học tiếng anh cần phải có năng khiếu!

học tiếng anh cần phải có năng khiếu!

Có phải học tiếng anh nói riêng va` các môn ngoại ngữ khác ,cần phải có năng khiếu ,ma` chăm thi` vẫn chưa đủ ,,,,bởi vì nó là sự kết hợp của nhiều kĩ năng ,có phải vậy ko nhỉ ?
Mình nghỉ vậy ,bởi mình hỏi bất cứ ai mọt câu la` phương pháp học ntn ?thi` đều ko có một quy tác nao` cụ thể cả ,
Vậy có ai có thể tổng hợp pp cơ bản được ko nhỉ



 chúng ta là anh em môt nhà

nói thế chứ
chăm cũng là 1 phần quan trọng đấy chứ Lâm???
mà các phương pháp cơ bản thì trong EC có 1 đống ấy
vào menu mà mò
|---------------------------------------------------------------||---------------------------------------------------------------||---------------9--12--9-/10----------------7--10--7-/-9------||---7--9--10-7-------------------5--7--9--5---------------------||-7----------------------------5--------------------------------||---------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------||-----------------------------------------------------------||---------------------15--1715--------------------7--------||---3--5--7--3---7-------------15--------7--9--10----7------||-3------------------------------------7--------------------||-----------------------------------------------------------|

Có năng khiếu thì chắc chắn là sẽ học nhanh và hiệu quả hơn. Nhưng tôi ko cho rằng ko có năng khiếu thì ko học được tiếng Anh. Với tiếng Anh thì học nghiêm túc, chăm chỉ thì chắc chắn sẽ học được.
----------------------------- 010

không có khiếu, học cho biết thì được; học cho giỏi chắc là khó lắm.

Right, to master English you should have both aptitude and industriousness. The environment also plays a crucial part, once you have a chance to live in an English-speaking country, the possibility of speaking a Standard English is definitely much higher.
Oh let''s see what I have... Industriousness? NEVER, shame on me. Capacity: not at all. Environment? I used to live with people using English as their first or second language but not now. That''s why I can''t improve my English and it''s becoming worse and worse each day.
To jbc: We have many topics on method of learning English. You''d better cast a look at the index and pick one to read, remember to do it with due attention if you wish to study English seriously since most topics are fairly long.
So close no matter how far... I have you in my heart and nothing else matters...

Brit,
I might be wrong but I hope you wouldn''t mind if I make some correction in terms of wording for your better written usage.
1. The right word is: industry
2. It''s clearer to say "Your language learning environment"
3. getting is a better choice. You should say: "It''s getting worse!" or "it''s really going down."
4. "English learning methods" is more nativelike.
Have a nice day,
neomentor

You know, there are many ways in which something can be said/expressed, there is no rule book to say "this has to be used ect.." even if one were to be formal. Of course, there are certain boundaries and regulations, but really, is it necessary to pick the sour pickles out of the sweet ones every half a sentence?
-_-;; I don''t understand whether it''s ''trying to improve other people''s language skills'' but I find it highly irritating. No pun intended for anyone, but if someone is wrong, a diplomatic approach should be used, not some blunt comment such as "Hey, your English sucks". This has nothing to do with anything, I realise..however, I just cannot build a bridge and get over myself. -_-
"Gomen nasai....demo..A****erui Sayuri-san.."

okay, think of it this way. If I were not me myself, but a teacher of an English class that you take, then you wouldn''t have that annoyed sensation going on everytime you hear my critique. To put it simply, you feel annoyed because you think others are in no position to judge your ability in such "****y" manner.
well, then, this is my opinion. Everybody''s free to criticize everybody. If one criticizes you and you realize you''re wrong, admit it, try not to get angry. if you think you''re right, fight for it well, in this case, assuming the counterpart also thinks he/she is right, there might possibly be no endpoint to the argument. but others will look at it and he/she who''s wrong but does not admit defeat will look a complete idiot, which makes the whole experience fun, after all.
alas, have I said too much! seriously being critical of others is really not my job; I do it merely for the sake of the above-mentioned fun Pardon my overtly agressive nosiness.

What''''s the difference between industry and industriousness, anyway?
Được britneybritney sửa chữa / chuyển vào 21:09 ngày 07/12/2003