Why don't we write essays and have correction right here?

We''''ve just seen exchanges of class info in this forum.
Why don''t we kick off to practice writing skills and cross- checking for each other right here?

Let''''s think out topics and write !!!

Hi there!
Surely that''s a great idea encouraging a long week of hopelessly waiting and patiently initializing our draft essay-writing-for-ielts plan.
So far, we did have a so-called first-or-might-be-last topic out of the public. Here that is.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should read only those books that are about real events, real people, and established facts. Use specific reasons and details *****pport your opinion.

If any of you out there would have a feeling that writing is a sort of your own concerns or interests, just stick up to us by providing your writing candidates. Handouts, ideas, advices and the like are warmly appreciated. For kind of common human being reasons, all of those errors, mistakes, failures are also welcome then.
Speaking for myself, actually I did write one essay about the topic above. But it did hurt one of my being-around friend''s eyes as when she took a first look at it. It turned out that, this essay of mine was too long to be easily known, and truly, it''s off the topic, abstracting myself either. So to speak, if there''re you guys being interested in doing these stuff with me together, I would raise up my confidence not to give up plan of getting purpose-of-my-life 6.0 score at ielts examination. In another word, I''m in again.
To Chapi2007: Hello pal!

Yah, yah, it''s great. you''ve thrown out a lovely writing.
Certainly, we''re in to ... win . Hey. sounds like a plagiarism from the hopeful in-deadlock candiate Clinton. But, yes, everything needs a good start.
From tommorow, I''ll join with you in the above topic first.
lots of thanks,
And note for sure: everyone''s subject to be checked and checks are subject to be welcomed.
See u
Được Chapi2007 sửa chữa / chuyển vào 23:58 ngày 02/03/2008
Được Chapi2007 sửa chữa / chuyển vào 00:04 ngày 03/03/2008

Senator Hilary Clinton - First Lady of former President of US Bill Clinton has delivered an attractive US presidential 2008 race, drawing much attention and speculation over chances if have any.
No woman has ever been nominated by a major party (Republican Party and Democratic Party) to run for President in the history of U.S. presidential elections.
Some gals here and there have put their hopes and wish on her for what I think maybe as being influenced by the Vietnamese Women Day to come - March, 8th
Congratulation today - March, 3rd. We men still have several days left to enjoy.

I thought Hillary is losing to Obama , though I haven''t understood fully the whole candidate-election system yet .
anyway I don''t know which one I should support , Bill Clinton''s policy toward Vietnam is friendly , so I guess Hillary shares the same idea with her husband . But the Repulican''s candidate ( forgot his name ) was held prisoner in Vietnam in 5 years, so what''s his attitude toward Vietnam anyway .
P/S Chapi : I think if you want to write in English , feel free to do it . And if you want to ask people to correct your wirting , once or twice is okay but asking frequently is like , u soon find out. ... asking for money or taking advantage of people''s generosity .

Hi,
- I am also in Obamania, while being tired of Clinton. If you are interested in the election, there are lots of news in cnn or yahoo webpages. The man you mentioned is McCain.
Any way, I share with you that we should have two streams of feelings about this, one if of our owned interest, the other of our country''s. Yah, may be the latter is less important, ''cause it is out of our responsibilities.
- About the writing practice. Oh, man! Don''t think that I intend to take advantage of someone''s kind.
I never act in that way. Just got to think the forums are somehow full of ads for classes and clubs (not nite clubs) , and lack of something like - do-it-yourself. Even, people in here are speaking in Vietnamese more than in English as it should be.
What you and I need is practising in real chances. It''s nothing but a win/win contest. So why don''t we come out do-it-ourselves and help each other.
Writing is difficult, and making us lazy. And clearly, getting others attention and KIND to correct is even more challenging.
Oh, come on. Let''s do it first. We''re all busy and surely we have no chance to bother others much more than twice / week as you said.
Yes, thanks much. I''m writing the topic over there right now.

By the way, I don''t know if I am correct to write:
- the hopeful in-deadlock candidate ???
They usually write hopeful candidate or hopeful Clinton... for the meaning of a candidate running for presidency.
In-deadlock, because she is in deadlock competition.
So, should I write as above, or put the hopeful further inside, near the candidate, eg. in-deadlock hopeful candidate, neither of them???
Thanks

IMO, the best practice is self-correction and google is your best assistant . The point of posting it in 4rum is to have people to discuss it with you ( if they find it interesting ) ,and therefore, motivate you to keep writing
and in my humble opinion, your writing is a bit mixture of formal and informal language ( not sure , though ) , it''s kind of annoying ( or is it only me ? )
and as for your phase : "in-deadlock candidate" , I pasted it in google and received no results. I thought it''s very unlikely a proper phase .
back to the topic of interest , why do you support Obama ? In a recent debate between he and Hillary , he accused her of supporting Bush in the Iraq war and later, Afghanistan. If it''s true, Hillary will probably have an aggressive policy which don''t receive much approval in public.
P/S : IELTS topic is so boring

and in my humble opinion, your writing is a bit mixture of formal and informal language ( not sure , though )
-------
Yes. It''''s what I want to know. Thanks. Your opion of the term is also worth my efforts.
About Clinton, she first voted for the war, now she opposes it. I think she is inconsistent.
---------
Below is my first practice.
Được Chapi2007 sửa chữa / chuyển vào 00:11 ngày 04/03/2008

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should read only those books that are about real events, real people, and established facts. Use specific reasons and details *****pport your opinion.
----------
Those books with real events, people and established facts are of course having greater advantages on readers. However, saying that the others are not deserve to be paid attention is somehow pretty strict. Those ones with unrealities are in many case still valuably meaningful, not only for the sake of recreation but also even for life application.
First of all, as we all know that the value of books depends on each theme the authors set out to solve. Readers will automatically choose the one that is suitable with their particular demands and interests; for example time-killing recreation, career guide, illness treatment or just friend-making manual. The better demand-meeting solution a book provides, the more seller it can be. Therefore, it is all about the arts of the author?Ts story- development and writing.
Nevertheless, if real- life examples of events, people and facts are built *****pport the author?Ts main findings or arguments, the book contents will be more persuasive, for sure. A real Rockerfeller?Ts story in Dale Carnegiê?Ts success-teaching book tells its readers much more than anything else. People naturally tend to believe in what have already happened, noted and widely accepted. Yet, it is quite necessary all the time? Probably, not. The fact is that, authors are neither able nor compulsory to know everything. Certainly, they should tell us what they come to know as more accruate as possible. But, their task of fulfilling their stories and solving what they have set out to communicate to readers is utmost significant. At the end of the day, what the readers are satisfied with the book is what he is benifited from it and to what extent his expectations are met by the author development and writing. For this purpose, unreal events, fake persons, invented facts could be mobilized as far as they support the author?Ts main themes and are less odd-looking enough for not to raise the reader?T skepticism.
Moreover, ones must agree that there are often different explanations or arguments over the same events. Evenmore, there is quite not a few cases that the real ones are still subject to the world?Ts doubts; meanwhile, such thing like ghosts are unreal but why are horror books and films still welcomed? Believing them is the rights of people and in this topic, the readers. Eventually, it can wisely state that events, people and facts though real or not are only means for authors to reach the communication objectives. No matter what means they use, it is their abilities in developing the stories and the contents they intend to convey, the most concerned things for readers when choosing what to read and trust.
In conclusion, the real stuff in a book is a clear plus for the readers to take it from shelves. However, it should not be prerequisite con***ions for us to look for a good book. Because, we should first look inside to understand what benefits we are really looking for by the readings other than to what extents those stories there are true or not; secondly, keep in mind that the book quality is also and much more resting upon the writer?Ts talents.
-----
Note: @ alooo123: I made it in much more than 30 mins.
Later, should we set the time as well?