TOPICS FOR ORAL EXAMINATION

please help me!!!!!!!
t ôi muốn các bạn viết dùm tôi nh ừng chủ đề này được không?( tôi sắp thi rồi đó nhanh lên nha)
TOPICS FOR ORAL EXAMINATION
1. Youth and unemployment
2. pollution and health
3. AIDS
4. The importance of continuing education
5. Marriage and divorce
6. Love and Money
7. Parents aand children
8. Retired people
9. Population and family planning
10. Tra***ions
11. Computers and life
12. Inflation
13. The fole of women in family and in society
14. the role of teachers in society
15. A friend in need is a friend indeed

If you are a tour guide, which places of intererst would you like to introduce to tour guide? Why?

Ho+`, sao lại túm vào mắng một người thế này ???, những bài viết kiểu như thế này thiếu gì đâu, và tất nhiên chỉ dùng để tham khảo và học hỏi ý tưởng , có nhiều cách nhình nhận khác nhau về một vấn đề càng tốt chứ sao, còn chuyện thi cử thì ai fair play thì sẽ fair thui ah
To reliable_boy1:
Bác có thể tìm những essay kiểu như thế này trên Net rất nhiều, tương đối hay và rất Issue. tôi search giùm bác một assay nee

Now that Rob knew the ladies had a million-dollar check influencing their "heartfelt" decisions, he had a new perspective on the game of love. He also had the added incentive that if he got the lady he chose to choose him over the million bucks, Rob would win a million dollars. Paige and Erin soon learned that if Rob picked them, they wouldn''t automatically receive their million. Up until this point in the game, they had no idea they''d have to choose between Rob or the money. They thought they''d have their hunk and riches too. Paige just kept saying "oh my gosh" over and over. Erin just smiled and said, "interesting." Jordan (he''s the host in case you forgot), kept reminding them that it was one or the other. If they chose the money, they''d never see Rob again. If they chose Rob, they could kiss their money goodbye. Once Jordan left, Erin and Paige tried to weasel out of each other what they would pick. Erin thought Paige would always pick Rob, while Paige seemed convinced that Erin would take the cash. Erin had already made her mind up, but refused to tell Paige (wise move, Erin). Paige, on the other hand, boiled it down to this: If she chose the money it would be bad karma. However, if she chose Rob, she''d be letting her family down because they really needed the money. Erin told her to follow her heart and then, nodded yes when Paige asked, "You would take the money, right?" Way to stick to your plan Erin. The next few minutes were Paige asking questions of Erin, then answering them for Erin and Erin either nodding or not doing anything.
Later, Rob dropped by for dinner and neither Erin nor Paige gave him a hug hello. During an awkward group dinner, Paige was feeling a little left out as Erin and Rob discussed politics and books. Things got worse when Erin and Rob referred to rock-paper-scissors as "farkling", and Paige had the nerve to say she didn''t know what that meant. As the Rob and Erin show progressed, Paige excused herself to go upstairs, convinced that Erin would be Rob''s choice. Meanwhile, back in the dining room, Erin started to fall under Rob''s spell. Seconds later, Rob and Paige were hugging outside. Paige was trying really hard to figure out the "love or money" thing. Rob, meanwhile, was trying to figure out the same thing. If only they knew! It apparently meant a lot to Rob that Paige had removed her Promise Ring for him (even though she hadn''t acted on it). Paige was just making room for another ring? In between gazing lovingly at each other, Rob and Paige smooched. Rob wanted to let Paige know that he cares about her. He said (to camera) that he felt she was most likely out of the two remaining women to pick him over the money.
Erin was next up for "Rob time." Rob still wasn''t sure if Erin would choose him or the money. Last week, when Erin told Rob that he "grabbed her heart" it made a huge impression on him. They held hands, but Erin was really nervous and wouldn''t let it go much further. Eventually, they got into some lip-smacking goodness, but not much. Rob told Erin that he "really liked her so much." Then, they went back inside. Everyone was perplexed. Love. Money. Love. Money. What to do, what to do. The pros and cons were weighed. The potential of each person was contemplated. Over and over and over. Cut to the chase already!
Once Rob left the house, Erin made a confession to Paige. She told Paige that she sensed that Rob would choose Paige in the end. Little Paige''s head was spinning! Erin told her that she thought Rob was falling in love with her. Was it a cruel manipulation on Erin''s part - or did she really believe that Rob would choose Paige after he told Erin that he liked her soooo much? According to Erin, Rob is just really, really attracted to her, but has deeper feelings for Paige. Maybe Erin should start her own psychic hotline since she''s all of a sudden so in tune with every else''s emotions. Then it was Paige''s turn to drop a bombshell. She''d already decided to choose Rob over the money. Family be damned! Time seemed to stand still as Erin and Paige rehashed the love or money debate and tried to guess what Rob was thinking. Then the question became "If Rob proposed, would you say yes?" Paige had no hesitation answering. After all, she''d already ***ched the promise ring to make room for a big, fat diamond. Erin, on the other hand, was convinced Rob would never propose to her in the first place.
Finally, the day of truth arrived. Rob knew that whomever he chose would have to choose between him and the money. He also knew, and the women didn''t, that if Erin or Paige picked Rob over the cash that they would both split the million dollars. Rob would also reveal to Erin and Paige that he knew about the money since before Kelly was eliminated. Rob said he was going to pick the girl that he had the strongest feelings towards and who he could picture himself with in five years. His plan was to pour his heart out to that girl before she made her decision, and hope for the best.
Before Paige and Erin met with Rob, Jordan showed up and told them that before they made their decision they would have to tell Rob their secret. Erin was very sweet and motherly to Paige when she started crying after Jordan left. Jordan soon returned to separate Paige and Erin prior to their encounters with Rob. Paige was first. Rob greeted her on the outer terrace with a big hug. Rob recapped his first encounter with Paige and then his second, and then his third, blah blah blah. Ultimately, he told Paige that he was "swept away" by her and felt "unworthy" of her in a way. They both got teary as Rob went on and on about Paige''s emotional honesty. After telling her how amazing she is for the umpteenth time, Rob revealed that he wasn''t choosing her. He said that the person in front of her wasn''t the same person that was there three weeks ago. And looking inside of his "new" self, despite his strong feelings for Paige, he felt he had a better chance with Erin. Paige responded by wishing Rob the best of luck. Wait a minute! Don''t they both have to reveal their million dollar secrets?! Paige turned and walked away?hey, come back here! She sulked upstairs and tried to make sense of it all. She was obviously sad and disappointed - and was convinced that Erin would choose the money over Rob.
With Erin, Rob opened by telling her that this was one of the most important moments of his life. Once again, he detailed the past few weeks, the dates, the attraction etcetera. Once again, he poured his heart out, explaining that he loved the feeling of being with Erin. He even compared her to his mother (in a good way)! He said he was following his heart, without fear, and that''s why he was choosing Erin. She was stunned into silence, then said "Well, you have put me in an interesting predicament" and fought back tears. She proceeded to confess her million dollar secret as Rob watched knowingly. She told Rob she was never motivated by money in her life. Then the other shoe dropped, when she told Rob that only two days ago did she find out she''d have to choose between the money and Rob. Erin said she always felt like Rob wasn''t really falling in love with her, he was just sort of infatuated. Also, her parents are in a situation that a million dollars could certainly help out with. She was very honest about her mixed feelings for Rob and her practical thinking about the money. Despite any future regrets or gold digger status, Erin told Rob she was taking the million dollars. Rob was stone-faced through her entire emotional speech. No reaction. Zip. Zero. So Erin just sort of kept talking to fill the awkward silences. Finally he told her that he knew about the million-dollar choice. Rob told Erin that he knew Paige would''ve chosen him, but he wanted to remain true to his emotions. You could almost hear Erin''s heart breaking for him. Then, Rob revealed that had Erin chosen him, they could''ve split the million. He even produced a check to prove it. I''m pretty sure Erin wanted the ground to open her up and swallow her at that point. They both wished each other well, then Rob handed Erin her million-dollar check and they hugged goodbye. But wait! There''s more!
The twists just keep on coming?cut to three weeks later. Erin arrived back at the house via limo and Jordan escorted her to the study. He offered her the chance to wager her million dollars for a second chance at love. She would have 15 eligible men to choose from. They would each have the deal that she and the other ladies had: love or money. If she could get the guy to choose her over the money, she would get another million bucks. If the guy chose the money, Erin would lose her current million and the second million! Erin said she hoped that what goes around didn''t come around this time, then she tossed her million-dollar check in the fireplace. Let the games begin, again! .[/size=3]

Có một bài rất hay nữa nói về money nee
THE LOVE OF MONEY
T.E. Cliffe Leslie
This essay was published in November, 1862, in a periodical which has ceased to exist.
The Love of Money has always been in more or less disrepute with moralists. They have almost universally assigned to it nearly the lowest place in the scale of human affections. We say of human affections, for it is one which distinguishes man from all other animals, however intelligent. `You call me dog,'' said Shylock to the Christian merchant; `hath a dog money?'' Phrenologists have indeed laid down that all the propensitiescombativeness, destructiveness, philoprogenitiveness, alimentiveness, love of life, &c.are `common to man with the lower animals;'' but we are surprised that they have not discovered a peculiar protuberance on the outside of the human head corresponding with a peculiar propensity for money inside it. It is the more to be regretted that they have not ascertained the locality of this organ, since a claim has been set up on behalf of the lower animals to a close relationship to the human family. If a bump of philargyriveness or philonomismativeness could be shown on the human head, a conspicuous absence of this manifestation on the cranium of the former would enable us to disprove the connection, to the satisfaction at least of believers in phrenology. It would not, however, enable us, without further inquiry, to determine whether the love of money, which distinguishes us from the brutes, places us above or below them in moral character. To satisfy ourselves on this point, we must begin by inquiring what this thing `Money,'' of which men, and men only, are so fond, consists of. Sir Robert reel''s celebrated question'' What is the meaning of that word, a round, with which we are all familiar? `was answered by himself in terms to the effect that a pound of money is a fixed quantity of gold or silver. But this answer, though highly appropriate to a discussion on the currency, is irrelevant to our present inquiry, whether money is a good or an evil; and whether the love of it is a good or a bad quality in mankind. Sir Robert reel very justly ridiculed the definition given by one writer on the currency of a pound, as `a sense of value in reference to currency as compared with commo***ies.'' Yet in practical life this is really something like what men generally mean and want by money. They mean so much goods; so much of the commo***ies for sale in the market of the world. A pound to a `navvy,'' for instance, is so much beer and tobacco; to his mother it is so much tea and sugar. But these two cases are sufficient to show the extreme difficulty of pronouncing any moral judgment whatever upon the love of money, considered as a general human propensity; for the love of tea and sugar is universally admitted to be in itself an innocent affection, while the love of beer and tobacco is often condemned as combining two most pernicious desires. The love of money is really only a phase for the love of a vast number of different things, which may be good, bad, or indifferent, regarded from a moral, religious, aesthetical, political, or medical point of view, but which are alike in one respectnamely, that they are all to be had for money, and are not to be had without it. As Solomon said, `A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry; but money answereth all things.'' The love of money is that universal desire for wealth from which political economists have deduced a theory of commercial values, along with several important truths respecting the con***ions of industrial energy and prosperity. Everybody wishes for some kind of wealth, and money is convertible into every other kind; and therefore everybody loves money for some purpose or other, from which we get the laws of competition, prices, wages, profits, and rent. Yet this general principle of pecuniary interest or love of riches by no means explains all the phenomena of the economic world. For it is, as we have said already, only a single expression for a great variety of wants, wishes, and tastes, which are not always the same from age to age, or from country to country, nor felt alike by every individual in any one age or country, and which, moreover, lead to very different consequences as regards the nature, amount, and distribution of wealth, and as regards the material as well as the moral welfare of human society.
That disease of language which metaphysicians call the realism of the schools still infests many of the terms and phrases which philosophy must employ. A host of different things are alike in some one respect, and a common name is given to them in reference to the single quality or ciromustance which they have in common. It is simply a name for their common feature, but it puts their numerous differences out of sight and out of mind, and they come to be thought of in a lump as one sort of thing. Those moralists, accordingly, who feel themselves the better for heartily denouncing the general principle of the love of money or pursuit of wealth with which political economy sets out, confound, in their horror of a mere abstraction, the love of health, cleanliness, decency, and knowledge, with sensuality, avarice, and vanity. And perhaps political economists have not escaped a bias from their own phraseology, and are apt to imagine in their scientific discussions a much fuller explanation of the complete phenomena of wealth, and a much closer approximation to the complete philosophy of the subject, than lies within their province as commonly circumscribed by themselves at present.
It is obvious that the love of money includes a demand for various things, the production of which variously affects both the material interests of the consumers and the quality and distribution of the revenue of the whole community. It includes a love of pictures, toys, jewellery, plate, furniture, clothing, opium, soap, bibles, brandy, and, in short, everything in the International Exhibition, and many things not exhibited there. It includes a love of eating and drinking, both in moderation and in excess; of literature and science; of architecture; of the fine arts; of indolence and ease, and of business and sport of foreign travel, and of a country house; of music; of charity, sensuality, cruelty, and power; of horses and dogs. It expresses sometimes a desire for the comforts of an old bachelor, and sometimes an inclination for matrimony; and when it takes the latter direction, it means with one young lady love in a cottage, and with another a palace without love; in one man it is fortunehunting in another, a disinterested attachment to Miss Aurora renniless. The disciples of Malthus know how to discriminate between the economic consequences of these diverse matrimonial tendencies, and the important differences of tihcir influence on the price of beef. Napoleon III. seems to behold in money the sinews of war; his friend Mr. Cobden connects it with commerce and peace. The poor man''s love of money is a different feeling from the rich man''s, and, accordingly, the writer of this essay never throbs with the emotions which must animate the breasts of Baron Rothschild and Lord Overstone. The American Southerner worships in the almighty dollar the giver of African slaves; the negro slave of Brazil adores it chiefly as the purchaser of liberty. The wealth which is coveted by men in the East is not that which is most prized by the men of the West. An Indian Rajah''s chief wealth is a plurality of wives, personal attendants and elephants, and a load of gold trappings on both his elephant''s body and his ownall which, not exclusive of the wives, would be more than an English duke or prince could bear. An old writer gives an account of a religious ceremony which he witnessed in Turkey, at which rrince Mustaphaa boy of eleven years old'' was so overloaded with jewels, both himself and his horse, that one might say he carried the value of an empire about him.'' That is to say, the wealth which, in the hands of English capitalists, would have made a whole territory prosperous, and been distributed in wages through many hundred families, was concentrated upon making one small Turkish child vain and uncomfortable. And the oriental lust for jewels not only has effects upon the economic con***ion of the world which merit the attention of the political economist, but it has also, in a great measure, sprung from the absence, for many ages, of the con***ions essential to general prosperity, and. the accumulation of wealth in really useful forms. Wherever insecurity has long prevailed, a spirit of hoarding must exist, with a desire for that sort of wealth which contains much value in a durable and portable form, and which is easily hidden, easily removed, and none the worse for being buried for months or years in the ground. It is probable, therefore, that the love of gold chains and jewels for which the European Jew is remark able has a European as well as an Asiatic origin, being inherited from his persecuted, plundered, and usurious ancestors in the middle ages, who found it necessary to pack their wealth into the smallest possible compass.
The existence of security, banks, and paper currency, have long exterminated from England that curious animal the genuine miser, with his treasure in a strong box, doing no good to anyone. Dr. Johnson, talking of misers to Boswell, said, `A man who keeps his money has, in reality, more use of it than he can have by spending it. Why, sir, Lowther, by keeping his money, had the command of the county, which his family has lost by spending it.'' But an English millionaire does not keep his money to himself, as the ancient miser, whether he spends it or not. If he saves it, instead of locking it up or carrying it about on his body, he puts it in a bank, and the banker''s customers make use of the wealth he does not himself consume.
But when we say that the form of the love of money which displays itself in a love of dress, ornaments, and jewels, is almost confined to the men of Eastern countries, we must be understood as speaking of men in the narrowest sense, and as making no allusion in that comparison to the ladies of the two hemispheres. Women have everywhere their own peculiar notions of the value of money; and a world of either men alone or of women alone would contain a very different assortment of articles of wealth from that in the great mundane shop for both ***es which exists. With most species of animals, the male is more gorgeously dressed than the female; but so it seems to be with the human species generally, only in its less civilized forms. For we may perceive, with the growth of European civilization, a marked decline in the taste of men for the display of wealth on the body. A mediaeval baron was much more expensively got up than his wife or daughter. Even in the last century the toilette of a gentleman was nearly as elaborate and splendid as that of a lady. Now, a gentleman thinks he makes a smart appearance with a flower in his button-hole, at an assembly at which the ladies are blazing with diamonds. It might be an instructive inquiry how far this difference in the desire for wealth is traceable to a radical difference in the natural mental constitutions of the ***es, and how far to restraints which confine the ambition of women in general to paltry objects, leading them to waste their time in hunting husbands, while men hunt seats in parliament, and foxes. Addison remarks, in the `Spectator,'' that `One may observe that women in all ages have taken more pains than men to adorn the outside of their heads.'' rerhaps one reason for this is, that men have in all ages prevented them from taking so much pains to adorn the inside. While we are on the subject of dress as one of the equivalents of money, and one of the objects of its pursuit, we may make a remark upon that singular revolution of the human mind through which it has come to be thought, by all men of a certain rank, in the Western world, becoming to attire themselves every evening in black from head to foot, as if for a funeral; and by most men, of all ranks, in that civilized region, becoming to clothe themselves in the dingiest hues all day long. The male apparel which is the last product of civilization appears to display a remarkable mixture of good sense and bad taste. The mistake made by the ladies of our time seems to be that of aiming at show and accomplishing waste; while the mistake of the gentlemen is that of aiming at plainness and accomplishing gloom.
Many other illustrations might be given of the curious turns taken by the fancy for clothing, as one of the uses of money. In the north of Ireland, for example, it is common to see a girl on the road with a smart bonnet, an extensive petticoat, and a gay parasol carried in the usual manner, but with a pair of shoes not upon her feet, but in her hands. Five-and-twenty years ago such a girl would have no more minded the effect of the sun on the skin of her face, than she now minds the effect of the earth on the skin of her foot; and five-and-twenty years hence it may be safely predicted that such a girl will not only think it advisable to wear her shoes on her feet, but will discover that they really hurt less there, when one is used to them, than the stones upon the road. At the same time, we must admit that the shoemakers of mankindand of womankind, too, we presumehave left nothing undone to perpetuate a prejudice against their own particular production, and to weaken the force of the love of money for the sake of obtaining it. There is, again, in the inventory of modern wealth, and among the civilized uses of money, another article of dress of so obvious and simple a character that many persons may naturally suppose that it descends from the most remote antiquity. Yet, some centuries ago, all the wardrobes in England did not comprise a single night-dress for lady or gentleman, king or queen. Take again, another institution of the modern dressing-roomthe bath. There is a history of civilization in the Tale of a Tub. There is a letter to the old `Spectator,'' on the effects of the love of money, in which the writer says that it is to that we owe the politician, the merchant, and the lawyer; `Nay,'' he adds, `I believe to that also we are indebted for our `Spectator.'''' We are not prepared to explain the various motives which inspire the pens of authors. Did Shakspeare write for money? Did rope? Did Dr. Johnson? Did Lord Macaulay? Does Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton? We are concerned at present with the motives of consumers rather than producers; and one thing at least is clear, that it is highly to the cre*** of the former to elicit such productions from the latter, and that the love of money in the modern world is to a great extent the love of good, elevating, and instructive objectsa love which meets with its return. New desires for health, decency, knowledge, refinement, and intellectual pleasures, have, in fact, revolutionised production. The antithesis to modern wealth is not so much poverty as a different kind of wealth. The change is more remarkable in the quality than in the quantity. No inconsiderable part of human wealth, it is true, still consists of the means of unhappiness rather than of happiness, and of the gratification of vice rather than of virtue. On the whole, however, there is a transformation in the moral character of wealth, and of the desires involved in the general love of money. For the most part, instead of representing wickedness, brutal delight, and idle pomp, or conquest, tyranny, and plunder, the wealth of Europe represents peace, culture, liberty, and the comfort of the many rather than the magnificence of the few. Where man''s treasure is, there his heart is also; and the treasures of modern civilization seem to us to show as remarkable an improvement in the moral as in the intellectual and physical con***ion of society. `Riches,'' said Milton, `grow in hell;'' for even in his time much of the wealth that grew on earth bore many marks of being the property of bad and unhappy beings. But we may venture now to ask those well-meaning persons who, without regard to time and place, and without discrimination between good and evil, repeat ancient warnings against the love of money and the pursuit of wealth, whether they mean to praise dirt under the name of poverty, and whether they think idleness better than industry, ignorance better than science and art, and barbarism better than civilized progress? To political economists, on the other hand, we venture *****ggest the cultivation of a department of the philosophy of riches which has never been scientifically investigated. The laws which regulate the value of the supply forthcoming from producers have been almost exhaustively developed in political economy; but the deeper laws which regulate the demand of the consumers, and which give the love of money all its force and all its meaning, have never yet received the regular attention of any school of philosophers.
Chúc vui

Poor the little boy, he was criticized by almost every member. Hehe I really doubt if he finds enough courage to come to English club again. However, it can''t be denied that he was seriously wrong to ask such a thing. You should always do your work by yourself and let other check it for you, if you really want to achieve a high score. I''m sure your oral mark would be much higher once the essay is written by yourself, you know what the main ideas are, how you support them and many other things that enable you to reach a perfect presentation before class. Good luck to you, folk. I have some kind of sample essays here, but they?Tre not on the topics given. You can only find some ideas there, remember it''s almost impossible to put them into your essay without modifying.
PS to caubetramtinh: ha, I can see you like to help people, too huh! Thank you for joining EC. But therê?Ts one thing I?Td like to ask you, the first article posted by you in this topic seems to be a story rather than an essay, right? It?Ts fun to read anyway
Topic: Are parents the best teacher?
Everyone in the world always desires to have a happy family and good parents. Though parents may be too lenient or too strict, they all have the only hope that their children would become good citizens. However, there is a problem still open to question whether parents are the best teacher?
Obviously, the first teachers we have in most cases are our parents. They teach us how to walk, how to speak and how to have good manners gradually before we reach "the real world". More than even the professional teachers that we have at school, parents generally are the most involved in the development and education of children. They are the people who have brought up and protected us since we were very small. They have a kind of instinct to sacrifice a part of themselves for the betterment of their children. They love us and have great patience while passing down their knowledge to us. They teach us many things that our teachers might not, they tell us stories, talk about whatever they know or just a small gesture that we should follow. As experienced people, parents always help us with all the difficulties in life. Whenever we''re happy or disappointed, we can easily find our parents a reliable place to look to.
Parents, from time to time, may be too strict with us. They may punish and beat us when we do sth wrong. In fact, they don''t really hate us, they certainly know why and what they do that for and also know when to stop and soothe their children. As a saying goes "Spare the rod and spoil the child", if they are too lenient, then their children will probably become bad. During the stage of child development, adolescence, parents can still be in the best position to offer advice even though the children might not accept it. They may expect their children''s interests to be similar to their own. Also, they can''t seem to separate their children in their mind. If they love science, they may try to force their child to love science, too. But what if their child''s true love is art, writing or singing? So we can see that being a teacher of growing child become more and more complicated as time passes by and many parents are simply not able to meet the increasing demands.
On the other hand, I would say that parents are not professional teachers and they ten to be very biased by their love for their children. For example, limiting a child''s freedom in the name of safety - what a teacher sees as a valuable new experience, like traveling in a big city, might seem too dangerous through the eyes of parents. So wishing good things and an easy life may also prevent children from maturation. In any case, parents usually can present only one viewpoint of the world, while good teaching should be based on different attitudes. Maybe different generations have different ways of thinking. When children are young, they believe that their parents are always right, but when they get older, they begin to learn that there are still many other views. In ad***ion, once our parents get older, they appear to be more conservative and can''t always be objective in regard to modern trends and fashions.
I''m sorry I couldn''t find where the conclusion of this essay is. We made a presentation on this topic and the conclusion was written on another page. There''re a few things can be used in topic number 7 and 14.
So close no matter how far... I have you in my heart and nothing else matters...

To: reliable_boy194 asked me how to search all topics you want, I think you can visit sites for instance :
http://www.englishclub.net (com)
http://cctc2.commnet.edu
http://www.google.com.vn
after load your site on your screens you type the words you want to search, I mean importance is key word, If you have key words in your mind you will have all information you want
If you can exploit 2 this site I think you can get many things not only topics. hope you enjoy

Bạn mua lấy quyển Essay TOEFL của Barron mà tham khảo các ý. Sau đó tự triển khai, sắp xếp theo cách mình thấy dễ nhất để present. Rồi nghĩ tới thêm vài câu hỏi phụ cô giáo có thể hỏi, tự trả lời.
Tuy nhiên, mình nghĩ cách học tốt nhất và lâu dài nhất là bạn nên chịu khó đọc. Vừa giúp nâng cao từ vựng, kiến thức, lại rèn cho mình cách trình bày ngắn gọn, súc tích (nhất là các bài phân tích sự kiện ở trên các báo điện từ lớn của Mỹ). Bạn làm được, đúng không nào ?
Chúc may mắn.

Shingo
~~A better day~~Cứ gọi tôi là Alex chán đời~~Thành viên rất tích cực
,IsraelThành viên từ 12:20, 03/08/02Đã được 46 người bình chọn (4.80)    Quản lý thành viên
http://www.ttvnol.com/forum/tinhocvn/images/icon_e***_topic.gif              Than phiền


Tuần tới tớ sẽ thi vấn đáp mấy môn World Of Business và Business Opportunities. Có mấy topic để ôn thi. Ai có thể giúp tớ trả lời mấy topic này với ? Ko cần là đã phải học về Business đâu. mà bạn nghĩ như nào thì cứ trả lời như thế cũng Ok. Cảm ơn.Topics for Oral test1.talk about the advantages and disadvantages of the flexitime system2.The use of computers in offices results in an increase in unemployment.Why o? what can be done to solve this problem?3.Getting famous people to endorse products is an effective way to advertise goods and services. What are your views?4.discuss the main reasons that make companies go public.5.Talk about the system of lifetime employment in Japan. How does it work?6.Talk about popular methods of advertising goods and services. What are their advantages and disadvantages7.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of payment by seniority, promotion by seniority, and consensus decision making.8.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of setting up a factory in the foreign country.9.Talk about franchising,its advantages for the franchisor and the franchisee.10.Talk about joint ventures, their advantages and disadvantages for both sides.11.Discuss some of the cultural difference you have experienced in your working life(social distances and touching, gestures, how loudly people speak, eye contact, etc..).12.Make a list of some of the recent activities of your department, division or company or of the company that you know.13."Most students are taking higher education courses". Talk about this trend in your country. Is is happening? If so, why do you think it is happening ? What do you think caused it?14.Suggest at least three factors in order of importance for the customers to choose their supplier15. What is TQM? Your opinion on how it benefits ,or could benefit your organization?



Gửi lúc 21:48, 22/01/05
 ... Everything means Nothing...

silentsoul
,FranceThành viên từ 16:34, 09/02/03Đã được 2 người bình chọn (5.00)    Quản lý thành viên

http://www.ttvnol.com/forum/tinhocvn/images/icon_e***_topic.gif             Than phiền




Bạn đang học ở nước nào vậy?. Hay là bạn đang ở VN?.
Đọc qua mấy cái topic trên tôi thấy cũng khá hay. Bạn nên chọn một trong những topic đó rồi tìm tài liệu trên mạng.
Sau khi chọn xong topic xong bạn khoanh vùng các problem cần nói đến.
Ví dụ nhé: topic là Discrimination in the employment , why should companies struggle against the phenomenon?.
Với chủ đề trên bạn khoanh vùng được 2 điểm chính trên.
Tiếp theo đó bạn tìm thông tin về hai 2 điểm đó, chọn ra những thông tin nào thich hợp với points đó nhất.
Ví dụ : Discrimination : -/ Discrimination towards women-/ Discrimination towards disabilities -/ Discrimination towards immigrants ........and so on. Và bạn làm tiếp phần hai của topic cũng theo cách tương tự.
Cuối cùng bạn làm conclusion. Nếu làm được conclusion mở thì càng hay. (quên chưa nói là bạn cũng phải làm intro nữa).
P/s: bạn nên tự tìm lấy thông tin và câu trả lời cho chính mình. Chính cái origin đấy giám khảo mới đánh giá cao.



Gửi lúc 22:28, 22/01/05