Tiềm Lực Tên Lửa của Nga

Putin lại có đề xuất bất ngờ về lá chắn tên lửa với Bush

[b[Trong cuộc gặp không chính thức với ông chủ Nhà Trắng tại bang Maine, nhà lãnh đạo Nga Vladimir Putin đã một lần nữa phản đối kế hoạch phòng thủ tên lửa của Mỹ dự định đặt tại châu Âu, bất ngờ đề xuất hệ thống nên được mở rộng và triển khai chủ yếu tại Nga.[/b]
Cuộc hội đàm không chính thức kéo dài 2 ngày tại bờ biển Maine nhằm mục đích phục hồi mối quan hệ tốt đẹp trước đây giữa 2 nhà lãnh đạo và làm dịu bớt căng thẳng khi mối quan hệ Nga-Mỹ đang rơi vào tình trạng xấu nhất kể từ sau chiến tranh lạnh.
Sau những buổi đi câu và những bữa tiệc chiêu đãi với tôm hùm, Tổng thống Mỹ Bush và người đồng nhiệm Putin đã chuyển chủ đề sang các vấn đề ngoại giao quan trọng nhưng không đạt được đột phá.

Chủ đề duy nhất mà hai bên có tiếng nói chung là chương trình hạt nhân của Iran. Hai ông tuyên bố tiếp tục hợp tác thành công trong việc giải quyết chương trình hạt nhân của Iran thông qua Liên Hợp Quốc. Tuy nhiên, không có dấu hiệu nào cho thấy, nhà lãnh đạo Nga có cùng quan điểm với phương Tây về việc trao quyền độc lập cho Kosovo của Serbia.

Về kế hoạch tên lửa của Mỹ tại đông Âu, ông Putin đã đưa ra một loạt các đề xuất mới bao gồm việc hiện đại hoá trạm radar ở Azerbaijan mà ông từng gợi ý để thay thế cho hệ thống tại Cộng hoà Czech và Ba Lan. Tổng thống Putin cũng đề nghị xây dựng một trạm radar mới ở miền nam nước Nga.

Ngoài ra, ông Putin còn đề xuất mở rộng thảo luận về hệ thống phòng thủ tên lửa với các quốc gia châu Âu khác trong khuôn khổ hội đồng Nga-Nato và thiết lập các trung tâm phóng tên lửa cảnh báo sớm, từng được Matxcơva và Brussels chấp thuận.

Tổng thống Mỹ và các phụ tá của ông đều chưa có phản ứng dứt khoát với đề xuất bất ngờ từ phía ông Putin. Ông Bush gọi đề xuất mới của Putin là ?orất đổi mới? và đáng để nghiên cứu. Tuy nhiên, ông chủ Nhà Trắng khẳng định hệ thống phòng thủ tên lửa phải được đặt tại đông Âu, mặc cho sự phản đối rất quyết liệt từ phía Nga.

VTH
Theo BBC
http://www1.dantri.com.vn/Thegioi/2007/7/185874.vip

Strategic submarine of new generation to be finished soon in Russia
According to shipbuilding.ru, a joint project of the Agency of Informational Resources and the Krylov Research Institute, on April, 15 Sevmash Shipyard will take out of the slipway the new generation strategic submarine Yuri Dolgoruky. Two more subs of the same 955 project Borei are at different stages of construction. The new subs will carry a new generation intercontinental missile Bulava (mace). According to the Russian designers it will take the foreign competitors 10-15 years to make something similar with close characteristics. It is true that the process of creating this missile is experiencing certain difficulties, which is willingly quoted by the foreign observers. However, even with all failures the no-match weapon is likely to be created in no-match short terms.
The last (third) test of Bulava held on December, 24 was not fulfilled completely. The missile burst over the Sea of Okhotsk within a reasonably short distance before the target. According to the official sources a technical malfunction occurred in the 3rd stage engine and this is why the missile could not follow trajectory, whereby it should have flown up to the test filed Kura in Kamchatka peninsula. The first and second stages of Bulava "worked perfectly", but there were "certain drawbacks" in the third stage.
The missile started from the test submarine Dmitry Donskoj, which was in a surface position in the White Sea. On October, 25 Bulava was launched from the same sub in a submarine position. The missile flew about 200 seconds and started to change the trajectory, after which the alarm system commanded self-destruction. At that time the reaction of the Russian official institutions was surprisingly calm. There were even unofficial phrases that the launch is regarded as successful. The first out of three failures took place on Sept, 7. All above gave enough ground for the ill-wishers to speak about certain regularity: in two launchings from a submarine position (on September, 7th and on October, 25th, 2006) the rocket fell in the first minutes of the flight, whereas in two other from a surface position (on September, 27th 2005 and on December, 24th, 2006) the problems occurred in the third stage.
It turns out that journalists and specialists view the same point differently. According to the lower rank engineers (probably the most unbiased source) such failures may not be regarded as a mistake of the subs?T crew or a serious failure of the machinery. This is a standard test work and certain deviations may be even forecasted. According to one of the former senior officers of the Central Military-Naval Test Filed near Severodvnsk while the individual units of a complex are adjusted to one another such events can be regarded as ?oworking procedurê?. The average historical number of failures of this level according to the statistics is vividly lower in Russia (USSR) than in the USA. The malfunctions of Bulava did not reach ?oa level of concern? at all. Maximum what the skeptics can state at the moment is that the designers failed with the claimed ?ostainless? tests.
It is out of the question to expect any changes of the attitude on the official level. Topol (successfully implemented ground based version of the missile) and Bulava programs will not be reconsidered. It goes without saying. For example, the head of the Russian Space Agency Anatoly Perminov considers that "nothing terrible took place", as it was only the fifth test of Bulava and with each launch of the missile its characteristic improve. Besides, to commission a missile complex, according to Mr. Perminov, 12-14 start-up tests are required on average.
The reason for such a hurry with the development of the new missile is that the designers try to save the costs of commissioning the missile. According to the head of the Moscow Institute of Teplotechnika (MIT) Yuri Solomonov the unification of the ground based missiles gave the economization of about 30%, the unification with the naval missiles will further cut costs. In this case the designers have full understanding from the government and the military-industrial commission. They agreed that Bulava must be made at the same plants as Topol-M (Votkinsky Plant). When the manufacturer got the first orders for test Bulavas in 2004-2005 its costs immediately went down
According to the different open sources the new hard fueled Bulava is 11,5m long (without warhead, with ?" 12.1m), its maximum diameter is 2m, launching weight - 36,8t. The length of the container is 12.1m, diameter - 2,1m. The first 3.8m long stage weighs 18.6t. The information on the second and third stages has not been released. All stages have the diameter of 3m. The payload is 1150kg, the declared number of warheads ?" 6, which have the accuracy of 350m. According to other sources there are 10 warheads and the range is at least 8000km. It is certain that the missile has the hypersonic maneuvering warheads capable of changing the trajectory vertically and horizontally, which can penetrate any existing and perspective strategic defense system.
The experts called this new trajectory ?oquasi-ballistic?. According to the general-colonel Nikolay Solovtsov, the commander of the Russian Strategic Missile Forces, creation of the rockets with changeable trajectory and hypersonic speed is a matter of the next couple of years, not a long-term future. But even today Russian missiles now on duty can hit any target anywhere in the world. The factor of technical readiness of these weapons is 0,97-0,98. It means that out of each hundred 97-98 missiles can immediately and successfully fulfill a mission. As an example the commander referred to the last year''s exercise, when the missile "Topol" confirmed combat efficiency after a 90-kilometer raid. However, Russian designer improve not only the strike power.
In 2006 t he Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences held the meeting dedicated to the report ?oHow to pass through the Anti Missile Defensê?. The speakers arrived at the conclusion that it is technically possible to guarantee the penetration through the strategic missile defense. The main report was presented by the designer of the Topol and Bulava Yuri Solomonov. He pointed out the changing policy of the development of the strategic forces. In the cold war era 40% of the strike efficiency accounted for the informational support, 60% for the strike power. Today the 40:60 ratio is counted vise versa and the trend continues
This is way the designers try to hide the launchings and increase the survivability of the missiles along the whole route. The reason why Russia invests in the ground mobile Topols and naval Bulavas is because the US plans to start from 2009 the systems of space monitoring of earth. Mobile complexes could guarantee 80% launchings. According to Yuri Solomonov the tests demonstrated that Topols?T launchings remained unnoticed. Also the new on-board equipment of Topols is highly resistant to the interception means, including nuclear and laser. Today having shorted the take off stage, the designers are working on reducing the visibility of the missile at the stage of splitting the warheads and making it more difficult to tell the false warheads from the real ones. According to Mr. Solomonov the unified missiles Topol-M and Bulava shall be the core of the Russian nuclear deterrence till 2040-2045 and keeping in mind the modernization potential probably till 2050-2060. Yuri Solomonov publicly wanted to forecast that the nearest foreign matches will appear in 15-20 years.

Russia to deploy fixed-site Topol-M ICBMs by 2010 -SMF cmdr
12:22 | 08/ 05/ 2007

MOSCOW REGION, May 8 (RIA Novosti) - Russia''s Strategic Missile Forces will complete the deployment of silo-based Topol-M ICBMs by 2010, the SMF commander in chief said Tuesday.
"Alongside the deployment of Topol-M mobile complexes, we are planning to finalize the deployment of fixed-site Topol-M systems by 2010," Col. Gen. Nikolai Solovtsov said.
He said Monday the Topol-M system will be equipped with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV) in the next two or three years, adding the new system will help penetrate missile defenses more effectively.
His statement comes against the background of growing tensions between Moscow and the West regarding plans by the United States to deploy elements of its global antiballistic missile defense system in Central Europe.
Washington has insisted that placing missile shield components in Poland and the Czech Republic is aimed against possible nuclear strikes from rogue states, such as Iran and North Korea, whose controversial nuclear programs have caused international concerns. But Moscow, already unnerved by NATO expansion to former Warsaw Pact member states, has condemned the plans as a threat to national security and a destabilizing factor for Europe.
Gen. Solovtsov said the Strategic Missile Forces would factor in the new threats.
"If the U.S. proceeds with missile defense plans, despite serious opposition from people in Europe, the Strategic Missile Forces will manage to take adequate measures to counter threats to Russia," he said.
But a Russian senior military official said Monday Russia''s mid-tem military development program will not be reviewed despite U.S. plans to deploy a missile defense system in Central Europe.
"The Armed Forces development plan through 2010 was approved by the Russian president. It is being implemented and will not be amended," said Gen. Yury Baluyevsky, chief of the General Staff of Russia''s Armed Forces.
He said the plan could only be revised if drastic changes occur globally.
"Thus far no such changes have taken place," he said.
Gen. Baluyevsky also said Russia does not intend to use the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty to provide an asymmetric response to U.S. missile shield plans.
"If someone thinks Russia''s position on American missile defense and the CFE are linked, they are wrong," he told a briefing in Moscow.
He said Russia could respond with less expensive options, adding that the missile defense program was onerous even for the American budget.
He said Moscow will respond without fail if it sees missile defense as a threat to its national interests.
"Exactly what measures will be taken is a technical matter," he said.
Gen. Baluyevsky said should it break out, a new "Cold War" would set U.S.-Russian relations back 50 years, adding it is vital to prevent such a situation.

Nga ngố có khoảng gần 400 em black jack Tu160 đấy các bác ạ. Nếu Vịt nhà mình tậu được độ 3-5 em thì hay quá. Thằng Khựa mà ngo ngoe, bay 3 em sang shanghai thì nó chết tươi.

- em tuy là fan NGa nhưng nga ngố cũng chỉ có 17 con Tu-160 Blackjack đang active thôi ạ
link::http://warfare.ru/?lang=&catid=257&linkid=1620

Với tất cả sự tôn trọng , xin bạn PhuongAK dừng việc post những ý kiến kiểu như thế này được không? Cho iễn đàn bớt bừa bộn vướng víu ... Cảm ơn bạn đã giúp cho anh em có tiếng cười xả xì trét, nhưng cười mãi cũng nhàm, OK?

mà theo mấy bác nếu có chiến tranh hạt nhân thì chẳng lẽ thằng nào khai hoả tên lửa trc là thằng đó ăn àh???
Còn nếu mẽo và gấu nó phóng hết kho đạn hạt nhân của nó thì loài người bị tuyệt vong àh??hxhxh

Chắc chắn rồi. Mỹ phóng trước, Nga chết tiệt ngay không bắn được quả nào, thì Mỹ cũng vẫn chết, nhưng sau vài năm. Các hiệu ứng khí hậu sau khi một lượng lớn vũ khí hạt nhân nổ, sẽ giết cả thế giới. Bác ngó qua về mưa phóng xạ và mùa đông hạt nhân để xem xét khía cạnh này nhé!
Nhưng loài người chắc chết nhanh hơn, vì cả Nga và Mỹ đều không thể chết tiệt trước khi đánh trả được. Với thời gian gần 1 tiếng từ khi phóng đến khi đạn chạm mục tiêu, 2 bên còn làm được ối việc, kể cả phóng hết kho vũ khí của mình. Chưa tính các tầu ngầm chiếm lược đang ẩn đâu đó ngoài lãnh thổ!!!

Cả Ngố và Mẽo chẳng thằng nào chết trước cả. Những thằng nào nằm trên đường bay của tên lửa thì sẽ bị chết trước bởi không thằng nào muốn tên lửa đối phương bay vào lãnh thổ của mình rồi mới thịt. NMD của Mẽo cũng toàn tính toán để bắn nổ tên lửa ngoài biển đó thôi. May mà mình nằm xa hai anh này nên cũng sống sót thêm được vài phút nữa.