Tin Tình báo- Tin về tình hình quân sự ASEAN (P1)

Loại radar mà VN mua của Nga là loại ST-68U Tin Shield, được đánh giá là cũng khá hiện đại. Nó có tầm trinh sát tới 350km

Đây là ảnh của ST-68U

Đây là ảnh của ST-68U

Frictions between Japan and China surge
BY TIM JOHNSON
Knight Ridder Newspapers
TOKYO - Hardly a month goes by without new irritants in relations between Japan and China. Recent grievances range from a soccer riot and submarine intrusion to dominion over a lighthouse and the granting of a visa to an octogenarian.
The public mood in each country is souring toward the other, prompting some experts to wonder whether leaders will keep a lid on nationalistic tensions. Both countries are important to stability in Asia and the U.S. economy: Japan is the world''s second-largest economy, and China is a new power after two decades of fast growth.
It might seem that the two countries have little to complain about. Trade ties grow more robust each year. Last year, China (including Hong Kong) surpassed the United States as Japan''s top trading partner. Japan can cre*** its fragile economic recovery *****rging growth in China.
But the two nations compete for regional influence and reliable energy supplies. Political relations may be at their lowest point in decades as Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi''s government becomes more assertive toward China, ending a policy of seeking to avoid confrontation.
Japan and China haven''t held regular summit meetings since Koizumi came to office in 2001. Both sides keep putting off meetings, citing grievances.
"People on both sides see the other as potential adversaries," said Takashi Inoguchi, a political scientist at the University of Tokyo.
The latest conflict centers on five uninhabited isles, known by the Japanese as the Senkaku Islands and by the Chinese as the Diaoyu. The islands are in the East China Sea, 125 miles northeast of Taiwan, near a continental shelf containing pockets of natural gas.
Last week, Tokyo announced that the Japanese Coast Guard had assumed the maintenance of a private lighthouse on one of the islands, set up by a right-wing group in 1986 as a symbol of Japanese sovereignty.
China, which challenges Japan''s claim to the islands, accused Japan of a "severe provocation" and said the move was "illegal and invalid" and "absolutely unacceptable."
Flare-ups over the islands have occurred in the past, but the stakes are rising. The islands, also claimed by Taiwan, include 11,700 square miles of surrounding maritime territory, rich in fishing resources, natural gas reserves and sea lanes critical in the event of war.
Japan and China already were jockeying over an undersea natural gas field in an area of the East China Sea where both nations claim exclusive economic control.
In mid-2004, China built offshore drilling platforms in waters that both countries agree are under China''s control but within several miles of waters claimed by Japan.
Worried that Chinese drilling might suck up natural gas belonging to Japan, Tokyo''s trade ministry last month gave a preliminary green light to two Japanese companies to drill in the area as well.
A painful history underlies current problems between Japan and China. Japan occupied much of China in the 1930s and `40s, until the end of World War II, and Japanese soldiers committed atrocities and killed hundreds of thousands of civilians.
Newspapers regularly complain about Japan''s failure to clean up some 700,000 chemical weapon canisters left behind by its army in northeast China.
Chinese voice deep consternation over Koizumi''s annual visits to the Yasukuni shrine, which honors Japanese war dead, including war criminals. Beijing says it''s watching closely to see if he insists on going this year, the 60th anniversary of the end of World War II.
Relations have gone downhill following an ugly incident in Beijing last August. When a Chinese team lost an Asia Cup soccer match to a visiting Japanese team, police squads stood by as rampaging fans burned Japanese flags, taunted Japanese players and smashed a window of the Japanese ambassador''s car. The rioting trapped some 2,000 Japanese fans in the stadium.
Many Japanese feel that China''s leaders tolerate, or even foment, anti-Japanese sentiment as an outlet for frustrations as they crush political dissent.
On Nov. 10, Japan detected a Chinese submarine in its territorial waters and chased it away, drawing a belated and mild apology from Beijing. The intrusion was seen as a sign that China is projecting naval power deep into the Pacific Ocean at Japan''s expense.
"China''s military strategy has become even more assertive in the oceans," said Ikuo Kayahara, a former lieutenant general in Japan''s Self-Defense Forces, noting that he believes China wants control of waters as far as the mid-Pacific Ocean.
For its part, China reacted angrily in December when Tokyo granted a visa to an 82-year-old former president of Taiwan, Lee Teng-hui, to spend his year-end holidays in Japan. Chinese authorities view Lee, who was educated in Japan and has long ties to the nation, as an architect of Taiwan''s push for independence.
Last month, for the first time ever, the Japanese government named China as a security concern, along with North Korea.
Japan is discussing slashing its development aid to China, which has only recently dipped below $1 billion a year. Many Chinese view the aid as disguised wartime reparations for Japan''s occupation of China and see no reason for it to end.
For their part, some Japanese voice frustration that they should aid a rival country that put a man in space in 2003 and will host the Olympic Games in 2008.
"China can stand on its own two feet. They are not so weak that they need help from other countries," said Fumio Kyuma, a former national defense chief and current legislator from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party.
Some Japanese laud Koizumi''s more confrontational stance toward China as a sign of backbone. Others, especially in the business community, see it as lacking in long-term strategy and skill in dealing with China''s expansion.
"The idea of an Asian rival is so novel that Japan simply doesn''t know how to respond," said Kurt W. Radtke, an Asia-Pacific specialist at Waseda University in Tokyo. "There''s a sort of uncontrollable apprehension about a rising China."
---
â 2005, Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.

Frictions between Japan and China surge
BY TIM JOHNSON
Knight Ridder Newspapers
TOKYO - Hardly a month goes by without new irritants in relations between Japan and China. Recent grievances range from a soccer riot and submarine intrusion to dominion over a lighthouse and the granting of a visa to an octogenarian.
The public mood in each country is souring toward the other, prompting some experts to wonder whether leaders will keep a lid on nationalistic tensions. Both countries are important to stability in Asia and the U.S. economy: Japan is the world''s second-largest economy, and China is a new power after two decades of fast growth.
It might seem that the two countries have little to complain about. Trade ties grow more robust each year. Last year, China (including Hong Kong) surpassed the United States as Japan''s top trading partner. Japan can cre*** its fragile economic recovery *****rging growth in China.
But the two nations compete for regional influence and reliable energy supplies. Political relations may be at their lowest point in decades as Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi''s government becomes more assertive toward China, ending a policy of seeking to avoid confrontation.
Japan and China haven''t held regular summit meetings since Koizumi came to office in 2001. Both sides keep putting off meetings, citing grievances.
"People on both sides see the other as potential adversaries," said Takashi Inoguchi, a political scientist at the University of Tokyo.
The latest conflict centers on five uninhabited isles, known by the Japanese as the Senkaku Islands and by the Chinese as the Diaoyu. The islands are in the East China Sea, 125 miles northeast of Taiwan, near a continental shelf containing pockets of natural gas.
Last week, Tokyo announced that the Japanese Coast Guard had assumed the maintenance of a private lighthouse on one of the islands, set up by a right-wing group in 1986 as a symbol of Japanese sovereignty.
China, which challenges Japan''s claim to the islands, accused Japan of a "severe provocation" and said the move was "illegal and invalid" and "absolutely unacceptable."
Flare-ups over the islands have occurred in the past, but the stakes are rising. The islands, also claimed by Taiwan, include 11,700 square miles of surrounding maritime territory, rich in fishing resources, natural gas reserves and sea lanes critical in the event of war.
Japan and China already were jockeying over an undersea natural gas field in an area of the East China Sea where both nations claim exclusive economic control.
In mid-2004, China built offshore drilling platforms in waters that both countries agree are under China''s control but within several miles of waters claimed by Japan.
Worried that Chinese drilling might suck up natural gas belonging to Japan, Tokyo''s trade ministry last month gave a preliminary green light to two Japanese companies to drill in the area as well.
A painful history underlies current problems between Japan and China. Japan occupied much of China in the 1930s and `40s, until the end of World War II, and Japanese soldiers committed atrocities and killed hundreds of thousands of civilians.
Newspapers regularly complain about Japan''s failure to clean up some 700,000 chemical weapon canisters left behind by its army in northeast China.
Chinese voice deep consternation over Koizumi''s annual visits to the Yasukuni shrine, which honors Japanese war dead, including war criminals. Beijing says it''s watching closely to see if he insists on going this year, the 60th anniversary of the end of World War II.
Relations have gone downhill following an ugly incident in Beijing last August. When a Chinese team lost an Asia Cup soccer match to a visiting Japanese team, police squads stood by as rampaging fans burned Japanese flags, taunted Japanese players and smashed a window of the Japanese ambassador''s car. The rioting trapped some 2,000 Japanese fans in the stadium.
Many Japanese feel that China''s leaders tolerate, or even foment, anti-Japanese sentiment as an outlet for frustrations as they crush political dissent.
On Nov. 10, Japan detected a Chinese submarine in its territorial waters and chased it away, drawing a belated and mild apology from Beijing. The intrusion was seen as a sign that China is projecting naval power deep into the Pacific Ocean at Japan''s expense.
"China''s military strategy has become even more assertive in the oceans," said Ikuo Kayahara, a former lieutenant general in Japan''s Self-Defense Forces, noting that he believes China wants control of waters as far as the mid-Pacific Ocean.
For its part, China reacted angrily in December when Tokyo granted a visa to an 82-year-old former president of Taiwan, Lee Teng-hui, to spend his year-end holidays in Japan. Chinese authorities view Lee, who was educated in Japan and has long ties to the nation, as an architect of Taiwan''s push for independence.
Last month, for the first time ever, the Japanese government named China as a security concern, along with North Korea.
Japan is discussing slashing its development aid to China, which has only recently dipped below $1 billion a year. Many Chinese view the aid as disguised wartime reparations for Japan''s occupation of China and see no reason for it to end.
For their part, some Japanese voice frustration that they should aid a rival country that put a man in space in 2003 and will host the Olympic Games in 2008.
"China can stand on its own two feet. They are not so weak that they need help from other countries," said Fumio Kyuma, a former national defense chief and current legislator from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party.
Some Japanese laud Koizumi''s more confrontational stance toward China as a sign of backbone. Others, especially in the business community, see it as lacking in long-term strategy and skill in dealing with China''s expansion.
"The idea of an Asian rival is so novel that Japan simply doesn''t know how to respond," said Kurt W. Radtke, an Asia-Pacific specialist at Waseda University in Tokyo. "There''s a sort of uncontrollable apprehension about a rising China."
---
â 2005, Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.

China and the Final War for Resources
By Bill Ridley
Feb 15, 2005, 20:42
"What''s coming will be more devastating to the U.S. economy than any nuclear strike..." - The Asia Times
"Financial war is a form of nonmilitary warfare which is just as terribly destructive as a bloody war, but in which no blood is actually shed... When people revise the history books... the section on financial warfare will command the reader''s utmost attention."
-Unrestricted War: China''s Master Plan to Destroy America
"We are beholden to the Chinese by our Treasures. That worries me."
Carla Hills Former U.S. Trade Representative
"All Beijing has to do is to mention the possibility of a sell order going down the wires. It would devastate the U.S. economy more than any nuclear strike."
Asia Times, Jan. 23, 2004
The era of the resource war has arrived"
-Alexander Haig, Former Secretary of State
I. Unrestricted War
Unrestricted War: Chinâ?Ts Master Plan to Destroy America is a treatise for world domination written in 1999 by Peoplê?Ts Liberation Army Colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui. In order for China to become a dominant global power over the United States, the PLA emphasizes ?oThe Final War over Resources?, must be won.
The Colonels state that the aggressor nation ?omust adjust its own financial strategy, use currency revaluation or devaluation as primary weapons, and combine means such as getting the upper hand in public opinion and changing the rules sufficiently to make financial turbulence and economic crisis appear in the targeted country or area, weakening its overall power, including its military strength. Whether it be the intrusions of hackers, a major explosion at the World Trade Center, or a bombing attack by bin Laden, all of these greatly exceed the frequency bandwidths understood by the American military..."
Can you imagine if U.S. military leaders or politicians made such threatening comments? People would be up in arms and demanding resignations and Congressional inquiries!
However, in another case where truth is stranger than fiction ?" for the most part the U.S. media and government officials are keeping a lid on this volatile story. As you are about to read, the Chinese have already positioned themselves to inflict major damage to the U.S. economy. For those few brave souls in Washington and the media who are talking, their words are ominous.
Writing in the Los Angeles Times, Gal Luft, executive director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, said: "Without a comprehensive strategy designed to prevent China from becoming an oil consumer on par with the U.S., a superpower collision is in the cards." The New York Times has also weighed in stating that Chinâ?Ts actions threaten ?othe very stability of the global economy.?
The final war for the planet?Ts resources has already started. You name the commo***y and Chinâ?Ts buying it and consuming it in HUGE quantities. Last year they consumed nearly half of the world?Ts cement, twice the world?Ts consumption of copper, and nearly a third of the world?Ts coal, 90% of the world?Ts steel plus nearly every other commo***y you can think of has been in greater demand by China.
However in order to propel such furious economic growth, there is one key commo***y you need above all the others. And if you can?Tt get enough of it, having all the other resources won?Tt matter. The most prized and sought after commo***y which makes the world tick is oil. With out it, you have nothing. Your economy would be frozen and your military would be left inept.
As Chinâ?Ts Master Plan to Destroy America manifesto outlines, the multifaceted battle plan recommended by the Chinese military has taken shape..?
Financially: Using Currency as the Primary Weapon
I hate to admit it, but the Chinese have done a masterful job. While Americâ?Ts media is hypnotizing us with frivolous entertainment such as American Idol or The Amazing Race, they are totally ignoring the perilous economic time bomb the Chinese have placed against us. The Government of China is holding U.S. currency and Treasury notes in a $1.9 trillion Treasury bond trap. When they pull the trigger on their ?oprimary weapon,? the dollar will crash and gold will break $600 in a heart beat and just keep going.
Political and Military Alliances
China has made several deals with OPEC countries whose ideology is very much anti-American. Headlining the list is Iran who President Bush recently singled out as "the world''s primary state sponsor of terror pursuing nuclear weapons while depriving its people of the freedom they seek and deserve."
Also alliances have been made with Venezuela who are threatening to cut off oil exports to the U.S. entirely while giving China as much as it wants. These new deals China is making with these and other hostile OPEC countries also involve trading oil in euros not U.S. dollars. The dumping of U.S. dollars for euros would be devastating to an already weakening dollar.
Chinâ?Ts plan is both brilliant and deviously well planned. New alliances with radical groups, arms for oil deals with Iran, a new military build up, major acquisitions of large western resource companies such as Noranda are just a few of the multifaceted maneuvers now taking place.
In my last issue I reviewed the fact the U.S. oil demand is soaring while domestic supplies are dwindling forcing imports to increase to 60%. However many of Americâ?Ts foreign suppliers are hostile countries whose ideology and hatred have been forged over the decades and now have reached a boiling point in the Mid East.
Before we get into how the final war for resources is building momentum let?Ts recap the supply and demand scenarios of the U.S. and China.
II. The Growing Demand from a Dwindling Supply
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global demand for oil grew last year at its fastest pace since 1980, now averaging 88.1 million barrels a day. Out of that, about 20 million barrels of oil demand comes from the United States.
THAT''S A LOT OF OIL! And remember, once it''s burned, it''s gone for good!
Over the next twenty years the global demand for oil will increase sharply, hitting 120 million barrels by 2025. Asia is expected to consume 80% of that output ?" that is if there is that much extra supply capacity. Today production is barely keeping pace with the world?Ts consumption needs as it is.
What is even more concerning is that peak oil production has already hit all the world?Ts oil producing nations with the exception of Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia.
Colin Campbell, one of the world?Ts leading oil geologists, estimates global production will hit its peak this year. Campbell has stated that the world started using more oil then it found since 1981 and consuming from reserves of past discoveries ever since.
Oil Supply Shortages Likely After 2007, New Report Shows
Global oil suppliers could start to have difficulty meeting growing demand after 2007, according to a study of existing and planned major oil-recovery projects published this month in Petroleum Review.
While a flood of new production is set to hit the market over the next three years, the volumes expected from anticipated new projects thereafter are likely to fall well below requirements, the report says.
"There are not enough large-scale projects in the development pipeline right now to offset declining production in mature areas and meet global demand growth beyond 2007," said Chris Skrebowski, author of the report, e***or of Petroleum Review and a recently appointed Board member of the Oil Depletion Analysis Centre (ODAC) in London.
Major Oil Firms Actions Reflect a Peak Oil Market
Cre*** Suisse First Boston reported that major oil companies are replacing dwindling reserves by acquiring other oil companies instead of exploring for new fields, a strategic shift with implications for global oil supplies, according to a recent report.
?oIf the actions - rather than the words - of the oil business'' major players provide the best gauge of how they see the future, then ponder the following.. Crude oil prices have doubled since 2001, but oil companies have increased their budgets for exploring new oil fields by only a small fraction. Likewise, U.S. refineries are working close to capacity, yet no new refinery has been constructed since 1976. And oil tankers are fully booked, but outdated ships are being decommissioned faster than new ones are being built.?
- Mark Williams, Technology Review, February 2005
The rate of major new oil field discoveries has fallen dramatically in recent years.
There were 13 discoveries of over 500 million barrels in 2000, 6 in 2001 and just 2 in 2002, according to the industry analysts IHS Energy. For 2003, not a single new discovery over 500 million barrels has been reported.
It appears likely that from 2007, the volumes of new production will fall short of the need to replace lost capacity from depleting older fields.
Look at this imbalance: The average American consumes 25 barrels of oil a year. In China, the average is about 1.3 barrels per year; in India, less than onê?
The challenge is huge. For China and India to reach just one-quarter of the level of US oil consumption, world output would have to rise by 44 percent. To get to half the US level, world production would need to nearly double. That''s impossible. The world''s oil reserves are finite. And the view is spreading that global oil output will soon peak.
-- The Christian Science Monitor, January 20, 2005
Therê?Ts a historic oil market squeeze coming and it?Ts clear, not everyone on the planet will have their oil needs met. The San Francisco Chronicle predicts that a ?osocial and economic upheaval across the globê? is coming.
Consumption Statistics
We are living in an age where oil demand is escalating at an unprecedented rate while global production is on the decrease. Today one barrel of oil is found for every 6 consumed. The day of reasonably priced $35 barrel oil has come to an end.
With about 5% of the world?Ts population, the U.S. consumes about 25% of the world?Ts total oil supply. It?Ts hard to believe that just 50 years ago, America was producing half the world?Ts oil and today we can?Tt produce even half of our own needs.
From 1970 to date, our demand has increased from 17.7 million barrels of oil per day to nearly 21 million barrels. At the same time domestic oil production is decreasing, having dropped from 10 million barrels per day in 1970 to a projected 5.58 million barrels in 2005.
As a nation, the United States depends on foreign oil for 60% of its needs and that amount will only get bigger over time.
The Department of Energy forecasts consumption demand will be 26 million barrels a day or greater by 2020, imports representing two-thirds of the supply needed.
For America to maintain economic and military dominance, oil consumption will need to sharply increase. At the same time, other nations are also competing for the same supplies.
The world?Ts second largest consumer of oil is China whose oil consumption increased by 40% last year. Going forward Chinâ?Ts growing oil needs will present one of the largest obstacles facing the security of the United States. As you will soon read, their strategy for assuring themselves adequate supplies has been well planned economically, politically, and militarily.
As Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham pointed out, oil and economic strength go hand in hand. ?oEnergy security is a fundamental component of national security. Military force will be an increasingly important prerequisite to safe guard the flow of foreign oil.?
Without more oil for the U.S., the American dream is over. Without more oil for China, their dream of building a modern economy, strong currency, and a military superpower will be over.
$100 Oil
A startling fact is that world?Ts richest 1 billion people - just one-sixth of the world?Ts population - account for three-quarters or more of global consumption of oil, steel, cement, copper, aluminum, timber, coal, and other energy. You could say it?Ts this group of consumers who have helped pushed the price of oil up beyond $50 a barrel.
A United Nations report points out that Chinâ?Ts recent prosperity has raised the living standard of 160 million Chinese who once existed in poverty. Behind them are another 1 billion who are awaiting their turn to live a life once thought unattainable. As the Chinese middle class grows so will the demand of goods and services which require oil to produce them.
Given the projections from the U.S. Department of Energy and other oil experts, it?Ts not hard to envision $100 oil in the not too distant future.
As the global trend for greater oil demand grows over the months ahead it?Ts clear there are those in the world who will get the short end of the oil supply and other commo***ies. It?Ts also clear either the United States or China will not get all the oil they require. Hence, the Final War for Resources.
III. China and the Final War for Resources
Using Currency as the Primary Weapon
The U.S. government has been keeping a lid on the brewing problems with China because of the delicate situation which has the Chinese Central Bank holding billions in U.S. dollars and treasury bonds which Washington fears they might stop buying or sell off.
China has been instrumental in helping the U.S. government bank roll its national debt and consequently, this reliance on the Chinese *****pport has America up against a rock and a hard place.
Meanwhile, the United States is financing its ever ballooning budget deficit, which is officially reported to be $412 billion in 2004 up $35 billion over 2003.
Adding to the overall debt problem is the trade deficit shortfall of $575 billion with China accounting for the greatest imbalance last year of $150 billion. So all told, the nation spent $987 billion more then what it brought in over 2004.
National Debt Increases by over $2 billion daily.
The Treasury Trap: So with this large annual trade surplus China enjoys with the United States, billions are spent to buy up Treasury bonds and notes. The total federal debt in FY 2004 exceeded $7.4 Trillion. By the end of January 2005 it was up to $7.631 Trillion and it is growing at a rate of over $2 billion a day. Most of this debt is owed to what the Federal Reserve calls the ''public,'' from whom the federal government borrowed and gave T-Bonds, T-bills, etc. in return. But, the ''public'' does not mean only U.S. citizens - - it means anyone in the world who owns those IOUs, with a right to the principal and interest pertaining to same.
The United States is the world''s largest DEBTOR NATION, and continue to rely on foreigners to help finance our over spending. Foreigners hold $1.9 trillion of our debt with China accounting for 10% or $190 billion. If they or any other major country start a sell off of the greenback, the U.S. dollar would be in crisis.
Added to the treasury notes held by China, the U.S. dollar reserves of Chinâ?Ts central bank soared 271% to $449 billion from 2000 to April of 2004.
Zhu Min, general manager and advisor to the President for the Bank of China was quoted in the China Daily last year saying that: ?oThe United States is benefiting from China using its trade surplus to buy U.S. Treasury paper as a reserve currency, along with other Asian nations. But in the long run, this is not sustainable.... China will focus more and more on domestic demand, which is growing fast. Then we won''t be able to finance the U.S. deficit."
So the multi billion dollar question is what happens when China starts selling U.S. dollars to help expand their infrastructure and secure their supply of global resources?
A year ago, the Wall Street Journal reported that a sell off of U.S. treasuries has already started. If a small country like Vietnam or Thailand started selling it may not be the end of the world but if China started selling, the U.S. economy would be in a tail spin. Long term interest rates would climb and bond yields would sky rocket. This could start a stampede of selling which would devastate the stock market. This is the treasury trap America is in.
Though a major sell off hasn?Tt happened, it?Ts clear the U.S. dollar is losing ground to the euro and other major currencies. Consequently we have seen rising interest rates, a falling dollar and an upward flight of gold as well as upward pressure on oil, gas, coal, copper and other key commo***ies.
The implications of this fact are staggering. As the demand for commo***ies increases, insightful investors who can see this trend and position themselves now in growth oriented equities holding gold, oil, copper and other key commo***ies will be sitting pretty if a few years time and will have weathered the U.S. dollar collapse better than most.
In the final war for resources there are no clear winners. Everyone on the globe will feel the pinch. Some countries will fare better than others. The question remains, how will the United States come out of this? This is after all the hugest threat to the national security that the country faces yet it?Ts hardly ever mentioned by the mainstream media.
Given the strong economic growth of China and the uncertain purse strings it holds on U.S. dollars and treasury bonds, I can?Tt help but wonder how this might tie in with their aggressive militaristic actions lately.

China and the Final War for Resources
By Bill Ridley
Feb 15, 2005, 20:42
"What''s coming will be more devastating to the U.S. economy than any nuclear strike..." - The Asia Times
"Financial war is a form of nonmilitary warfare which is just as terribly destructive as a bloody war, but in which no blood is actually shed... When people revise the history books... the section on financial warfare will command the reader''s utmost attention."
-Unrestricted War: China''s Master Plan to Destroy America
"We are beholden to the Chinese by our Treasures. That worries me."
Carla Hills Former U.S. Trade Representative
"All Beijing has to do is to mention the possibility of a sell order going down the wires. It would devastate the U.S. economy more than any nuclear strike."
Asia Times, Jan. 23, 2004
The era of the resource war has arrived"
-Alexander Haig, Former Secretary of State
I. Unrestricted War
Unrestricted War: Chinâ?Ts Master Plan to Destroy America is a treatise for world domination written in 1999 by Peoplê?Ts Liberation Army Colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui. In order for China to become a dominant global power over the United States, the PLA emphasizes ?oThe Final War over Resources?, must be won.
The Colonels state that the aggressor nation ?omust adjust its own financial strategy, use currency revaluation or devaluation as primary weapons, and combine means such as getting the upper hand in public opinion and changing the rules sufficiently to make financial turbulence and economic crisis appear in the targeted country or area, weakening its overall power, including its military strength. Whether it be the intrusions of hackers, a major explosion at the World Trade Center, or a bombing attack by bin Laden, all of these greatly exceed the frequency bandwidths understood by the American military..."
Can you imagine if U.S. military leaders or politicians made such threatening comments? People would be up in arms and demanding resignations and Congressional inquiries!
However, in another case where truth is stranger than fiction ?" for the most part the U.S. media and government officials are keeping a lid on this volatile story. As you are about to read, the Chinese have already positioned themselves to inflict major damage to the U.S. economy. For those few brave souls in Washington and the media who are talking, their words are ominous.
Writing in the Los Angeles Times, Gal Luft, executive director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, said: "Without a comprehensive strategy designed to prevent China from becoming an oil consumer on par with the U.S., a superpower collision is in the cards." The New York Times has also weighed in stating that Chinâ?Ts actions threaten ?othe very stability of the global economy.?
The final war for the planet?Ts resources has already started. You name the commo***y and Chinâ?Ts buying it and consuming it in HUGE quantities. Last year they consumed nearly half of the world?Ts cement, twice the world?Ts consumption of copper, and nearly a third of the world?Ts coal, 90% of the world?Ts steel plus nearly every other commo***y you can think of has been in greater demand by China.
However in order to propel such furious economic growth, there is one key commo***y you need above all the others. And if you can?Tt get enough of it, having all the other resources won?Tt matter. The most prized and sought after commo***y which makes the world tick is oil. With out it, you have nothing. Your economy would be frozen and your military would be left inept.
As Chinâ?Ts Master Plan to Destroy America manifesto outlines, the multifaceted battle plan recommended by the Chinese military has taken shape..?
Financially: Using Currency as the Primary Weapon
I hate to admit it, but the Chinese have done a masterful job. While Americâ?Ts media is hypnotizing us with frivolous entertainment such as American Idol or The Amazing Race, they are totally ignoring the perilous economic time bomb the Chinese have placed against us. The Government of China is holding U.S. currency and Treasury notes in a $1.9 trillion Treasury bond trap. When they pull the trigger on their ?oprimary weapon,? the dollar will crash and gold will break $600 in a heart beat and just keep going.
Political and Military Alliances
China has made several deals with OPEC countries whose ideology is very much anti-American. Headlining the list is Iran who President Bush recently singled out as "the world''s primary state sponsor of terror pursuing nuclear weapons while depriving its people of the freedom they seek and deserve."
Also alliances have been made with Venezuela who are threatening to cut off oil exports to the U.S. entirely while giving China as much as it wants. These new deals China is making with these and other hostile OPEC countries also involve trading oil in euros not U.S. dollars. The dumping of U.S. dollars for euros would be devastating to an already weakening dollar.
Chinâ?Ts plan is both brilliant and deviously well planned. New alliances with radical groups, arms for oil deals with Iran, a new military build up, major acquisitions of large western resource companies such as Noranda are just a few of the multifaceted maneuvers now taking place.
In my last issue I reviewed the fact the U.S. oil demand is soaring while domestic supplies are dwindling forcing imports to increase to 60%. However many of Americâ?Ts foreign suppliers are hostile countries whose ideology and hatred have been forged over the decades and now have reached a boiling point in the Mid East.
Before we get into how the final war for resources is building momentum let?Ts recap the supply and demand scenarios of the U.S. and China.
II. The Growing Demand from a Dwindling Supply
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global demand for oil grew last year at its fastest pace since 1980, now averaging 88.1 million barrels a day. Out of that, about 20 million barrels of oil demand comes from the United States.
THAT''S A LOT OF OIL! And remember, once it''s burned, it''s gone for good!
Over the next twenty years the global demand for oil will increase sharply, hitting 120 million barrels by 2025. Asia is expected to consume 80% of that output ?" that is if there is that much extra supply capacity. Today production is barely keeping pace with the world?Ts consumption needs as it is.
What is even more concerning is that peak oil production has already hit all the world?Ts oil producing nations with the exception of Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia.
Colin Campbell, one of the world?Ts leading oil geologists, estimates global production will hit its peak this year. Campbell has stated that the world started using more oil then it found since 1981 and consuming from reserves of past discoveries ever since.
Oil Supply Shortages Likely After 2007, New Report Shows
Global oil suppliers could start to have difficulty meeting growing demand after 2007, according to a study of existing and planned major oil-recovery projects published this month in Petroleum Review.
While a flood of new production is set to hit the market over the next three years, the volumes expected from anticipated new projects thereafter are likely to fall well below requirements, the report says.
"There are not enough large-scale projects in the development pipeline right now to offset declining production in mature areas and meet global demand growth beyond 2007," said Chris Skrebowski, author of the report, e***or of Petroleum Review and a recently appointed Board member of the Oil Depletion Analysis Centre (ODAC) in London.
Major Oil Firms Actions Reflect a Peak Oil Market
Cre*** Suisse First Boston reported that major oil companies are replacing dwindling reserves by acquiring other oil companies instead of exploring for new fields, a strategic shift with implications for global oil supplies, according to a recent report.
?oIf the actions - rather than the words - of the oil business'' major players provide the best gauge of how they see the future, then ponder the following.. Crude oil prices have doubled since 2001, but oil companies have increased their budgets for exploring new oil fields by only a small fraction. Likewise, U.S. refineries are working close to capacity, yet no new refinery has been constructed since 1976. And oil tankers are fully booked, but outdated ships are being decommissioned faster than new ones are being built.?
- Mark Williams, Technology Review, February 2005
The rate of major new oil field discoveries has fallen dramatically in recent years.
There were 13 discoveries of over 500 million barrels in 2000, 6 in 2001 and just 2 in 2002, according to the industry analysts IHS Energy. For 2003, not a single new discovery over 500 million barrels has been reported.
It appears likely that from 2007, the volumes of new production will fall short of the need to replace lost capacity from depleting older fields.
Look at this imbalance: The average American consumes 25 barrels of oil a year. In China, the average is about 1.3 barrels per year; in India, less than onê?
The challenge is huge. For China and India to reach just one-quarter of the level of US oil consumption, world output would have to rise by 44 percent. To get to half the US level, world production would need to nearly double. That''s impossible. The world''s oil reserves are finite. And the view is spreading that global oil output will soon peak.
-- The Christian Science Monitor, January 20, 2005
Therê?Ts a historic oil market squeeze coming and it?Ts clear, not everyone on the planet will have their oil needs met. The San Francisco Chronicle predicts that a ?osocial and economic upheaval across the globê? is coming.
Consumption Statistics
We are living in an age where oil demand is escalating at an unprecedented rate while global production is on the decrease. Today one barrel of oil is found for every 6 consumed. The day of reasonably priced $35 barrel oil has come to an end.
With about 5% of the world?Ts population, the U.S. consumes about 25% of the world?Ts total oil supply. It?Ts hard to believe that just 50 years ago, America was producing half the world?Ts oil and today we can?Tt produce even half of our own needs.
From 1970 to date, our demand has increased from 17.7 million barrels of oil per day to nearly 21 million barrels. At the same time domestic oil production is decreasing, having dropped from 10 million barrels per day in 1970 to a projected 5.58 million barrels in 2005.
As a nation, the United States depends on foreign oil for 60% of its needs and that amount will only get bigger over time.
The Department of Energy forecasts consumption demand will be 26 million barrels a day or greater by 2020, imports representing two-thirds of the supply needed.
For America to maintain economic and military dominance, oil consumption will need to sharply increase. At the same time, other nations are also competing for the same supplies.
The world?Ts second largest consumer of oil is China whose oil consumption increased by 40% last year. Going forward Chinâ?Ts growing oil needs will present one of the largest obstacles facing the security of the United States. As you will soon read, their strategy for assuring themselves adequate supplies has been well planned economically, politically, and militarily.
As Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham pointed out, oil and economic strength go hand in hand. ?oEnergy security is a fundamental component of national security. Military force will be an increasingly important prerequisite to safe guard the flow of foreign oil.?
Without more oil for the U.S., the American dream is over. Without more oil for China, their dream of building a modern economy, strong currency, and a military superpower will be over.
$100 Oil
A startling fact is that world?Ts richest 1 billion people - just one-sixth of the world?Ts population - account for three-quarters or more of global consumption of oil, steel, cement, copper, aluminum, timber, coal, and other energy. You could say it?Ts this group of consumers who have helped pushed the price of oil up beyond $50 a barrel.
A United Nations report points out that Chinâ?Ts recent prosperity has raised the living standard of 160 million Chinese who once existed in poverty. Behind them are another 1 billion who are awaiting their turn to live a life once thought unattainable. As the Chinese middle class grows so will the demand of goods and services which require oil to produce them.
Given the projections from the U.S. Department of Energy and other oil experts, it?Ts not hard to envision $100 oil in the not too distant future.
As the global trend for greater oil demand grows over the months ahead it?Ts clear there are those in the world who will get the short end of the oil supply and other commo***ies. It?Ts also clear either the United States or China will not get all the oil they require. Hence, the Final War for Resources.
III. China and the Final War for Resources
Using Currency as the Primary Weapon
The U.S. government has been keeping a lid on the brewing problems with China because of the delicate situation which has the Chinese Central Bank holding billions in U.S. dollars and treasury bonds which Washington fears they might stop buying or sell off.
China has been instrumental in helping the U.S. government bank roll its national debt and consequently, this reliance on the Chinese *****pport has America up against a rock and a hard place.
Meanwhile, the United States is financing its ever ballooning budget deficit, which is officially reported to be $412 billion in 2004 up $35 billion over 2003.
Adding to the overall debt problem is the trade deficit shortfall of $575 billion with China accounting for the greatest imbalance last year of $150 billion. So all told, the nation spent $987 billion more then what it brought in over 2004.
National Debt Increases by over $2 billion daily.
The Treasury Trap: So with this large annual trade surplus China enjoys with the United States, billions are spent to buy up Treasury bonds and notes. The total federal debt in FY 2004 exceeded $7.4 Trillion. By the end of January 2005 it was up to $7.631 Trillion and it is growing at a rate of over $2 billion a day. Most of this debt is owed to what the Federal Reserve calls the ''public,'' from whom the federal government borrowed and gave T-Bonds, T-bills, etc. in return. But, the ''public'' does not mean only U.S. citizens - - it means anyone in the world who owns those IOUs, with a right to the principal and interest pertaining to same.
The United States is the world''s largest DEBTOR NATION, and continue to rely on foreigners to help finance our over spending. Foreigners hold $1.9 trillion of our debt with China accounting for 10% or $190 billion. If they or any other major country start a sell off of the greenback, the U.S. dollar would be in crisis.
Added to the treasury notes held by China, the U.S. dollar reserves of Chinâ?Ts central bank soared 271% to $449 billion from 2000 to April of 2004.
Zhu Min, general manager and advisor to the President for the Bank of China was quoted in the China Daily last year saying that: ?oThe United States is benefiting from China using its trade surplus to buy U.S. Treasury paper as a reserve currency, along with other Asian nations. But in the long run, this is not sustainable.... China will focus more and more on domestic demand, which is growing fast. Then we won''t be able to finance the U.S. deficit."
So the multi billion dollar question is what happens when China starts selling U.S. dollars to help expand their infrastructure and secure their supply of global resources?
A year ago, the Wall Street Journal reported that a sell off of U.S. treasuries has already started. If a small country like Vietnam or Thailand started selling it may not be the end of the world but if China started selling, the U.S. economy would be in a tail spin. Long term interest rates would climb and bond yields would sky rocket. This could start a stampede of selling which would devastate the stock market. This is the treasury trap America is in.
Though a major sell off hasn?Tt happened, it?Ts clear the U.S. dollar is losing ground to the euro and other major currencies. Consequently we have seen rising interest rates, a falling dollar and an upward flight of gold as well as upward pressure on oil, gas, coal, copper and other key commo***ies.
The implications of this fact are staggering. As the demand for commo***ies increases, insightful investors who can see this trend and position themselves now in growth oriented equities holding gold, oil, copper and other key commo***ies will be sitting pretty if a few years time and will have weathered the U.S. dollar collapse better than most.
In the final war for resources there are no clear winners. Everyone on the globe will feel the pinch. Some countries will fare better than others. The question remains, how will the United States come out of this? This is after all the hugest threat to the national security that the country faces yet it?Ts hardly ever mentioned by the mainstream media.
Given the strong economic growth of China and the uncertain purse strings it holds on U.S. dollars and treasury bonds, I can?Tt help but wonder how this might tie in with their aggressive militaristic actions lately.

continue from above
Military Maneuvering and Strategic Alliances
As the last War for Resources heats up so does the military posturing, alliances and build up of arms.
Last November a Chinese nuclear powered submarine cruised into Japanese territorial waters in an apparent test of Japan?Ts will to enforce its own sovereignty. The Chinese navy tried to stop a Norwegian survey ship (working for Japan) from conducting its work, and two Japanese naval vessels apparently chased a Chinese submarine away. A Bloomberg News report from Tokyo says Japan is considering issuing petroleum leases in the disputed area.
Though the war for resources includes Japan and its territory, it?Ts really the Persian Gulf and Caspian Basin where the biggest power struggles are occurring. This comes in the form of alliances in order to influence and control the political landscape of an oil producing nation. What this usually means is supplying military hardware, troops, or training which the politicians refer to as ?oaid.? More to the point, you give us oil and we give you military hardware, training, and protection.
One fact which doesn?Tt sit well with the Bush Administration is that U.S. intelligence reports claim Chinâ?Ts military provided training to both the Taliban and al Qaeda. Though U.S. officials are at a loss to explain why the Chinese provided this training some analysts believe it was an attempt to gain influence over these terrorist groups.
President Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld have all stated that the protection of Americâ?Ts oil supplies is the most important national security priority. However, as strong as Washington?Ts views are, the same view is held by Chinese leaders in terms of their own county?Ts national security.
Chinâ?Ts minister for state land and resources remarked in 2002 that rising demand for imported oil will ?oincrease supply side risks?and will damage the country?Ts capacity to ensure its oil resources as well as economic and political security.?
In January, Bill Gertz reported in the Washington Times on a briefing by Booz Allen Hamilton entitled ''Energy Futures in Asia''. The conclusions of the report state that China fears the US is too easily able to disrupt energy supplies in the event of a conflict. So China has adopted a "string of pearls" strategy of military bases and diplomatic ties stretching from the Middle East to southern China that includes a combination of dual purpose naval installations at critical chokepoints.
A previously undisclosed internal report prepared for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld reiterated this point. "China is building strategic relationships along the sea lanes from the Middle East to the South China Sea in ways that suggest defensive and offensive positioning to protect China''s energy interests, but also to serve broad security objectives."
The report reflects growing fears in the Pentagon that China''s military buildup is taking place faster than earlier estimates, and that China will use its power to project force and undermine U.S. and regional security.
Chinese weapons for sea-lane control include new warships equipped with long-range cruise missiles, submarines and undersea mines, the report said. China also is buying aircraft and long-range target acquisition systems, including optical satellites and maritime unmanned aerial vehicles.
The report states that Chinese believe that the United States as an ?ounpredictable country? that violates others'' sovereignty and wants to "encircle" China.
Eighty percent of China''s oil currently passes through the Strait of Malacca, and China believes the sea area is "controlled by the U.S. Navy." Oil-tanker traffic through the Strait, which is closest to Indonesia, is projected to grow from 10 million barrels a day in 2002 to 20 million barrels a day in 2020, the report said.
Chinese specialists interviewed for the report said the United States has the military capability to cut off Chinese oil imports and could "severely cripple" China by blocking its energy supplies.
Throughout the 1990?Ts as the neoconservatives started becoming more vocal about national security issues focusing on rouge states such as Saddam?Ts Iraq but China was always on the top of the list as being the most potentially troublesome.
The primary concern was oil and getting our fair share in the face of raising demand from China. Furthering the national security issue was Chinâ?Ts support of rouge states.
Very troubling for the United States is the fact that China has negotiated a new oil supply deal with Iran which would see Iran receiving both arms and cash. China has long standing alliances with Iran and has supported Iran?Ts efforts to develop nuclear power amid much protesting from the U.S. and Western Europe allies.
As President Bush embarks on his second term in office, news agencies from around the globe are commenting that Iran could be the next target for Bush?Ts war on terror campaign. In his State of the Union address President Bush characterized Iran as "the world''s primary state sponsor of terror pursuing nuclear weapons while depriving its people of the freedom they seek and deserve."
Another troublesome situation is with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez whose hatred for the U.S. is well known. He has signed an energy pact with China and has publicly stated he will divert as much oil as possible to the Chinese. As Venezuela is the fourth biggest supplier of oil to the U.S., Washington has instructed the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to investigate the potential impact this could have.
Seth de Long, a senior research fellow with the U.S.-based Council on Hemispheric Affairs, is also concerned with China''s quest for energy security:
"China''s recent initiative towards Venezuela comes at a time when Beijing has just recently indicated that it has similar designs on Canadian oil markets that today are dominated by the U.S.," he said in an analysis published this week. "In other words, not only is Beijing poking its nose in ''our backyard,'' but Washington''s front yard as well."
China is aggressively forging alliances and attempting mergers with other countries as well through it?Ts national oil corporations. ?oChinâ?Ts energy security is the first concern? stated a China National Petrochemical Corp. executive. Deals have also been made with Angola, Burma, Ecuador, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Oman, Peru, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Thailand, and Yemen.
?oThe relative fortunes of any power in this epic contest will rest on a combination of military strength, geographic advantage, economic might, strategic prowess, diplomatic cunning, and many other factors.? Blood and Oil, Michael Klare
Conclusion
There is no question that China is a booming economic powerhouse with a huge appetite for global commo***ies and primarily oil. Just how far will China go in following their master plan to destroy America in order to secure their energy requirements? Only time will tell.
Despite what Washington may say about Iran, it?Ts China is the primary number-one national security threat for these reasons:
China and the United States are the largest users and competitors for the world''s rapidly diminishing oil reserves. Going forward, the US and Chinâ?Ts projected requirements will consume 60%-70% of the world?Ts production. This demand cannot be met and one country will experience brown outs, gasoline shortages, factory shutdowns as a result of having a lack of energy.
China has aligned itself with Iran, cited by Bush as the world?Ts leading terrorist exporting nation and nuclear threat. Military alliances with Iran coupled with a massive naval build up have Washington concerned.
The Chinese have the United States in a dollar and Treasury note trap which could put the economy in a tail spin with one news announcement that they are no longer buyers of U.S. debt.
The war for final resources is the ultimate global showdown. The Peoplê?Ts Liberation Army Colonels have developed a blueprint to destroy America. Actions, not words, seem to be bearing out this fact. China is merging financial, economic, political, and military forces together in a pursuit to dominate the world?Ts resources, particularly oil.
Regardless of the unknown factors, the facts we are aware of support the premise that in order to protect ourselves as a private investors, diversification into gold, oil and other key commo***ies makes good sense not only to profit but help keep your wealth intact in the face of a depreciating dollar.

continue from above
Military Maneuvering and Strategic Alliances
As the last War for Resources heats up so does the military posturing, alliances and build up of arms.
Last November a Chinese nuclear powered submarine cruised into Japanese territorial waters in an apparent test of Japan?Ts will to enforce its own sovereignty. The Chinese navy tried to stop a Norwegian survey ship (working for Japan) from conducting its work, and two Japanese naval vessels apparently chased a Chinese submarine away. A Bloomberg News report from Tokyo says Japan is considering issuing petroleum leases in the disputed area.
Though the war for resources includes Japan and its territory, it?Ts really the Persian Gulf and Caspian Basin where the biggest power struggles are occurring. This comes in the form of alliances in order to influence and control the political landscape of an oil producing nation. What this usually means is supplying military hardware, troops, or training which the politicians refer to as ?oaid.? More to the point, you give us oil and we give you military hardware, training, and protection.
One fact which doesn?Tt sit well with the Bush Administration is that U.S. intelligence reports claim Chinâ?Ts military provided training to both the Taliban and al Qaeda. Though U.S. officials are at a loss to explain why the Chinese provided this training some analysts believe it was an attempt to gain influence over these terrorist groups.
President Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld have all stated that the protection of Americâ?Ts oil supplies is the most important national security priority. However, as strong as Washington?Ts views are, the same view is held by Chinese leaders in terms of their own county?Ts national security.
Chinâ?Ts minister for state land and resources remarked in 2002 that rising demand for imported oil will ?oincrease supply side risks?and will damage the country?Ts capacity to ensure its oil resources as well as economic and political security.?
In January, Bill Gertz reported in the Washington Times on a briefing by Booz Allen Hamilton entitled ''Energy Futures in Asia''. The conclusions of the report state that China fears the US is too easily able to disrupt energy supplies in the event of a conflict. So China has adopted a "string of pearls" strategy of military bases and diplomatic ties stretching from the Middle East to southern China that includes a combination of dual purpose naval installations at critical chokepoints.
A previously undisclosed internal report prepared for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld reiterated this point. "China is building strategic relationships along the sea lanes from the Middle East to the South China Sea in ways that suggest defensive and offensive positioning to protect China''s energy interests, but also to serve broad security objectives."
The report reflects growing fears in the Pentagon that China''s military buildup is taking place faster than earlier estimates, and that China will use its power to project force and undermine U.S. and regional security.
Chinese weapons for sea-lane control include new warships equipped with long-range cruise missiles, submarines and undersea mines, the report said. China also is buying aircraft and long-range target acquisition systems, including optical satellites and maritime unmanned aerial vehicles.
The report states that Chinese believe that the United States as an ?ounpredictable country? that violates others'' sovereignty and wants to "encircle" China.
Eighty percent of China''s oil currently passes through the Strait of Malacca, and China believes the sea area is "controlled by the U.S. Navy." Oil-tanker traffic through the Strait, which is closest to Indonesia, is projected to grow from 10 million barrels a day in 2002 to 20 million barrels a day in 2020, the report said.
Chinese specialists interviewed for the report said the United States has the military capability to cut off Chinese oil imports and could "severely cripple" China by blocking its energy supplies.
Throughout the 1990?Ts as the neoconservatives started becoming more vocal about national security issues focusing on rouge states such as Saddam?Ts Iraq but China was always on the top of the list as being the most potentially troublesome.
The primary concern was oil and getting our fair share in the face of raising demand from China. Furthering the national security issue was Chinâ?Ts support of rouge states.
Very troubling for the United States is the fact that China has negotiated a new oil supply deal with Iran which would see Iran receiving both arms and cash. China has long standing alliances with Iran and has supported Iran?Ts efforts to develop nuclear power amid much protesting from the U.S. and Western Europe allies.
As President Bush embarks on his second term in office, news agencies from around the globe are commenting that Iran could be the next target for Bush?Ts war on terror campaign. In his State of the Union address President Bush characterized Iran as "the world''s primary state sponsor of terror pursuing nuclear weapons while depriving its people of the freedom they seek and deserve."
Another troublesome situation is with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez whose hatred for the U.S. is well known. He has signed an energy pact with China and has publicly stated he will divert as much oil as possible to the Chinese. As Venezuela is the fourth biggest supplier of oil to the U.S., Washington has instructed the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to investigate the potential impact this could have.
Seth de Long, a senior research fellow with the U.S.-based Council on Hemispheric Affairs, is also concerned with China''s quest for energy security:
"China''s recent initiative towards Venezuela comes at a time when Beijing has just recently indicated that it has similar designs on Canadian oil markets that today are dominated by the U.S.," he said in an analysis published this week. "In other words, not only is Beijing poking its nose in ''our backyard,'' but Washington''s front yard as well."
China is aggressively forging alliances and attempting mergers with other countries as well through it?Ts national oil corporations. ?oChinâ?Ts energy security is the first concern? stated a China National Petrochemical Corp. executive. Deals have also been made with Angola, Burma, Ecuador, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Oman, Peru, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Thailand, and Yemen.
?oThe relative fortunes of any power in this epic contest will rest on a combination of military strength, geographic advantage, economic might, strategic prowess, diplomatic cunning, and many other factors.? Blood and Oil, Michael Klare
Conclusion
There is no question that China is a booming economic powerhouse with a huge appetite for global commo***ies and primarily oil. Just how far will China go in following their master plan to destroy America in order to secure their energy requirements? Only time will tell.
Despite what Washington may say about Iran, it?Ts China is the primary number-one national security threat for these reasons:
China and the United States are the largest users and competitors for the world''s rapidly diminishing oil reserves. Going forward, the US and Chinâ?Ts projected requirements will consume 60%-70% of the world?Ts production. This demand cannot be met and one country will experience brown outs, gasoline shortages, factory shutdowns as a result of having a lack of energy.
China has aligned itself with Iran, cited by Bush as the world?Ts leading terrorist exporting nation and nuclear threat. Military alliances with Iran coupled with a massive naval build up have Washington concerned.
The Chinese have the United States in a dollar and Treasury note trap which could put the economy in a tail spin with one news announcement that they are no longer buyers of U.S. debt.
The war for final resources is the ultimate global showdown. The Peoplê?Ts Liberation Army Colonels have developed a blueprint to destroy America. Actions, not words, seem to be bearing out this fact. China is merging financial, economic, political, and military forces together in a pursuit to dominate the world?Ts resources, particularly oil.
Regardless of the unknown factors, the facts we are aware of support the premise that in order to protect ourselves as a private investors, diversification into gold, oil and other key commo***ies makes good sense not only to profit but help keep your wealth intact in the face of a depreciating dollar.

Đây là loại radar mà Bác triumf nói nhưng tầm của nó chỉ có 200km thôi.
Còn đây cũng là một loại radar mà BBN cũng vừa mua vài năm gần đây,sắp tới còn đặt mua radar của BL nhưng không biết là loại gì.Hình như thiếu radar lắm sau mà thấy cứ mua radar hoài
À Bác TuanUSA xem lại hộ tôi thấy loại KH-31 nặng hơn nhiều so với KH-35 ấy chứ,loại Kh-31 tới 600 kg lặn còn loại Kh-35 chỉ có 480kg thôi.trên có hình Kh-31 rồi đây là hình Kh-35 .
Được Bradley sửa chữa / chuyển vào 18:53 ngày 16/02/2005