1. Tuyển Mod quản lý diễn đàn. Các thành viên xem chi tiết tại đây

Lớp học tiếng Anh cô giáo PHƯƠNG THÙY (cô Thùy_ED Lò Đúc) - Lớp học TA lâu đời nhất trên TTVNOL từ 2

Chủ đề trong 'Tìm bạn/thày/lớp học ngoại ngữ' bởi thuy_ed, 14/09/2010.

  1. 1 người đang xem box này (Thành viên: 0, Khách: 1)
  1. 04052008

    04052008 Thành viên mới

    Tham gia ngày:
    31/05/2008
    Bài viết:
    110
    Đã được thích:
    0
    Em Lan Phuong - E44 nộp bài ạ

    Many projects of researcher showed that the man can not live if there is no music. According to a result of investigation of American scientist group, 78 per cent people consider that they don’t live if their life has no music. It demotrates that music is an important part of our life.
    Music keeps many to society, example entertaining function, educational function, physiological function. The first function of music is entertainment. The music is kinds of the popular entertainment . It is place who people are enthusiastic music have a chance to show their talent.The music with various banch made people easily chosing kind of music suitable for themselves to relax.
    The second function of music is physiological. music has impact on the physiological aspects of people.By the work of own, two Russian byologist, I.M.Doghen and I.R.Tackhanop demonstrate that music influent to respiratory and circulatory systems. It make people feel comfortable, relaxing or tired, stress. so the music has a large effect on productivity of workers. Workers will forget the tension , fatigue and work more effective.
    The last function of music is education. Many researchers in the field of education has confirmed its position and role of music in social life, especially for raising awareness, personality development. The musical works to express ideas, emotions, ethics, such as love beautiful home, nation, ethnic pride, friendship, love, brotherly love, fatherly love, maternal love, ... always played a special education matter.
    so, music has a huge role in social life, life that no music will be very tedious.
  2. thuhuyenbk

    thuhuyenbk Thành viên mới

    Tham gia ngày:
    14/08/2010
    Bài viết:
    36
    Đã được thích:
    0
    Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
    Chị ơi.Em nộp bài nhé.
    Nguyễn Thị Thu Huyền –E45

    The column graph presents information about the quantity of free time that men and women in different kinds of employment state spent in a week.
    Taking a quick glance at the graph, it can be clearly seen that males of employed full time, unemployed and retired status have more leisure time than females of those. However, the employed part time and housewives women enjoy hours of spare time mostly and those man nearly don’t have free time in a week.
    In ad***ion, it goes without saying that there has be difference about the amount of leisure time between above forms of employment status. Employed full time people spend least spare time, in particularly,it is about 50 hours of free time in a week for men and 39 hours of those for women. Meanwhile, the most quantity of leisure time is enjoyed by unemployed and retired people. It is clearly that it is approximately 95 hours for males and 78 hours for felmales. Moreover, employed part time and housewives women have around 45 hours of free time and 54 hours of those respectively.
    It can be inferred from the graph that the number of leisure time depends on employment status and gender. In fact, people having no job will have much more free time than those having occupation.
  3. nguyenvan1975

    nguyenvan1975 Thành viên mới

    Tham gia ngày:
    05/05/2011
    Bài viết:
    13
    Đã được thích:
    0
    Nguyen Hong Van - E45:
    ĐỀ 5
    The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. (58)


    The chart shows the number of hours of leisure enjoyed by men and women in a typical week in 1998-1999, according to gender and employment status. Those men employed full-time had fifty hours of leisure, whereas women had approximately thirty-seven hours. There were no figures given for men part-time workers, but female part-timers had forty hour of leisure time. Because of reflecting their work in the home, the leisure time of female part-timers had slightly more than women in full-time employment. In the unemployed and retired categories, leisure time showed an increase for both ***es. Men enjoyed more leisure time over fifty hours, compared with seventy hours for women, perhaps reflecting the fact that women spend more time working in the home than men. Finally, housewives enjoyed nearly fifty-four hours of leisure, on average. There were no figures given for househusbands. Clearly, the conclusion is that in the categories for which statistics on male leisure time were available, men enjoyed at least ten hours of extra leisure time.
  4. bigfish

    bigfish Thành viên mới

    Tham gia ngày:
    05/05/2011
    Bài viết:
    4
    Đã được thích:
    0
    em là Nguyễn Phan Thanh Giang E45 nhóm3, nộp bài:
    The pie chart illustrated the percentage of the number of bottle Coca-Cola consumed by the consumers in various markets in the year 2000, and the second line graph showed the change of the Coca-Cola share price from 1996 to 2001.
    At the first chart, the whole of bottles Coca-cola sold in 2000 was 17.1 billion. In ad***ion the biggest consumption was in North America referred to 30.4 %. In Latin America, Europe, Asia the revenues of selling them took 25.7 %, 20.5 %, 16.4 % respectively. Besides, the last 7% was in Africa and Middle East, the smallest demand.
    Looking at the line graph we could see that the Coca-Cola share price jumped from over 30$ in 1996 to nearly 70$ in 1997, then it dipped in the middle of 1997 but it reached to the peak in 1998 about 80$. After that the Coca-Cola share price dropped until the middle of 2000. However, it started to fell down slightly in the last 3 months of 2000, and continued to decline in 2001.
    -----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------
    Thanh Giang E45
    The pie chart illustrated the percentage of the number of bottle Coca-Cola consumed by the consumers in various markets in the year 2000, and the second line graph showed the change of the Coca-Cola share price from 1996 to 2001.
    At the first chart, the whole of bottles Coca-cola sold in 2000 was 17.1 billion. In ad***ion the biggest consumption was in North America referred to 30.4 %. In Latin America, Europe, Asia the revenues of selling them took 25.7 %, 20.5 %, 16.4 % respectively. Besides, the last 7% was in Africa and Middle East, the smallest demand.
    Looking at the line graph we could see that the Coca-Cola share price jumped from over 30$ in 1996 to nearly 70$ in 1997, then it dipped in the middle of 1997 but it reached to the peak in 1998 about 80$. After that the Coca-Cola share price dropped until the middle of 2000. However, it started to fell down slightly in the last 3 months of 2000, and continued to decline in 2001.
  5. nightwing

    nightwing Thành viên mới

    Tham gia ngày:
    05/05/2011
    Bài viết:
    12
    Đã được thích:
    0
    Em là Thanh Sơn - E45 nộp bài nè chị ^^
    The pie chart reveals the number of Coca-cola sold by region in the year 2000 and the line graph illustrates the trend of Coca-cola’s share price from 1996 to 2001.
    It can be seen from the line graph, The Coca-cola’s share price rocketed over the period 1996 to the first six months of 1997. Then, it was a dip in the last two quarters of 1997. The Coca-cola’s share price hit a peak in the middle of 1998, but after that it fell gradually until the end of the first quarter of 2000 it reached nearly 50$ per share. In the year follow, there was a fluctuation in share price of Coca-cola. Regarding to the pie chart, it is obvious that the consumers consumed total 17.1 billion bottles in the year 2000. It related to the biggest consumption was in North America at 30.4%. Less nearly half, namely 16.4% was consumed in Asian. Further more the Latin America and the Europe together accounted for 46.2%. However, Coca-cola‘s sold only 7% product to Africa and Middle East.
    Generally speaking, The share price of Coca-cola has rose dramatically until the middle of 1998 it reached a top. In the following years it remained unstable.
  6. hien_phamthu

    hien_phamthu Thành viên mới

    Tham gia ngày:
    05/05/2011
    Bài viết:
    3
    Đã được thích:
    0
    Em gui chi Thuy bai writing.

    Pham Thu Hien - E45

    De so 5:

    The bar graph indicates the number of leisure hours in a characteristic week used for enjoyment by gender and job status from 1998 to 1999. Taking a quick glance from the graph it can be clearly seen that the people having job were divided into two groups, namely full time and past time. The former presented the approximately equal figure of leisure hours by gender in which male was 44 and female was 39. While the latter had a significant discrepancy, no figure given for male and female stood at 40. The leisure time relaxed by unemployment was absolutely equal to retired people in both of males and females. The figure of the two increased sharply and hit a peak of 80 hours in males, 73 hours in females. Therefore, it goes without saying that the jobless people spent much more leisure time to relax. The females doing housework spent 50 hours per week to enjoy. While there was no figure accounted for males. Overall, it can be referred from the graph that the females worked much more than the males shown clearly in various employment types.

    Cam on chi Thuy
  7. chichky

    chichky Thành viên mới

    Tham gia ngày:
    05/05/2011
    Bài viết:
    7
    Đã được thích:
    0
    Lương Thuỳ Linh - E45
    Đề 4:
    The bar chat illustrates the estimated proportion of people who are unable to write and read by gender and region in the year 2000.
    There are clear differences in level of illiteracy in males and females. There was more women were unable to read and write than men. In some region except Latin American/ Caribbean and Developed countries, the figure for illiteracy in women was significantly higher than in men. In South Asia, the overwhelming majority of illiteracy rate was females about 55% compared only to 33% of males. In Arab States, the level of illiteracy in females was nearly twice as much as this figure in males with 52%, 28% respectively. Whereas, in contrast, there was only gently higher in Developed countries and Latin American/ Caribbean. The lowest rate for female illiteracy was in Developed countries about 2% in contrast to approximately 1% illiteracy rate in males. One example in Latin America/ Caribbean, Where the number of illiterate men, at 10 per 100, is slightly lower than this number in women, at 11 per 100.
  8. huyentran64

    huyentran64 Thành viên mới

    Tham gia ngày:
    24/03/2011
    Bài viết:
    7
    Đã được thích:
    0
    Em Trần Thị Huyên- E45 nộp bài task 1- group 2:

    The line graph reveals a comparision between the volume of visitors to two new music sites on the web namely Music Choice and Pop Parade in fifteen days period of time.
    As can be seen, the noticeable trends that the rates of visits to 2 new music sites follow are fitful. On the 1st day, while Music Choice website assesses 40,000 views, Pop Parade appeals 3 times higher than that. However, the number of viewers to 2 sites deteriorates in the 2nd day, reaching a peak of 60,000 for the former and 120000 for the latter in the 3rd day, then collapsing in the 4th day with the former falls more dramatically than the latter.

    Interestingly, the period from 5th day and 9th day see the same trend of percentage in 2 sites: jumping in the 6th day, dipping in the 7th day, peaking at 40,000 and 50,000 in the 8th day, negligibly dropping in 9th day, Since then, both tend to pursue nearly the opposing trends: the figure in the Pop Parade continuously soars from 40,000 in 9th day to above 150,000 in the 11th day; in contrast, that in Music Choice slightly fluctuates between20,000 and 32,000 in the same period. Then, the number of Pop Parade’s visits goes into free-fall from 11th to 13th day, before skyrocketing to about 170,000 in the last day. Turning to Music Choice, it outstrips from about 22,000 in 11th day to 120,000 in 12th day, fluctuating slightly around that number to 14th day, closing the 15th day at above 70,000.

    Generally speaking, both 2 lines witness erratic ups and downs but there is often more viewers in Pop Parade than that in Music Choice.
    :-bd
  9. kimdung_e44

    kimdung_e44 Thành viên mới

    Tham gia ngày:
    02/03/2011
    Bài viết:
    4
    Đã được thích:
    0
    em Phùng Thị Kim Dung-E44 nộp bài ạ
    Đề 2:
    I think we should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education,Because three following reasons
    Firstly,poor nations without the help of wealthy nations will get poorer,so the share is a useful way to prevent inequalities in the world,Poor nations will be slave to the wealthy.
    Secondly,We all have the love of humanity,.When we see poor nations are facing food shortages, people aren't in school then we have empathy and we can't stand and stare.
    Finally, we should just stop at food and education because if more help poor nations and not only relying on development efforts, then the rich will not call for help that is doing damage them.
    It is the three reason we should join hands to help poorer nations to the world no longer inequality.
  10. thuy_ed

    thuy_ed Thành viên rất tích cực

    Tham gia ngày:
    03/02/2006
    Bài viết:
    5.059
    Đã được thích:
    0
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

Chia sẻ trang này