australian pilots flying simulated missions, and so we''re very confident in the capability of the aircraft."
He dismisses Federal Opposition concern that the JSF would not be able to effectively compete against some of the Russian-built jets that air forces in Asia, particularly in China, are using.
"We''ve done a lot of analysis of this including simulated activities over here, and the aircraft was designed to meet those future threats and threats that aren''t even flying yet," he said.
"The US don''t spend over $40 billion developing aircraft that''s not going to face future threats."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UK may quit fighter project if US scraps second engine
Washington, AP:
Britain''s participation in a multinational jet fighter project could be jeopardized by the Bush administration''s plan to eliminate funding for a backup engine for the jet...
Britain''s participation in a multinational jet fighter project could be jeopardized by the Bush administration''s plan to eliminate funding for a backup engine for the jet, Britain''s defence procurement minister has said.
Britain expected to be consulted about the decision involving the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, but was not, Lord Peter Drayson said.
His government would have serious concerns about sharing important information on the project should the second engine be scrubbed, he said.
"Without the technology transfer to give us aircraft that are fit to fight on our terms, we will not be able to buy this aircraft," Drayson said.
The minister said he would remain in Washington to meet with the Bush administration. He said Prime Minister Tony Blair has already spoken with Bush and "made absolutely clear the position of Her Majesty''s government on this matter."
The schedule for the project would have the engine made mainly in the US by General Electric Aviation and Britain''s Rolls-Royce.
Britain was the first country to sign on with the US, in 2001, for a project that now includes eight nations besides the United States. Britain''s memorandum of understanding committed it for USD two billion, to buy about 150 planes. If made, the engines would cost USD seven million to USD nine million each.

http://www.cctv.com/news/special/C15427/index.shtml
Được kelvin_01 sửa chữa / chuyển vào 08:11 ngày 17/03/2006

Five Su-27 jet fighters of the Russian Knights aerobatic team fly past Tianmen **** during training for an upcoming performance in Zhangjiajie in central China''s Hunan province Thursday, March 16, 2006. Pilots from the Russian air force team will fly through the **** during three days of performances starting March 17. Tianmen ****, which means the "Gate of Heaven", is 131 metres high, and varies in width from 28 to 57 metres. The performances come days ahead of a visit to Beijing by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who arrives on March 21. (AP Photo/EyePress)

Use this programe to watch the su-27 performance
what is TVKOO : http://www.tvkoo.com/en/aboutus.htm

Đang bay tập, chiều tối nay mới có kết quả

http://www3.ttvnol.com/uploaded2/gulfoil/su****.jpg
http://www3.ttvnol.com/uploaded2/gulfoil/su****.2.jpg
http://www3.ttvnol.com/uploaded2/gulfoil/su****.9.jpg
http://english.people.com.cn//200603/17/eng20060317_251365.html
http://english.people.com.cn//200603/17/eng20060317_251235.html
http://www3.ttvnol.com/uploaded2/gulfoil/su****.10.jpg
Được gulfoil sửa chữa / chuyển vào 21:10 ngày 17/03/2006

Bác nào kiểm chứng tin này với:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2...ent_4314665.htm
Quote:
Russian aircraft not to fly through tourist mountain hole
www.chinaview.cn 2006-03-17 21:56:16
ZHANGJIAJIE, March 17 (Xinhuanet) -- Russian aircraft will not perform any stunt of flying through a tourist mid-air mountain hole in Zhangjiajie, central China''s Hunan Province.
The information was released at a press conference Friday before the aerobatic show was launched.
The decision is made out of consideration on ecological and environmental protection, since heavy aircraft can cause powerful air current when flying low, that might damage both the aircraft and the ****, according to the Russian stunt team at the conference.
More

Tình hình F-35 Mỹ phớt lờ đồng minh.....
Sign up for fighter or pay more later, says US company
AUSTRALIA has been delivered an ultimatum to sign up for the troubled Joint Strike Fighter project or face financial penalties, and an influential US body has warned of huge cost blow-outs and of the aircraft''s untested capability.
The manufacturer of the fighter, Lockheed Martin, made the demand as it confirmed that some countries - possibly including Australia - would get models inferior to those operated by US and British forces.
Yet, according to the US Congress''s au*** and investigative arm, the much vaunted stealth characteristics of the fighter remain worryingly unproven, even for the premier US variant.
Jane''s defence newsletter quoted Lockheed Martin''s senior executive on the project, Tom Burbage, as saying the US wanted a commitment to the fighter by the end of the year in a memorandum of understanding that would last through "the life of the program".
If a customer then declined to go ahead "there will be a penalty associated with the disruption of production planning", Mr Burbage said.
Australia had wanted to defer its final decision on the fighter - the world''s costliest ever military project and one critical to Australia''s future air combat dominance in the region - until 2008. Australia has budgeted to buy as many as 100 of the jets for $15 billion.
The Minister for Defence, Brendan Nelson, did not comment directly on the threat of financial penalties in the proposed memorandum of understanding but said Australia would not sign an unsatisfactory deal. "We are committed to negotiations but we would not sign up to an agreement unless we are satisfied we have all the information we need and it was in Australia''s interests," his spokesman said.
The fighter program has received heavy criticism this week amid threats from partner countries, including Australia, that they will pull out if they do not get access to technology. The US Congress''s Government Accountability Office said there had been inadequate testing on the fighter for it to be considered a mature design and that production should be slowed.
"Significant development risk remains, and it is likely that current cost and schedule goals will not be met," it said in a report.
"To improve the chances for a successful outcome, we are recommending the JSF program delay production and investments in production capability."
The office has strong influence over US legislators, but the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin have insisted that the aircraft''s design is sound. If the Pentagon slows funding and production it will not only increase the price of the aircraft but leave a bigger gap between the scheduled retirement of Australia''s fleet of F-111 and FA-18 jets in 2010-12 and the delivery of their replacements.
The Herald also revealed this week that the fighter''s ability to elude powerful radar had been downgraded.
The Jane''s newsletter said Mr Burbage had told it that different countries would get different versions of the fighter.
?
When pressed, DoD says it could build F-35 without UK
BY: Rebecca Christie, Dow Jones Newswires*
03/17/2006
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The Defense Department''s chief weapons buyer said
Thursday that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program could continue without its
international partners, if current disputes over export controls and engine
makers escalated to a point of no return.
Ken Krieg, the Pentagon''s undersecretary for acquisition, technology and
logistics, said such a showdown was hardly imminent. "I don''t think we''re at
that stage," Krieg said at a House Armed Services Committee panel hearing.
But when pressed, Krieg acknowledged that continuing the program without the
U.K. was possible. Britain is the lead partner on the $256 billion program
headed by Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT).
"Yes, we can build a joint strike fighter," Krieg said, responding to a
barrage of questions from U.S. Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., and chairman of the
subcommittee holding the hearing.
Krieg protested questions that would "speculate" about a negative outcome to
current negotiations. The U.S. wants to work with allied nations to share
development costs, deepen military ties and take advantage of a global supply
chain, he said.
But Weldon pushed for a more definite answer.
"Could you build the program without the Brits? We have to speculate because
we have to make a decision," Weldon said.
The Joint Strike Fighter has come under heavy scrutiny on Capitol Hill this
week because of a new Pentagon plan to cancel the fighter''s alternate engine
program, which is led by General Electric Co. (GE) and U.K.-based Rolls-Royce
PLC (RR.LN). The Senate held two hearings dedicated to the program, followed by
Thursday''s House panel hearing.
Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner, R-Va., has been an
outspoken proponent of the two-engine strategy. Few other lawmakers have taken
up the issue as strongly, however, although they have quizzed Pentagon planners
heavily about the rationale for the move.
U.K. officials oppose cutting the alternate engine, which would give a
monopoly to U.S.-based United Technologies Corp.''s (UTX) Pratt & Whitney unit
for the thousands of F-35 planes expected to be sold around the world.
The U.K. also is concerned about export controls that have so far limited the
transfer of key technology. At a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing this
week, U.K. defense procurement minister Peter Drayson said the U.K. would drop
out of the program if its concerns were not allayed.
The U.K. and other partner nations are working with the Pentagon this year on
a memorandum of understanding for long-term participation in the program.