Lớp học tiếng Anh cô giáo PHƯƠNG THÙY (cô Thùy_ED Lò Đúc) - Lớp học TA lâu đời nhất trên TTVNOL từ 2

30k vở voca bạn ơi , ko phải 30k 1 bài , viết thế tưởng cô giáo chặt chém hs . Bạn mà làm 1 nửa thì 15k nhé

có vụ 15k nữa hả? giờ mới nghe luôn

ủa, hôm đầu sếp bảo 1 bài 30k mà, hay mình nghe lộn tiêm nhỉ !
mà cái vụ 15k thì hơi bị mới đây ^^!

Em Vân nộp bài Writing task 1



The table illustrates the percentage use of four different fuel types in five European countries in 2001. Four fuel types (include nuclear, coal and lignite, petroleum products, hydro and wind, and others) are used to instead of electricity.

The percentage use of nuclear is highest in Belgium (58%) and next in Sweden (45%). In contrast, people do not use nuclear to generate electricity in Italy. In ad***ion, coal and lignite - two fuels is used mostly in Germany with the corresponding percentage is 50% but in Sweden, the percentage use is only 1%. Beside, petroleum is also one fuel type but not popular used in Euro countries, the highest percentage use of petroleum products is 27% in Italy. Germany, Britain, Sweden and Belgium use less with the percentage use is 1% and 2%, respectively. Two different fuels are hydro and wind. They are used most popular in Sweden, approximately 49% and next in Italy, approximately 20%. The percentage use of hydro and wind in Germany, Britain and Belgium is 6%, 2% and 2%, respectively. Moreover, European countries use other fuels to instead of electricity, in which the percentage use of them in Italy, Sweden and Britain occupy more or nearly 40%, also Germany and Belgium use them on average (13% and 26%).

Overall, the percentage use of other fuels to generate electricity is the most same between European countries and vice-versa, fuel type used less is petroleum in 2001.

Ừ, em gửi đi chị chữa cho em nhé [r2)]
Hôm nay mình chữa gần hết bài ol của lớp E48 thì bị quấy rối, nhầm, quấy nhiễu nên mai mình làm nốt mình gửi cả thể luôn nhá [r32)]
-----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------
Này, các đồng chí E53, hum nay khai giảng có ai thấy mình nói nhanh quá/ chậm quá ko? thật lòng nha
-----------------------------Tự động gộp Reply ---------------------------

Thế nèo đây chàng ơi, thế có học hem

em thấy chị Thuỳ nói lúc nào cũng ok hehe [ that long nha chị ]

.......................

Một đồng chí E53 xin phát biểu ý kiến ạ:

Dear Mrs. Chubby,
Before the kick-off meeting today, i thought this class would be the dream world for me after every working days with beautiful girls, funs, gossiping, etc... all the time
But you have shown me the real challenge









































But I LOVE IT - my dream world , i love what u've done so far
I AM READY

Regards,
Mr. anonymous

C Thùy ạ, c check mail đi nhá, hic em phải đi taxi về đấy, hic cứ thứ 4 hàng tuần em lại phải taxi rồi, cơ mà hôm nay e hơi bị hoang mang á. nhìn 3 quyển sách và nhìn các bạn em kiểu như bị "sợ hãi" á c
p/s: hí hí c nói thế là ok rồi, em nghe dc

Em Trọng gửi bài Writing task 2 chị ui. Em còn nợ chị kha khá bài, em sẽ cố gắng hoàn tất trong tuần này chị à!


Topic: Supermarkets should only sell food produced from their own country rather than import from overseas. What are your opinions on this?

Nowadays, a sizeable percentage of people advocates that stores all should only give their customers the domestic foodstuffs rather than foreign ones. Others believe that it is not really important. For the following reasons, which I will mention below, I will analyze both these points and present my view.

From the one side, selling local foods brings many benefits. First of all, it will give incentives to indigenous companies to enhance their yield. When a majority of people have demand to use local vegetables, meat, etc…, it means that the companies will have a big and potential market to consume products which they offer. Second of all, standards of safe food will force producers who always desire to export products oversea must change the production process properly to compete with many companies all over the world. This reason explains why aliments from Japanese, American or Australian companies (i.e. Kobe steak, Australian steak or American cherry) have a good prestige in consumers’ mind across the world.

From the other side, buying oversea foods have some advantages too. For instance, I will most likely have a choice to enjoy the high quality foods if I have enough money to buy. Moreover, importing oversea foods is a solution to restrict exclusivity in food industry. This means that with the competition from foreign groups in indigenous market will be pressure to force local companies abide by customers’ right. They must supply better and safer aliments which would not happen if consumers are forced to use their products.

From my own perspective, although we should properly protect the indigenous market by many appropriate policies in particular period like subsiding from government or building tariff with eats imported from oversea, we also encourage the appearance of foreign foodstuffs to meet the demand of internal market and push indirectly the development of inland food industry.

Based on the above discussion and analysis, we can see that each of options has the specific advantages. The most important solution is that, authorities must protect food industry properly without damaging the trade treaties which we joined.