Lớp học tiếng Anh cô giáo PHƯƠNG THÙY (cô Thùy_ED Lò Đúc) - Lớp học TA lâu đời nhất trên TTVNOL từ 2

Em thuha E45 nộp bài ah.chuc chi cuối tuần vui ve.hihiih
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} [FONT=&quot]Topic 54: Environmental problems are serious in many countries. It means that the only possible way to protect the environment is at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree on this hypothesis?[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Along with the development of society, more and more problems are brought to our attention, one of which is that the alarming of environmental problems. [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Climate change is a phenomenon affecting all people in all walks of life, from individual citizens to whole countries. Although a few environmental laws were established by some individual countries to try and stop these negative effects, environment pollution is still in the dangerous problems. I do strongly believe that protecting environment is the main obligations of all countries throughout the world.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I would like to present two explanations to confirm that I am right[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. Environmental pollution is considered as the global warning. Once the environmental catastrophe happens, it will impact on not only the host countries but also their neighbor countries. For example, as the earthquake and tsunami disasters in Japan, the radioactive substances have spread to some Asian countries that lead to the anxiety of Japanese and Asian people. In ad***ion, environmental protection is a large scale global issue, there is no individual country can independently solve this problem. Nowadays, the green house effect or global warming causes to serious problems. The more disasters occur, the more challenges people face to[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Furthermore, environmental protections at the international level can apply the higher achievement in solving global warming. If all countries follow the international laws about protecting environment by limiting the fuel emission to the air and ensuring large industries from dumping pollution into plants or water, the environment can be recovered. Furthermore, when the powerful countries make efforts to protect environment, they will motivate other countries to imitate them. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that [/FONT][FONT=&quot]environment[/FONT][FONT=&quot] pollutions are affecting not only individual but also entire countries all over the world. I concede that the cooperation between different countries can protect the environment and bequeath the better global for descendants. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]

Chị nói thế làm e ngượng. Mà e nhớ nhầm là e đọc bài của lớp E48 từ mail chứ ko pai từ wen []
-----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------

A từ bé đến h chưa bít ko ngủ ngon là j

E Hương Giang E45- nhóm 4- nộp bài chị nhé!
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} Topic 65: Good facilities can be found in cities but not in the countryside. Therefore, new doctors and teachers should be sent to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} As society develops, people are attaching much importance to their working con***ions. Doctors and teachers graduating freshly with a degree want to work in large city because good facilities can be found in urban areas but not in the rural areas. That leads to the lack of staff in education and health system in countryside. To improve this, some suggest that new doctors and teachers should be assigned with tasks in the countryside, but not in urban areas. There are some strong arguments for this suggested solution.
The first reason can be seen by every person is that big hospitals, health centers and schools equipped with high technologies and good facilities are usually located in urban areas whereas there are a lack of facilities in clinic and schools in rural areas. This fact leads to the same psychology of new doctors and teachers who have just graduated. They try to find a job in big cities because they think that they don’t have chance to improve their working skills in countryside. As a result, there is critical competition to have a job in clinics and schools in urban areas and many people have to give up their dream job. Otherwise, there are many opportunities in rural areas. In fact, working in rural areas enables them to enrich work experience within the shortest possible period of time. Facility shortage to many doctors in the countryside is an opportunity instead of a challenge. They are in a position to rely more on clinical skills than on sophisticated equipment. For teachers, they have to research to find out effective teaching method without teaching aids so they can improve their skills.
It might also be noted that the imbalance of resource and staff has chronic effects on the well-being of rural people. Lack of education or medication has made them among the most disadvantaged in a country. There is a growing gap between urban and rural areas. The temporary solution is that new doctors and teachers just graduated are sent to rural areas. They are factors to change living and health con***ions. Moreover, governments invest huge amount of money in rural areas to improve infrastructure and facilities there. Governments also have many policies to encourage doctors and teachers to work in countryside so that in my opinion, it’s good con***ion for them to promote their job.
Despite of those benefit, the place of work should be chosen by doctors or teachers themselves and compulsory assortment is not justifiable. We can’t force them to work in a place where they don’t like because it may be bring opposed result. Inspire, government have to give special treatment policy to people volunteering to work in rural areas. They deserve a better pay as a recognition of their contribution and also as an incentive.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that working in rural areas with new doctors and teachers is not only benefit for society but also a good opportunity to develop their job and their working skills

em hồng nhung-E45-GROUP 4-TOPIC 65
[FONT=.VnTime][/FONT]<P style=[/IMG]Along with the deverlopment of society, remarkable changes have place in the cities andcontryside specifically as there are good facilities can be found in the cities but not in the contryside so new doctor and teacher must go into the countryside .from my own perpective, we should analyze this issue from different side .A sizable percentage of people assert is that not only many hoppital , clinic and school are understaffed in rural areas but also the infrastructute less than the city.the imbalance between resources , staff and material is to influence people`s live here. i , personally , stand on the side of the advocates with an undeniable truth .lack of education or medication has made them don`t have the opportunity and con***ions for comprehensive development.allcating new doctors and teachers to those areas can at least provide a temporary and solving for fill the gaps doctors and teachers by the graduates from medical school and normal college.the second thing that must be taken into condideration is that doctors and teachers thinks that working con***ions in the city will help them to learn more and meet individual needs.but working in the contryside with their shortages of material to think and practice more instead off being with machinery that make them more experienced.instead of mordern city must have good facilities, good education, but in anywhere. Including in rural areas should enjoy these right. We encourage those in the case off voluntary work in rural area and should not agree to the doctors and teachers have the freedom to work because of personal.
From what has been discussed above, i think the correct attitude is that we should have need a new perspective with this problem.working in the contryside is a chance for them to learn more skills as well as balancing work between urban and rural

Nguyễn Công Tiến E45

Topic 58: Many people believe that the human society has developed into a throw-away society, which is filled with plastic bags and rubbish. What are the causes and solutions?

In recent years, the society is developing more and more at a rapid rate. There has been a perception that the human society has changed into a throw-away society. Actually, I can’t imagine when I have to live with a great deal of garbage around. Wastes can make our life worse and more terrible. I think that there are numerous causes of this problem and suggesting some solutions is the goal of this article.
The first reason that can be seen by every person is the explosion of population. As a result, the consumption of goods, foods and natural resources has increased with a surprisingly pace. In ad***ion, many people are becoming less responsible and easily influenced by bad behavior such as throwing garbage without permission of government, disposing of wastes whenever and wherever they consider convenient.
The second thing that must be taken into consideration is that the policy of government isn’t appropriate. The fine level isn’t enough for citizens to comply with the rules of the government. In some developing countries such as Singapore, if you threw away wastes without regulations, you would be fined a lot of money. It’ll make people more responsible with the envirionment.
Based on the above reasons, the best approach to address waste issues is simply to minimise its generation. It is primarily because the more waste people produce, the more waste they have to cope with.Scientists have developed more effective technologies in waste treatment. As time goesby, more and more peopleput high priority on the protection of environment for ahealthier life.Ad***ionally, laws should be set outto regulate corporation behaviour and make their operation environmentally friendly.
*****m up, people produce huge amount of garbage and the environment is seriously polluted because of lack of financial resources, sense of responsibility. But the world will not turn into a “throw away” society if people put in sufficient efforts to protect our environment.

Em Đức Khánh - E45 nộp bài . Nhóm 2, topic 57
Water resources around the world are falling deficient. Analyse the possible reasons and provide your suggestions

Water is a costly resource of peoples and living creature on the Earth. Everyone knows that approximately two thirds of the Earth surface is full with water. However, some countries over the word are facing with the water shortages. These problems can be explained by some following reasons.

Firstly, most of peoples do not have clearly knowledge about the value of water. Although water occuply a larger rate of the planet surface, the great part is salt water. The amount of freshwater in rivers, lakes, springs etc... is about two percents of them. Meanwhile many people see water as an infinite resource. Hence, the uncontrolled use of water is ordinary, this reason tend to the exhaustion of this valuable resource.
Secondly, the increasing of the population and economy of the world are other courses to reduce the volume of water. Rapid population growth brought about improving the water requirements. Not only for peoples, a huge amount of water available for manufacture, farming and others, especially is food and beverages companies. In mechanical engineering, a larger amount of water is provided for cooling components of the machines. Many water resources are not returnable for other purposes.
And the last, the environment changes have several impacts on the quantity of water over the world. The weather is warming; desert land is extending; and the sea level is rising in recent years. Therefore, the total of fresh water from iceberg in Antarctic, Arctic poles and snow ice in high mountain peak are reducing with every passing day.

As noted above, the steady loss of water is attributable to inappropriate usage, population growth and pollution. To maintain the levels of water shortages over the word, environmental organizes should have many measures to reduce the unhindered usage of peoples and industrial companies, propaganda campaigns about the valuable of water resources; actions to save water and protect the worldwide environment.

Cháu Thanh Hằng E 45


Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} Topic 69: Do you think it is better to send criminals to jail or let them receive education or job training?

In our time and age, much debate has taken place about whether sending criminals to jail or letting them receive education or job training. However, there is a mounting concern in these years that imprisonment is a less effective type of punishment, and some possibilities seem to promise more satisfying outcomes. I strongly hold the view that we should give education or job training to prisoners because of the following reasons.

We cannot forget a universal truth that education is of fundamental importance to rehabilitating a person who commits a crime. First of all, it changes delinquent attitudes toward society and family, a prerequisite to their reintegration into the community. Meantime, it allows them to keep in touch with the community, an opportunity that prisoners are normally deprived of. With the imprisonment time, they lose confidence and the ability to accustom to ordinary life outside. Therefore, the risk of re-offending is higher. As well as these, by receiving education in a proper learning environment, prisoners have lower chance of reinforcing each other’s antisocial and criminal behaviors in group situations.
Another reason why I prefer the argument is that, similar to education, work is one of the crucial important interventions in corrections, whether it takes the form of work release or vocational training. As a matter of fact, money is the main incentive of many crimes, such as shoplifting, robbery, burglary, and so forth. Obviously, job training enables prisoners to acquire earning capacity and improve job skills. By this they can become productive members of society and have the opportunity to behave normally towards family or occupation or society.
Everything has a good side and a bad side, to those habitual criminals, who have committed crimes repeatedly and show
little respect for the legal system, education and job training might not make any significant difference. Their behaviors and thoughts are deeply ingrained and unbending,in which circumstance imprisonment is the best way of keeping them from being perpetrators. Meanwhile, imprisonment has deterrent effects and can deter potential offenders from becoming actual offenders.
From what has been discussing above, I think the correct attitude is that the result of imprisonment can be mixed in many different suitable way. Education and vocational training should be carried out to those who committed less serious crimes, preventing them from becoming re-offenders after release and give them a hand to reorganize their lives.







-----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------
Cháu Thanh Hằng E 45


Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} Topic 69: Do you think it is better to send criminals to jail or let them receive education or job training?

In our time and age, much debate has taken place about whether sending criminals to jail or letting them receive education or job training. However, there is a mounting concern in these years that imprisonment is a less effective type of punishment, and some possibilities seem to promise more satisfying outcomes. I strongly hold the view that we should give education or job training to prisoners because of the following reasons.

We cannot forget a universal truth that education is of fundamental importance to rehabilitating a person who commits a crime. First of all, it changes delinquent attitudes toward society and family, a prerequisite to their reintegration into the community. Meantime, it allows them to keep in touch with the community, an opportunity that prisoners are normally deprived of. With the imprisonment time, they lose confidence and the ability to accustom to ordinary life outside. Therefore, the risk of re-offending is higher. As well as these, by receiving education in a proper learning environment, prisoners have lower chance of reinforcing each other’s antisocial and criminal behaviors in group situations.
Another reason why I prefer the argument is that, similar to education, work is one of the crucial important interventions in corrections, whether it takes the form of work release or vocational training. As a matter of fact, money is the main incentive of many crimes, such as shoplifting, robbery, burglary, and so forth. Obviously, job training enables prisoners to acquire earning capacity and improve job skills. By this they can become productive members of society and have the opportunity to behave normally towards family or occupation or society.
Everything has a good side and a bad side, to those habitual criminals, who have committed crimes repeatedly and show
little respect for the legal system, education and job training might not make any significant difference. Their behaviors and thoughts are deeply ingrained and unbending,in which circumstance imprisonment is the best way of keeping them from being perpetrators. Meanwhile, imprisonment has deterrent effects and can deter potential offenders from becoming actual offenders.
From what has been discussing above, I think the correct attitude is that the result of imprisonment can be mixed in many different suitable way. Education and vocational training should be carried out to those who committed less serious crimes, preventing them from becoming re-offenders after release and give them a hand to reorganize their lives.

Em Diêm Thùy Dương_E45_Group 4
Topic 65: Good facilities can be found in cities but not in the countryside. Therefore, new doctors and teachers should be sent to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
<FONT size=3 face=[/IMG]
Along with the development of society, more and more problems are brought to our attention, one of which is that good facilities have been found as a common sight in the city but not in the rural. For this reason, some people hold the opinion that new doctors and teachers should be allocated with tasks in the countryside. There are some strong arguments for this suggested solution.
Firstly, from my own perspective, new doctors and teachers should be sent to the countryside due to the imbalance of resources and staff between city and the counterparts in the city. In recent years, there are a number of students decided to live and work in the city instead of come back to their rural native land after gruaduated. Therefore, clinics, hospitals and shools are remarkably overstaffed in the city, compared with their understaffed in rural areas. Moreover, assigning doctors and teachers to the rural area can also help to solve weakness as well as improve living standard due to the lack of facilities for health and education in contry.
There is another factor that deserves some words here. Working in rural is a good chance for the doctors and teachers that graduate freshly from their university in the sake of enrich woking experience with fewer stresses and pressure compard to working in the city. They must work hardlier by themselves because of lack of good facilities. Thus, they will improve their skills, such as teachking skills, examining skill,…within the shortest possi le period of time.
There is a further more subtle point we must consider. Allocating new teachers and doctors to rural is not justifiable. Everyone has their own desire about where they will work at.Working in rural, people must deal with some issues, such as bad working con***ion, bad transportation system,,and lower living standard,…for this reason, those graduates who volunteer to work in rural should get a higher salary as a recognition of their contribution as well as an incentive.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that taking rural employment can benefit new doctors and teachers, like accumulating highly valuabe experience and solving shortage of country. Nevertheless, those graduates should have own right to choose where they will work in, instead of compulsory assignment.


-----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------
Em Diêm Thùy Dương_E45_Group4
Topic 65: Good facilities can be found in cities but not in the countryside. Therefore, new doctors and teachers should be sent to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Along with the development of society, more and more problems are brought to our attention, one of which is that good facilities have been found as a common sight in the city but not in the rural. For this reason, some people hold the opinion that new doctors and teachers should be allocated with tasks in the countryside. There are some strong arguments for this suggested solution.
Firstly, from my own perspective, new doctors and teachers should be sent to the countryside due to the imbalance of resources and staff between city and the counterparts in the city. In recent years, there are a number of students decided to live and work in the city instead of come back to their rural native land after gruaduated. Therefore, clinics, hospitals and shools are remarkably overstaffed in the city, compared with their understaffed in rural areas. Moreover, assigning doctors and teachers to the rural area can also help to solve weakness as well as improve living standard due to the lack of facilities for health and education in contry.
There is another factor that deserves some words here. Working in rural is a good chance for the doctors and teachers that graduate freshly from their university in the sake of enrich woking experience with fewer stresses and pressure compard to working in the city. They must work hardlier by themselves because of lack of good facilities. Thus, they will improve their skills, such as teachking skills, examining skill,…within the shortest possi le period of time.
There is a further more subtle point we must consider. Allocating new teachers and doctors to rural is not justifiable. Everyone has their own desire about where they will work at.Working in rural, people must deal with some issues, such as bad working con***ion, bad transportation system,,and lower living standard,…for this reason, those graduates who volunteer to work in rural should get a higher salary as a recognition of their contribution as well as an incentive.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that taking rural employment can benefit new doctors and teachers, like accumulating highly valuabe experience and solving shortage of country. Nevertheless, those graduates should have own right to choose where they will work in, instead of compulsory assignment.
-----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------
em Diêm Thùy Dương_E45_group4

Topic 65: Good facilities can be found in cities but not in the countryside. Therefore, new doctors and teachers should be sent to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Along with the development of society, more and more problems are brought to our attention, one of which is that good facilities have been found as a common sight in the city but not in the rural. For this reason, some people hold the opinion that new doctors and teachers should be allocated with tasks in the countryside. There are some strong arguments for this suggested solution.
Firstly, from my own perspective, new doctors and teachers should be sent to the countryside due to the imbalance of resources and staff between city and the counterparts in the city. In recent years, there are a number of students decided to live and work in the city instead of come back to their rural native land after gruaduated. Therefore, clinics, hospitals and shools are remarkably overstaffed in the city, compared with their understaffed in rural areas. Moreover, assigning doctors and teachers to the rural area can also help to solve weakness as well as improve living standard due to the lack of facilities for health and education in contry.
There is another factor that deserves some words here. Working in rural is a good chance for the doctors and teachers that graduate freshly from their university in the sake of enrich woking experience with fewer stresses and pressure compard to working in the city. They must work hardlier by themselves because of lack of good facilities. Thus, they will improve their skills, such as teachking skills, examining skill,…within the shortest possi le period of time.
There is a further more subtle point we must consider. Allocating new teachers and doctors to rural is not justifiable. Everyone has their own desire about where they will work at.Working in rural, people must deal with some issues, such as bad working con***ion, bad transportation system,,and lower living standard,…for this reason, those graduates who volunteer to work in rural should get a higher salary as a recognition of their contribution as well as an incentive.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that taking rural employment can benefit new doctors and teachers, like accumulating highly valuabe experience and solving shortage of country. Nevertheless, those graduates should have own right to choose where they will work in, instead of compulsory assignment.
-----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------
Em Diêm Thùy Dương_E45_group4

Topic 65: Good facilities can be found in cities but not in the countryside. Therefore, new doctors and teachers should be sent to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?


Along with the development of society, more and more problems are brought to our attention, one of which is that good facilities have been found as a common sight in the city but not in the rural. For this reason, some people hold the opinion that new doctors and teachers should be allocated with tasks in the countryside. There are some strong arguments for this suggested solution.
Firstly, from my own perspective, new doctors and teachers should be sent to the countryside due to the imbalance of resources and staff between city and the counterparts in the city. In recent years, there are a number of students decided to live and work in the city instead of come back to their rural native land after gruaduated. Therefore, clinics, hospitals and shools are remarkably overstaffed in the city, compared with their understaffed in rural areas. Moreover, assigning doctors and teachers to the rural area can also help to solve weakness as well as improve living standard due to the lack of facilities for health and education in contry.
There is another factor that deserves some words here. Working in rural is a good chance for the doctors and teachers that graduate freshly from their university in the sake of enrich woking experience with fewer stresses and pressure compard to working in the city. They must work hardlier by themselves because of lack of good facilities. Thus, they will improve their skills, such as teachking skills, examining skill,…within the shortest possi le period of time.
There is a further more subtle point we must consider. Allocating new teachers and doctors to rural is not justifiable. Everyone has their own desire about where they will work at.Working in rural, people must deal with some issues, such as bad working con***ion, bad transportation system,,and lower living standard,…for this reason, those graduates who volunteer to work in rural should get a higher salary as a recognition of their contribution as well as an incentive.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that taking rural employment can benefit new doctors and teachers, like accumulating highly valuabe experience and solving shortage of country. Nevertheless, those graduates should have own right to choose where they will work in, instead of compulsory assignment.

Ôi sự trả thù ngọt ngào, khổ thân E 48 rồi hahaha

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} Em Diêm Thùy Dương_E45_group4

Topic 65: Good facilities can be found in cities but not in the countryside. Therefore, new doctors and teachers should be sent to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Along with the development of society, more and more problems are brought to our attention, one of which is that good facilities have been found as a common sight in the city but not in the rural. For this reason, some people hold the opinion that new doctors and teachers should be allocated with tasks in the countryside. There are some strong arguments for this suggested solution.
Firstly, from my own perspective, new doctors and teachers should be sent to the countryside due to the imbalance of resources and staff between city and the counterparts in the city. In recent years, there are a number of students decided to live and work in the city instead of come back to their rural native land after gruaduated. Therefore, clinics, hospitals and shools are remarkably overstaffed in the city, compared with their understaffed in rural areas. Moreover, assigning doctors and teachers to the rural area can also help to solve weakness as well as improve living standard due to the lack of facilities for health and education in contry.
There is another factor that deserves some words here. Working in rural is a good chance for the doctors and teachers that graduate freshly from their university in the sake of enrich woking experience with fewer stresses and pressure compard to working in the city. They must work hardlier by themselves because of lack of good facilities. Thus, they will improve their skills, such as teachking skills, examining skill,…within the shortest possi le period of time.
There is a further more subtle point we must consider. Allocating new teachers and doctors to rural is not justifiable. Everyone has their own desire about where they will work at.Working in rural, people must deal with some issues, such as bad working con***ion, bad transportation system,,and lower living standard,…for this reason, those graduates who volunteer to work in rural should get a higher salary as a recognition of their contribution as well as an incentive.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that taking rural employment can benefit new doctors and teachers, like accumulating highly valuabe experience and solving shortage of country. Nevertheless, those graduates should have own right to choose where they will work in, instead of compulsory assignment.