Lớp học tiếng Anh cô giáo PHƯƠNG THÙY (cô Thùy_ED Lò Đúc) - Lớp học TA lâu đời nhất trên TTVNOL từ 2

em nguyễn hồng nhung E45 NHÓM 4 ĐỀ 29 NỘP BÀI Ạ ^^CHÚC CHỊ ĐI CHƠI VUI VẺ ^^ NHỚ MUA QUÀ CHO CẢ LỚP NHA CHỊ ^^
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} [FONT=&quot]Along with the rapid development of the society, remarkable changes have taken place in the mind of every man.city planners are very often confronted with debate concerning whether an old building should be deconstructed or maintained.i think it depends on whether the targeted building in accordance with the needs of the city.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]A sizable percentage of people assert that some old building are of aesthetic, archaeological or architectural values.there is no denying that there were buildings has the symbol of a city or country and it also giving to a great signification of history,demolition of such buildings will inflict damage to cultural heritage and prevent architects from drawing their inspiratinon from their predecessors.beside, old buildings attract the tourists to promote the beauty of a country.meanwhile, it is worth mentioning that some types of buildings are much more importan than any new building and performing more functions than any new building does.the seccond thing that must be taken into consederation is that it is fair to say that to other old buildings, possessing no specific value while becoming dilapidated, entire destruction is an acceptable and understandable decision.not only it low in quality and poor con***ions as affect landscape of city but also brings a danger on users.i do strongly support the idea that for granted if buildings to break is no long to used to meet the need of the city.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]From what has been discussed above, i think the correct attitude is that what also has advantages and disadvantages it does.whether to conserve or collapse old building people involved should carefully consider before reaching a conclusion.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]

Oh my god, có lớp mổ heo rồi cơ á... chứng tỏ lớp mình chăm hoặc là chưa tới lúc lợn bị lớn
@ chị Thùy: e vừa xem lại, đúng là e có nhầm về thời gian vụ nghỉ. Cảm ơn chị quan tâm về nhóm.

Hiện giờ nhóm có 3 người. Và chắc là tuần tới sẽ xử lý luôn vì giờ đang là mùa hè, mọi người còn thoải mái thời gian, nhưng dự kiến đầu tiên chưa chiến quyển Cam ngay, mà mọi người sẽ đăng kí nghe phần pronunciation và intonation qua bộ đĩa accent training, trả lời câu hỏi Speaking phần 1 kiểu họ tên, nghề nghiệp ... để lấy đà đã, vì phát âm chuẩn sửa càng sớm càng tốt, phần này cá nhân mình đánh giá chưa cao nhắm! Hình như lớp trên cũng phải làm phần này nên mình cứ làm luôn cho lẹ. Sau đó cố gắng tới cuối kì oánh hết 8 quyển Cam, đầu lắc lên lục cục toàn là sỏi thì đi vào vòng bán kết 6 tháng tiếp theo. Đằng nào đi học cũng tốn 4 h mỗi tuần đáng lẽ ra giành để ngủ, với cả nhà điều kiện mình điều kiện cũng không phải là quá cao nên phải nỗ lực thôi (he he)
Nhắc mọi người là học ngoại ngữ nhiều cũng khó coi là đủ được. Mình học tiếng Pháp tổng cộng là 10 năm, cũng đầy bằng khen chứng nhận, sang Pháp nghe người ta nói chả hiểu mấy. Lý do chả phải tại mình ngu, mà vì ngôn ngữ là vô cùng, chưa kể là ngôn ngữ accademic. Xin lỗi mọi người chứ tiếng PHáp để nói được bằng tiếng Anh bạn phải bỏ ra thêm ít nhất 20% sức lực, còn cho tới giờ mình vẫn ko chắc là mình có thể viết 1 câu đúng chính tả từ cái phần căn bản nhất là chia động từ... học mãi mà nghe giảng viên nói nhanh, vẫn không thể nhét vào đầu được, chú ý được 10 phts thì đầu đơ đơ, kiểu treo máy... chưa kể thầy cô đến từ các tỉnh, dân lai... có giọng nói khác tiếng gốc chuẩn thì đúng là bó tai.
Nên mọi người nên học thêm một chút vì tương lai thôi, nếu mọi người xác định đi gặt lấy cái bằng lấy học bổng. Nếu đặt target đủ để đi xin học bổng, khoảng 6.5 thì sợ là lên lớp chỉ ngồi ngáp ruồi thôi, đi du học có lẽ đủ để bạn không lạc đường chứ thực sự hiểu đuợc và tiêu hóa được những gì mà cơ hội đem lại cho mình thì có lẽ là mơ giữa ban ngày. Còn đi làm trong nước từng nấy điểm chắc cũng ngon rồi. Có người bảo rằng hòa nhập vào môi trường thì sẽ tăng trình nhanh, mình nghĩ là chỉ tăng trình đi chợ là nhanh, còn thực sự khi vào học, thì có những cái tiếng việt chả hiểu được chứ nói gì đến tiếng anh. Chịu khó đặt mục tiêu cao cao bên cửa sổ mà học.

Mời mọi người tham gia group, miễn là thành viên của nhóm thì có thể gửi bài đọc bài vô tư. Cơ chế mở ai tham gia cũng được.
Google Group gần giống forum nhưng tiện hơn là chỉ cần gửi thư vào hòm chung là ok rồi, muốn tra lại bài cũng vào trang của nhóm là xong.

Trang chủ: http://groups.google.com/group/cambridgeielts Email của nhóm: cambridgeielts@googlegroups.com

Normal 0 false false false VI X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; line-height:150%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Arial; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Arial; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} Nguyễn Công Tiến E45 Nhóm 2
Topic 24: The leisure industry is growing rapidly. The active role of modern technology in people's leisure lives nowadays has made them less creative. Do you agree or disagree?


[FONT=&quot] In recent years, leisure industry is becoming increasingly popular at an annual rate. There has been a perception that the development of modern technology has made people less creative. On the other hands, my opinion differs as I believe that people will more creative with advance of technology. [/FONT][FONT=&quot]There are numerous reasons why I hold this opinion, and I would explore a few of the most important ones here.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]The first reason that can be seen by every person is that[/FONT][FONT=&quot] the maturity and popularity of mobiles or computers has given users more chances to enhance their intelligence. They make people easy to work, connect with friends, family, play games when having free times. Moreover, with the expansion of software industry, entertainment seekers can create new softwares, applications, games for their different purposes. They can earn a lot of moneys by selling their products. It improves peoples abilities as well. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]There is another factor[/FONT][FONT=&quot] that some people might argue that watching TV, a common leisure activity, has seriously effected the viewers' development in creativity. They think that TV viewers are passive when absorbing information presented by TV and respond with no active thinking. However, there is evidence that television programmes are becoming increasingly educational and instructive. For example, science channels, such as Discovery, given watchers more knowledge. While cartoon or education programmes make children more active and intelligent.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that[/FONT][FONT=&quot] modern technologies, as shown in above discussion, have made people more creative, and also given them more enjoyment in leisure activities.[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]I believe that not only the advance of technology improve their ability of creativity, but also give them more enjoyment in leisure activities.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]

Chị Thùy yêu quý,em là Diệu Linh ở lớp E48 ạ,bao giờ chị mở lớp Speaking Ielts thì chị thông báo cho em với nhé ' border=0 alt="" src="images/smilies/9.gif" smilieid="110">

em Thanh Sơn -E45

task 2: topic 11 : Some people argue that the government should spend money only on medical care and education but not on theatres or sport stadiums. Do you agree or disagree?
With the advance of human civilization, there are an increasing number of people who have raised doubts about whether the government should spend budget on some fields that bring immediate and tangible benefit to public, such as medical care and education system, meanwhile, some people believe that government should invest in theatres and sport stadiums for urban development. From my own perspective, these education and medical care are more necessary than theatres and sport stadiums for development of society, However the government can distribute reasonably the budget to meet the need of both
Education is an important essential of a developed society. Lot of governments consider that illiteracy is the cause make a nation weak and depressed, so that education always highly respected in any nations, particularly in developed countries. By sending children to school, children of poor family can have a better live. Also education guarantee a stable job for people. With a country, education can make a skilled workforce bringing high productivity. From these examples we can see that a nation with good education system can pave the way for economic development.

Beside a developed education system, a society also need a good medical care in order to improving the public. A nation with high quality of heath care and affordable medical service proof that nation is developed society. By providing the needy people with medical service, the citizen feel assuredliving and working in a country where they can be given medical service when unemployed, sick, injured or retired. So they can work more activity, even the work can affect to their health. By imagine, the undeveloped countries have poor medical care, these people cannot afford to buy drugs, they also suffer lot of diseases, they are less likely enjoy their living.

Although education and medical services are fundamental to the stability and development of a society, it is not to say that theatres sport stadiums have no support to the public. We can see that, if there were no theatres or sport stadiums, what should we do to entertain after along day with full of pressure? Our live would become bored. But we cannot die without them. In contract, we can die without education and medical services. However, after attained basic con***ions for a good living such as education and heath care, people turn to higher aspiration. So depending on budget of each country, the governments can invest in all of them appropriately.

From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that depending on countries situation and budget , the government can decide which sectors to spend money on in order to bring benefit to public.

-----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------
EM Thanh Giang- E45
task 2- topic 11:Some people argue that the government should spend money only on medical care and education but not on theatres or sport stadiums. Do you agree or disagree?


With the advance of the human civilization, there are an increasing number of people who have raised doubts about whether government should fund the sectors that bring tangible and immediate benefits to the public, such as medical care and educational systems, while there is an opponent suggest that government should use the budget on theatres or sport stadiums for the urban developments. From my own perspective, the two opinions can be reconciled and the government can coordinate budgeting to meet the needs of both.
Medical care is an essential to the society of the country, particularly of an underdeveloped country. Important as the Government interference in health care and medical service is, the medical service becomes affordable thank to government subsidy. Imagine without the help of government in this field, while the cost of visiting clinic, hospitalization and cost of medicines are too high for the people live in poverty, there would be no way for them to enjoy their life when unemployed, sick, injured or retired. So, by offering people in need the health care and medical service, they will feel happy and more loyal to the county.
About the education, we all know how important it is for an individual and a country. It is one of the criteria of good living standard. Both empirical knowledge and academic research suggest that making education available throughout a country and eliminating illiteracy can pave the way for economic development. The children received the education tend to have the brighter than the uneducated ones. The good education is the tool for them to pave the way to a good living. Indeed, thank to education, people can get qualification and become qualified workforce. That means they can get good job with good income, even archive higher success, and that guarantee a better life for them far away from poverty.
Although education and medical services are fundamental to the stability and development of a country, it is not to say that there is no point in investing in theatres or sport stadiums. In the hierarchy of human needs, according to the theory of Maslow, when the basic need is met, there will be a higher need to archive. What I mean is that when the society develops at high pace then there will be more needs arise. Entertainment is one of them. Theatres or sport stadium can satisfy the entertainment demand of the citizens. In other hand, the expen***ure for building theatre or sport stadium is worth considering for the government. Building them is depend on the national budget. In the situation of poor budget, government could find other way for meeting the entertainment needs of citizen with less money such as country fairs,…
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that the government should prior the expen***ure for education and medical care. It can improve the living standard of the citizens. When their life is better, they can pay more tax, that means more money for national budget.

Em Luong Thuy Linh - E45

Topic 32: Do you think a museum is to educate or entertain people?
With the advance of the human civilization, there are an increasing number of people who have raised doubts about the role of museum. A sizable percentage of people assert that museums are of great educational value. However, there are some people who strongly hold the view that museums are intended for entertainment. From my own perspective, a museum can have dual functions. There are numerous reasons why I hold this opinion, and I would explore a few of the most important ones here.
The first reason that can be seen by every person is that museums convey knowledge to visitors through different ways. By acquiring, conserving, researching and exhibiting a great variety of artifacts an specimens, museums enables the visitors to acquire something about the specific issue such as history, art, environment and technology that they did not obviously know. Therefore, the history about the museum’s exhibition need to be interpreted, this can be done in various means. Some museums have trained professional guide to talk to their visitors, meanwhile, others use headsets in order to provide detailed commentary about the exhibition. Furthermore, many museums even offer the professional specialist to make a speech regularly in different subjects, which is informative for visitors. In those ways, the museum has an important role in teaching people about many aspects of life.
The second thing that must be taken into consideration is that the museums serve for entertainment business. First of all, museums are attractive destination of tourists who desire to see many interesting collected object. The number of visitors will decrease gradually if he of she has to listen too much academic content, therefore, many museum give prominence to the aim to bring enjoyment than learning. Furthermore, the museums have to balance their budget, many museum require the entrance fee. Thus, they operate more activities to attract more people to visit in order to making ad***ional fee for cover costs. For example, many museums engage in many category such as film, musical or dance performances that bring the pleasure for the visitors.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that an attractive museum should provide an enjoyable and instructive experience so that visitors can satisfy the demand both entertainment and learning new knowledge at the same time.

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} [FONT=&quot]Bích Ngọc- E45- Group1- topic 1[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Along with the development of society, more and more problems are brought to our attention, one of which is that travel is becoming increasingly prevalent at an annual rate. [/FONT][FONT=&quot] Travel between countries is a part of globalization which is a catch-all term refering to any activity involving more than one country. In recent years, there are many controversy over positive effect as well as negative effect of this trend on the individual country, especially those new member states of globalization.[/FONT]

Some people claim that the travel development brought about intensify of the number of tourist. They bring the differences unable to accept. Automaticaly, the local inhabitant have a hostility instead of promoting mutual cultural background. Nevertheless, this view should be rejected as we can remove that contrast and one can see many facts in favour of this development between countries.
[FONT=&quot]After careful consideration of the above reasons, I, personally, stand on the side of the advocates. There are numerous reasons why I hold this opinion, and I would explore a few of the most important ones here. [/FONT][FONT=&quot]The first reason why international travels would never bring conflict is rooted in the fact that both visitors and locals are economically motivated. International travel opens up opportunities for business development throughout the world. The international trade is rocket drammatically. In ad***ion to this, the market of the companies are not only limited in a national scale but also expanded all over the world. However, in order to creat con***ion for cooperation, both vistors and local should have useful actions such as locals should show their hospitality to visitors and foreigners should learn the culture of a country before winning over the local people. Reling on this, we would never be in position to encounter with uncomfortable when anyone do not understand our culture and not regard to environment.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]There is a further more subtle point we must consider is that [/FONT][FONT=&quot]traveling help us to have diversified views, whereby we would have wide and deep knowledge about the social and cultural background of many countries over the world . Obviously, we can know to observe other cultures. One we have respect and understanding together, we will find the same position on many issues.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that traveling contribute a significant role in promoting mutual feature between countries. We should traveling around the world to get fresh knowledge and have a plesant time.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]

EM NGA E42
The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twenty years. Many of the problems young people now experience, such as juvenile delinquency, arise from the fact that many married women now work and not at home to care for their children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?


From the very beginning of existence of humankind, women was given the role of taking care of house work and children by society in almost every culture. Meanwhile, men was obligated to provide food and major needs of the family. This trend has changed since 1980s and now a majority of women are working for several reasons such as the need of socialising and sharing the burden of husband. However, it was then claimed that the children were badly affected and having lots of problems such as behavial disorder without the care of mother. Just as I support the idea of women working, I also admit that in some cases this situation affects children in a bad way.

First, there is an undeniable necessary need of having a role in social life for women. They have the need of being more independent and self-confident. Working is an option to satisfy this need and become social individuals. Due to the fact that there will be no parent to take care of children during work hours, someone is hired to take on this duty. In spite of this, they leave the children to their grandparents to take care of. Both situations can be considered a temporary solution.

On the other hand, it is admittedly a big amount of time that any parents will not be able to spend with their children during work hours.It can not be guaranteed that children who are taken care of by their own mothers will not experience any problems in life, but there is no doubt that the children will not have the lack of mother care and their personalities will not be shaped without parents' protection and care.

In conclusion, it is possible to find temporary solutions to take care of children
while mother is working, but i believe that any other solutions can not replace. It is certainly true that the position of women in society has undergone a dramatic change in the past twenty years but I do not feel that this is a direct cause of the indisputable increase in juvenile-related problems during this period.

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} [FONT=&quot]EM VIỆT E42

The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life. In what extent do you agree or disagree?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]

Throughout the history, people had seen and are seeing a lot of changes. One of those changes is the tendency in choosing profession. In the past, people preferred having a single career in a single profession. Yet in our modern life, people usually look for chances by different ways, for example working in several places or continuing education. It is difficult to say what is better, but I would like to go deeper into the raised issue.

In the past time, regions isolated from each to others. People could focus and enhance own abilities in only one thing: planting some kinds of fruits, feeding animals, etc. Their products then were bought by the other regions. The better their products were, the more money they could get. There were villages, where all people had the same profession, and their villages became famous by their products.

But in our modern life, everything is changed. Thanks to better methods of transport, faster way to communicate each to other, people becomes more and more connected. Everything can be copied and duplicated, yet can be even developed to the better.

Some people become richer and richer, their products become better and better and sometimes they force other people to the unemployment because the second group of people can not produce as good as the first one. They then have to find other careers. It becomes true that the more things people can do, the more chances they could have to find a good job. Some people decide to have several jobs to get more salaries; other people continue their further education to look for better chance to get jobs.

It can be seen that, the choice having only one career or finding chances in many profession and further education is not just a fad. It is mainly because of demand *****rvive of people.[/FONT]

E Hương Giang- E45- Nộp bài topic 33- writing task 2 chị nhé!
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} Along with the development of society, more and more problems are brought to our attention, one of which is employee benefits, especially working hours. Although the extension of working hours is believed to have impact on general well-being and result in work-family conflict and job stress, this practice is remarkably popular in many countries. I do strongly support the idea that long working hours have negative impact upon individual, the organization they work for, and ultimately upon the national economy and society as a whole.
There are many reasons supporting my view.
To employee, working long hours can cause at least two problems. First of all, the extension of working hours damage personal relationship, disrupt social life and community activities. In the last, people used to communicate with others more than nowadays. After work, they used to go out with their family for dinner, took care of their children and housework, jointed community activities with their neighbors. But now, long work hours make them tired so they don’t want to joint any activities, they also don’t have time to take care of their own family. Instead of face to face meeting each other, they rely much on high technology, they connect with others by internet, such as facebook. The second thing that must be taken into consideration is that long working hours also cause stress and occupational diseases. For example, officers usually sitting in front of computer have to face with normal diseases related to eye, backache, sciatica…Moreover, people having long working hours don’t have time to relax, so they feel stressed all the time, it lead to a psychological disturbance.
To employers, long working hours, although promising maximum benefit from limited resources every now and then, have destructive effects in the long term. When the employees have to work long hours, they aren’t as active and productive as normal so it can lead to lower quality of products or lower capacity. In ad***ion, long working hours also accompany with a greater risks of employees’ sickness. As a result, employers have to spend much more on hospital fees, insurance fees or expen***ure on recruiting and training new workers.
To economy of a country as a whole, long working hours has chronic effects. When economy is more development, living con***ion is improved, people are unwilling to work long hours so it tends to put pressure on the employment market. A high unemployment rate is always regarded as a threat to a country’s economy.
Some may argue that the scarcity of natural resources forces employers to exploit labour to achieve highest benefit. Furthermore, working longer hours is still in allowed restriction of human tolerance so it doesn’t harm anything. From my own perspective, I think it is all quibble for exploitability.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that there is no reason why working long hours is acceptable. We must fight to have better working con***ions and less working hours.