Lớp học tiếng Anh cô giáo PHƯƠNG THÙY (cô Thùy_ED Lò Đúc) - Lớp học TA lâu đời nhất trên TTVNOL từ 2

Yên tâm đi, em viết cũng tốt thế còn gì, nói phát âm cũng ổn, tại em ko sắp xếp đc nhiều thời gian học và đi học nên cảm giác mất yên tâm thôi
Cố gắng đầu tư thêm time là ổn [r2)] (Chị hay đùa nên em phải đề phòng nhá )

UPDATE THÔNG TIN KHAI GIẢNG LỚP GẦN NHẤT:


[r32)][r32)][r32)]LỚP KĨ NĂNG TỔNG QUÁT + pre. IELTS:[FONT=[/IMG]ƯU ĐIỂM CỦA KHÓA HỌC: Vì sao bạn nên chọn khóa học này?
[r32)]Giúp bạn lấy lại từ gốc rễ kiến thức Ngữ pháp – Phát âm – Từ vựng – Thao tác dịch thuật cơ bản trong tiếng Anh
[r32)]Là khóa học chuẩn mẫu cho đối tượng ôn thi Cao học & Nghiên cứu sinh
[r32)]Là khóa học kĩ năng dìu dắt những người bắt đầu học ôn IELTS
[r32)]Là khóa học hiệu quả, học viên sẽ học dưới sự nghiêm khắc của GV kiểm tra, đôn đốc, thu bài vở hàng ngày, kết hợp học và chữa bài online

Trong quý 3/2011, Mrs. Thuy_ED có dự kiến khai giảng lớp mã số E52 với lịch như sau:

[r32)] Lớp mã E52:
* Thời gian học: 7.30-9.00pm thứ 2; 7.30-9.00pm thứ 5; 10.00-11.30am Chủ nhật
*Dự kiến khai giảng: 08/08/2011
*Thời lượng khóa học: 4,5 tháng
* Học phí: 8.000.000 VND (gồm học phí 4,5 tháng học trực tiếp cùng GV trên lớp + các đơn vị học Writing & Speaking online + giáo trình)

[r32)][r32)][r32)] Lớp IELTS TARGET BAND 7 + (Mã: E53)

ƯU ĐIỂM CỦA KHÓA HỌC: Vì sao bạn nên chọn khóa học này?
[r32)] GV cung cấp tất cả kĩ năng làm bài thi từng kĩ năng thành phần trong kì thi IELTS
[r32)] GV luyện tập cho HV nói trôi chảy, phát âm chuẩn, như phong cách người bản xứ
[r32)]GV cùng HVthực nghiệm, chia sẻbài viết IELTS
[r32)]GV cùng HV luyện tập làm các đề thi IELTS cập nhật nhất
[r32)]GV cung cấp cho HV theo yêu cầu nguồn tài liệu ôn thi IELTS dồi dào, phong phú nhất

[r32)]Lớp mã E53:
* Thời gian học: 3 buổi 1 tuần gồm: 7.30-9.00pm thứ 4 và 8.00 - 9.30am Chủ nhật + buổi học Speaking nhóm nhỏ HV được chọn giờ khi đăng kí: 5.30pm thứ 5 hoặc 10am thứ 7 (lưu ý: giờ chọn ưu tiên cho những HV đăng kí sớm nhất, trong trường hợp thời điểm bạn đăng kí, 1 ngày học lựa chọn đã full, bạn phải chấp nhận ngày còn lại)
*Dự kiến khai giảng: 07/09/2011
*Thời lượng khóa học: 5 tháng
*Học phí: 9.000.000 VND (gồm học phí 5 tháng học trực tiếp cùng GV trên lớp + các đơn vị học Writing & Speaking online + giáo trình)

ĐỂ GHI DANH VÀO LỚP HỌC:
Các bạn vui lòng qua đóng học phí trực tiếpvới GV: Mrs. Thuy_ED tại địa chỉ lớp học: 103-khu 18- Ngõ 108 Lò Đúc – HN (trước khi qua các bạn hẹn trước qua ĐT để tránh vào giờ dạy của GV)
hoặc
chuyển khoản qua TK của GV: TK Techcombank Hà Nội: 14024431228016 - chủ TK: Nguyễn Phương Thùy (sau khi CK, các bạn nhắn tin vào ĐT của cô giáo tên đầy đủ, số ĐT, đ/c email của người học).
Chú ý: Tất cả các lớp nhận những học viên đăng kí = đóng học phí sớm nhất và không nhận thêm khi lớp đã đủ sĩ số.
Cảm ơn sự quan tâm theo dõi của các bạn! Hy vọng được học cùng các bạn với tinh thần hợp tác [r2)][r2)][r2)]

Nhược điểm của e là hay tự ái mà ss ơi! Chị cho e đăng kí 1 suất học lớp E53 và buổi speaking lúc 5h30 nhé! Đến cuối năm e phải thi rồi ss ơi! E lo quá, liệu học có kịp không chị?

em Thanh Son- E45 nop bai
Topic 61: Some people strongly oppose animal experimentation, believing that it causes pain to animals, while some other people consider it necessary. What is your opinion?

With the advance of human civilization, there are an increasing number of people who have raised double about whether animal experimentation causes pain to animal, while a sizeable of people consider it necessary. From my own prospective, experiments are essential to both the well-being of human beings and that of animals.
Fist of all, Animal bear a close resemblance to humans, either in behaviour or in cell structure. They respond to external disturbances nearly in the same manner as humans do. More over, animals testing proves one of the main approaches to predict the risk when drugs or other products are used on humans. Using direct experiment on humans might have bad effect to humans joining the experiment, it also maintain human Rights issue. For these reasons, using experiment on humans should be replaced on animals
Another fact *****pport animal-based experiment is that animals are not the equivalent of humans, and can be used as resources for human purposes, these animals bring into experimentation are species that capable of rapid reproduction such as guinea pigs, hamsters, … These species also have a little affect to the eco-system, if one of these species were extinct, the ecosystem would still in balance.

There is another factor that deserves some words here, Human use animal experiments not only for their interests but also for the interests of animals. For example, some medical discoveries can be used by veterinary surgeons to give medical care and treatment to sick animals. Nowadays, when scientists are empowered to carry out cruel experiments like vivisection, researchers also have the obligation to reduce animal testing and animal suffering

*****mmarize, one can subscribe to the notion that animals can be taken as resources intended for the benefit of humans, although meanwhile it is certain that suffering should be controlled to the minimum during experimentation.






-----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------
Em Thanh Giang E45 nop bai

Topic 64 : Discuss the arguments for and against raising pets.
Human have been keeping pets for almost as long as we have been living in house .With the advance of the human civilization, there are an increasing number of people who have raised doubts about whether we should raise pets for their benefits. While there is an opponent believes that we can not keep animal because it is breach of animal rights. Below are some arguments concerning pet ownership.
Most animal were originally brought into households to work, as hunting dogs or using cats to catch mice for example. But the advantages of keeping a pet go far beyond simply using them as labour. Pet are widely accepted as having good effect on your health. Indeed, animals can also have positive impact on your emotion and metal well. The pressures of modern lifestyle are tremendous. Compared to previous generations, people are more likely to live independently and away from their families at the present time. Adopting a pet animal as a companion can give quality to the owner's life, and help reduce stress and blood pressure. Another positive aspect of keeping pets is that it nourishes and enhances love, emotion and responsibility from the keepers. To illustrate, learning to care for a pet helps a child to grow up as a loving adult who feels responsible for whoever he loves .Thus, pets provide important companionship and support role or even a health treatment.
Raising pets benefits pets as well. Giving companionship and pleasure to their owners, pets receive loving care and attention in return. Some might argue that holding a pet is unnatural because pet animals would lose their original way of life.
However, people should aware of that there is no guarantee that your pets can live in wild life. Without our feeding, animals have to struggle for food clean water and other necessities which are hardly exist in wild environment. Hence, Pets could die easily without people care.
There is another factor that deserves some words here. It is the moral problem of the owner. Ignorance of an animal's needs for space, exercise or contact with members of the same species, for instance, has been found as a common problem with raising pets. Some people are likely to kill their pets due to lack of knowledge or even some people rob the pets to sell to the restaurants. It is really a breach of animal rights. When holding pet animals has become popular, other problems will result.

From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that raising pets can be either good or bad, it is depend on their owners. Pets can give people companionship and great pleasure and they receive a caring home in return. On the other hand, there are dangerous existent breach of animal rights.

Nguyễn Thị Hồng Nhung_ E49
800x600 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}



There are a lot of the major sporting events taking place throughout the countries over the world. trailed by as many of the different opinions directions surrounding the host major sports leagues of the country.
In fact, many people assume that there will be a lot of benefits for a country to host a major sporting event. One of the benefits that is the benefits of travel. There will be plenty of tourists to participate in sports activities, and will tour the attractions and learn about the culture. People can exposure and exchanges with the novelties things coming from new friends. This not only bring economic benefits but also helps promote the image of the country with friends around the world. A major sporting event will make sense of sports of people and ethnic pride is enhanced.
However, some people believe, a major sporting event took place is going to happen a lot of problems. One of them is the issue of security, there are too many who gathered in a place that will requires taking control of security must be top concerns. Besides, there are problems with food, environmental pollution and social evils. These problems is really worrying if countries do not have effective remedies.
Every year there are many active sports notable such as Olympic, wold cup, sea games, ... in my opinion, the host the Olympic or any of the major sports activity are beneficial about economic, cultural and political. But the present entirely welcomed and supported.
We cannot deny the benefits brought to the people and the country when host a major sporting event. I fully believe that the government can limit the negative happens to a big tournament really brings joy, happiness and benefits to people.

Em Hoàng Hải Yến E-49 nộp bài writing
Everything has a good side and a bad side, and to host a major sports competiton is no exception. A majority of people take the view that a country has many advantages from being a host country of a major intenational event. However, there is also someone who strongly advocates that the country can face to problems. From my own perspective, I agree with the idea that the country will get some troubles because of the follwing reasons.
The first reason that can be seen by every person is that many foreign visitors will arrive to the host, which makes national security risk. Fighting will occur between fans of winning and losing team. Especially in Vietnam, when the home team wins, most of people go down on the streets for cheering, which is the cause of traffic jam and more dangerous is that the young is always riding motors exceeding the speed in the night.
Another reason why I prefer the argument is that Governments promise benefits when they spend money to host events, but there's a lot of economic research, and the evidence quite strongly suggests that there are only very limited economic benefits. The Olympics next year in London, the 2012 World Cup, etc have turned into drains on public budgets. With the World Cup, corporations like Coca-Cola, Panasonic, ... are ready to pay millions of dollars to be sponsors. The amount of money is used for many aims, including building stadium. It would be better off building roads and flats and new commercial properties than building stadiums, because stadiums just aren't used enough. And particularly, the stadiums and arenas that you build for a major event never get used to the same extent afterwards. Said that hosting major sports event is a way of marketing country is not sure as you would pay in terms of marketing, it would certainly be worth millions of dollars.
Once you have known all of these, you must agree with me that the benefit is not big if you compare it to the expense that governments have to go to in order to host these events.

Em: Mai Thị Hà – E49

Topic: Some people believe it is better for governments to spend any available money for sports on providing facilities for the general population. Others believe that instead they should invest in training top athletes to win major competitions.
Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.

Governments often do not feel easy to decide a policy or set up a project because their deciments usually can not fit everyone and using sport budget is no exception. Many people have the idea that governments should spend sport money for ordinary people, however there are also a sizable percentage of people who think that it is better to invest in excellent athlestes. I personally have my own oppinion which I will state in this essay.
There is no double about the huge advantages of encouraging ordinary people doing sports such as prevent diseases, strengthen co-operative spirit, try hard, etc. In a country, if people love doing sports the population will be healthier, the number of people become overweight and have other disease like diabetes will be smaller. Moreover, taking part in sports activities, particularly team games, can help children learn to be more co-operative, more strong after lose, so that they can grow up with the development of both mind and body. Finally, governments should spend money on general population to reduce levels of health problems because “prevent is better than cure”.
Nevertheless, we cannot deny that spending money to help top athletes win has its own strong points. Firstly, the winning of an excellent athlete or a team can make people proud of their country and become more believe in the governments. Secondly, famous athletes make their country also famous. This lead to a good affect on the development of tourism and even economy of their country. Thirdly, famous sport people can be a good role models for the population in general and the young in particular. Perhaps, they will go on to become successful athletes themselves.
From my own perspective, governments should spend sport budget on both ordinary people and top athletes because one country will only become strong when its population are healthy, believe in governments and proud of their nation.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that governments should be wise when make decision about spending money on sports. That decision must care both ordinary people and excellent athletes in order to make the country stronger.

Em là Nguyễn Hường lớp E49 ạ. Chị iu quý ơi, mong chị thông cảm cho em nhé vì em làm nhầm đề ạ [r32)] ! E làm xong rùi, đến khi nói chuyện với Chiến em mới phát hiện ra em nhầm. Nhưng giờ làm lại thì em không kịp chuẩn bị bài cho thứ 2 và thứ 3. Dạo này em vừa bị ép tiến độ trên công ty, lại vừa thi học kỳ ở trường nên đầu óc em hơi liêng biêng chị ạ. E hứa lần sau tỉnh táo hơn ạ.[r2)]. Thanks chị nhìu!!!

Topic: Some people believe that it is good for country host a sports competition. Others think it causes many problems for the country.​

​

Everything has a negative side and a positive side, and a country hosts a major sports competition is no exception.​

There are many arguments in favour of the idea that it is good for a country to host a major sports competition. Firstly, this is opportunity for people all over the world can exchange each other and other countries know culture of the host country. Moreover, country gets large income from tourists and businesses which want to advertise their brand. For example, hotels, souvenir shop for tourists have many customers. Finally, if the event is organized successfully, country’s prestige is improved on the international. ​

On the other hand, there are many problem for the country. If the country is poor, this event is difficulty in financial situation. For example, government must spend much money for building sport complex. When the event finished, the sport complex rarely is used and this is cause of waste of budget. Therefore, necessary social projects are not invested. In ad***ion, security issue is really difficult to organizer and the authorities. For instant, there are many terrorist and extremist come here. This is reason for many innocent civilians are in danger. Futhermore, the event is hosted in big cities, so many people in other provinces feel injustice. ​

From my own perspective, if a country has enough economic resource and good security system, should host a major sports competition. In contrast, it is better for developing countries need to upgrade in social infrastructure. ​

------​

Have a nice weekend and see you on next Monday !​

MicrosoftInternetExplorer402DocumentNotSpecified7.8Normal0Chị ơi, em Nguyễn Thị Thu Huyền nộp bài nhé!

Group 5: Topic 69​

Do you think it is better to send criminals to jail or let them receive education or job training?

In our time and age, much debate has taken place about whether it is better to put criminals in prison or allow them to get education or occupational training. Some people are concerned that individuals break the law must be sent to jail, in order that they no longer do wicked things and contaminate law-abiding citizens. Nervertheless, there are a majority of people who have the idea that imprisonment is a less effective kind of punishment and some alternatives, perhaps give more advantages. From my own perspective, imprisonment is only considered as the last resort.
As you can see, education is an essential factors to reform offenders. In my opinion, in an environment without good education, it is easy for a person to become a criminal. With a low level of knowledge, he isn't able to distinguish good things and bad things in society and control him activities that have serious influences on society. Therefore, offenders should be received education with the aim that they can recognize their faults and make a wise decision that they will accept the rehabilitaton of society in order to start a new life like a good person. Furthermore, education allows criminals to keep in touch with the community as well as make an opportunity that all prisoners are normally deprived of. In ad***ion to this, education also prevents them from indigne impacts arises from offenders's peer group, because by getting education in a secure environment, criminals have lower chance of re-offending.
Likewise, work is also an important resort for offenders to train themselves. It is said that the devil makes work for idle hands. If a person doesn't have a job to make sure his living, sooner or later he will do things have negative influences on other people. On the other hand, money is living aim for criminals and the most important in their life. Consequently, they defied all things to make a lot of money though those things are illegal. Job training enables them to acquire earning capacity and become good citizens. Thanks for vocational training, offfenders have an opportunity to behave normally towards their family or society and society will lose these productive members.
However, to special criminals, who have committed offences repeatedly and shown little repentance, education and occupational training might not make any remarkable difference. In this case, the best way to improve them is imprisonment. Be put in prison offenders aren't affected by social temptations. Then, jail is considered as an invisible wall that it isolates criminals from the outside world.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that imprisonment is only actually effective for habitual offenders who are very likely to commit repeated acts of violence. On the contrary, education and job training are pretty suitable for those who committed less serious crimes, preventing them from becoming re-offenders after setting free.
-----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------
MicrosoftInternetExplorer402DocumentNotSpecified7.8Normal0Chị ơi, em Nguyễn Thị Thu Huyền nộp bài nhé!
Group 5: Topic 69
Do you think it is better to send criminals to jail or let them receive education or job training?

In our time and age, much debate has taken place about whether it is better to put criminals in prison or allow them to get education or occupational training. Some people are concerned that individuals break the law must be sent to jail, in order that they no longer do wicked things and contaminate law-abiding citizens. Nervertheless, there are a majority of people who have the idea that imprisonment is a less effective kind of punishment and some alternatives, perhaps give more advantages. From my own perspective, imprisonment is only considered as the last resort.
As you can see, education is an essential factors to reform offenders. In my opinion, in an environment without good education, it is easy for a person to become a criminal. With a low level of knowledge, he isn't able to distinguish good things and bad things in society and control him activities that have serious influences on society. Therefore, offenders should be received education with the aim that they can recognize their faults and make a wise decision that they will accept the rehabilitaton of society in order to start a new life like a good person. Furthermore, education allows criminals to keep in touch with the community as well as make an opportunity that all prisoners are normally deprived of. In ad***ion to this, education also prevents them from indigne impacts arises from offenders's peer group, because by getting education in a secure environment, criminals have lower chance of re-offending.
Likewise, work is also an important resort for offenders to train themselves. It is said that the devil makes work for idle hands. If a person doesn't have a job to make sure his living, sooner or later he will do things have negative influences on other people. On the other hand, money is living aim for criminals and the most important in their life. Consequently, they defied all things to make a lot of money though those things are illegal. Job training enables them to acquire earning capacity and become good citizens. Thanks for vocational training, offfenders have an opportunity to behave normally towards their family or society and society will lose these productive members.
However, to special criminals, who have committed offences repeatedly and shown little repentance, education and occupational training might not make any remarkable difference. In this case, the best way to improve them is imprisonment. Be put in prison offenders aren't affected by social temptations. Then, jail is considered as an invisible wall that it isolates criminals from the outside world.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that imprisonment is only actually effective for habitual offenders who are very likely to commit repeated acts of violence. On the contrary, education and job training are pretty suitable for those who committed less serious crimes, preventing them from becoming re-offenders after setting free.

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
Trần Thị Hiền lớp E_49
Em nộp bài writing chị nhé! Chúc chị cuối tuần vui vẻ ạ!


TOPIC: Some people believe it is better for governments to spend any available money for sports on providing facilities for the general population. others believe that instead they should invest in training top athletes to win major competitions.
Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.



There is no denying that everything has more than one face and the way how the government spend on money to development sport is no exception. The problem are some people believe it is better for the governments to spend any available money for sport on provinding facilities for the generral population. Others believe that instead they should invest in training top athetes to win major competitions.
At the opinon of the fist one we can clearly see that when the governments uses money for sports in general that means they are improving their people’s heath because doing sport can prevent people from becoming overweight, moreover practice sport can help people stronger and stay away from many disease like; fatty, diabetics…. as human saying “prevention is better than cure”.
However, others believe that the momey should invest in training top athletes to win major competition in fact having sucessful athletes can help your country become well- known, in fact famous athletes could make the wold pay attention to the country they come from.
From my own perspective the governments should spend the money to encourage people practicing sports regurlaly because it bring about much usefull for everyone from everywhere in contry from youngs to olds but one person.
-----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
Trần Thị Hiền lớp E_49
Em nộp bài writing chị nhé! Chúc chị cuối tuần vui vẻ ạ!


TOPIC: Some people believe it is better for governments to spend any available money for sports on providing facilities for the general population. others believe that instead they should invest in training top athletes to win major competitions.
Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.



There is no denying that everything has more than one face and the way how the government spend on money to development sport is no exception. The problem are some people believe it is better for the governments to spend any available money for sport on provinding facilities for the generral population. Others believe that instead they should invest in training top athetes to win major competitions.
At the opinon of the fist one we can clearly see that when the governments uses money for sports in general that means they are improving their people’s heath because doing sport can prevent people from becoming overweight, moreover practice sport can help people stronger and stay away from many disease like; fatty, diabetics…. as human saying “prevention is better than cure”.
However, others believe that the momey should invest in training top athletes to win major competition in fact having sucessful athletes can help your country become well- known, in fact famous athletes could make the wold pay attention to the country they come from.
From my own perspective the governments should spend the money to encourage people practicing sports regurlaly because it bring about much usefull for everyone from everywhere in contry from youngs to olds but one person.